{"title":"《漫长的十九世纪的女性哲学家:德国传统》,克里斯汀·格斯达尔、达利亚·纳萨尔主编","authors":"Alison Stone","doi":"10.1353/hph.2023.0031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Breazeale’s analyses provide us with all the means to take a stand about this notion that generated epic battles between interpreters, but also about many others—for instance the status of the second principle, which Hegel deemed “unfounded”; the practical foundation of the system, which some interpreters considered problematic; and the precise meaning of the concept of “check” or “impetus” (Anstoß). Thanks to Breazeale’s introduction, these debates find valuable elements of resolution. Thus, Breazeale accomplishes a real feat: his erudition serves a presentation of Fichte’s philosophy that will be beneficial to every reader, neophyte and specialist alike. I s a b e l l e T h o m a s F o g i e l University of Ottawa","PeriodicalId":46448,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY","volume":"61 1","pages":"336 - 337"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Women Philosophers in the Long Nineteenth Century: The German Tradition ed. by Kristin Gjesdal and Dalia Nassar (review)\",\"authors\":\"Alison Stone\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/hph.2023.0031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Breazeale’s analyses provide us with all the means to take a stand about this notion that generated epic battles between interpreters, but also about many others—for instance the status of the second principle, which Hegel deemed “unfounded”; the practical foundation of the system, which some interpreters considered problematic; and the precise meaning of the concept of “check” or “impetus” (Anstoß). Thanks to Breazeale’s introduction, these debates find valuable elements of resolution. Thus, Breazeale accomplishes a real feat: his erudition serves a presentation of Fichte’s philosophy that will be beneficial to every reader, neophyte and specialist alike. I s a b e l l e T h o m a s F o g i e l University of Ottawa\",\"PeriodicalId\":46448,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"336 - 337\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/hph.2023.0031\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/hph.2023.0031","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Women Philosophers in the Long Nineteenth Century: The German Tradition ed. by Kristin Gjesdal and Dalia Nassar (review)
Breazeale’s analyses provide us with all the means to take a stand about this notion that generated epic battles between interpreters, but also about many others—for instance the status of the second principle, which Hegel deemed “unfounded”; the practical foundation of the system, which some interpreters considered problematic; and the precise meaning of the concept of “check” or “impetus” (Anstoß). Thanks to Breazeale’s introduction, these debates find valuable elements of resolution. Thus, Breazeale accomplishes a real feat: his erudition serves a presentation of Fichte’s philosophy that will be beneficial to every reader, neophyte and specialist alike. I s a b e l l e T h o m a s F o g i e l University of Ottawa
期刊介绍:
Since January 2002, the Journal of the History of Philosophy has been published by The Johns Hopkins University Press. For subscriptions, change of address, and back issues, please contact Subscription Services. In addition to photocopying allowed by the "fair use" doctrine, JHP authorizes personal or educational multiple-copying by instructors for use within a course. This policy does not cover photocopying for commercial use either by individuals or publishers. All such uses must be authorized by JHP.