《漫长的十九世纪的女性哲学家:德国传统》,克里斯汀·格斯达尔、达利亚·纳萨尔主编

IF 0.7 1区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY
Alison Stone
{"title":"《漫长的十九世纪的女性哲学家:德国传统》,克里斯汀·格斯达尔、达利亚·纳萨尔主编","authors":"Alison Stone","doi":"10.1353/hph.2023.0031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Breazeale’s analyses provide us with all the means to take a stand about this notion that generated epic battles between interpreters, but also about many others—for instance the status of the second principle, which Hegel deemed “unfounded”; the practical foundation of the system, which some interpreters considered problematic; and the precise meaning of the concept of “check” or “impetus” (Anstoß). Thanks to Breazeale’s introduction, these debates find valuable elements of resolution. Thus, Breazeale accomplishes a real feat: his erudition serves a presentation of Fichte’s philosophy that will be beneficial to every reader, neophyte and specialist alike. I s a b e l l e T h o m a s F o g i e l University of Ottawa","PeriodicalId":46448,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY","volume":"61 1","pages":"336 - 337"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Women Philosophers in the Long Nineteenth Century: The German Tradition ed. by Kristin Gjesdal and Dalia Nassar (review)\",\"authors\":\"Alison Stone\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/hph.2023.0031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Breazeale’s analyses provide us with all the means to take a stand about this notion that generated epic battles between interpreters, but also about many others—for instance the status of the second principle, which Hegel deemed “unfounded”; the practical foundation of the system, which some interpreters considered problematic; and the precise meaning of the concept of “check” or “impetus” (Anstoß). Thanks to Breazeale’s introduction, these debates find valuable elements of resolution. Thus, Breazeale accomplishes a real feat: his erudition serves a presentation of Fichte’s philosophy that will be beneficial to every reader, neophyte and specialist alike. I s a b e l l e T h o m a s F o g i e l University of Ottawa\",\"PeriodicalId\":46448,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"336 - 337\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/hph.2023.0031\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/hph.2023.0031","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

布雷泽莱的分析为我们提供了所有的手段来表明对这一概念的立场,这一概念在口译员之间引发了史诗般的战斗,但也涉及许多其他概念——例如黑格尔认为“毫无根据”的第二原则的地位;该制度的实际基础,一些口译员认为这是有问题的;以及“检查”或“动力”概念的确切含义(Anstoß)。由于布雷泽莱的介绍,这些辩论找到了解决问题的宝贵因素。因此,布雷泽莱完成了一项真正的壮举:他的博学为费希特的哲学提供了一个展示,这对每一位读者,无论是新手还是专家,都是有益的。我是渥太华大学
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Women Philosophers in the Long Nineteenth Century: The German Tradition ed. by Kristin Gjesdal and Dalia Nassar (review)
Breazeale’s analyses provide us with all the means to take a stand about this notion that generated epic battles between interpreters, but also about many others—for instance the status of the second principle, which Hegel deemed “unfounded”; the practical foundation of the system, which some interpreters considered problematic; and the precise meaning of the concept of “check” or “impetus” (Anstoß). Thanks to Breazeale’s introduction, these debates find valuable elements of resolution. Thus, Breazeale accomplishes a real feat: his erudition serves a presentation of Fichte’s philosophy that will be beneficial to every reader, neophyte and specialist alike. I s a b e l l e T h o m a s F o g i e l University of Ottawa
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: Since January 2002, the Journal of the History of Philosophy has been published by The Johns Hopkins University Press. For subscriptions, change of address, and back issues, please contact Subscription Services. In addition to photocopying allowed by the "fair use" doctrine, JHP authorizes personal or educational multiple-copying by instructors for use within a course. This policy does not cover photocopying for commercial use either by individuals or publishers. All such uses must be authorized by JHP.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信