饮用水水质评估的概率方法

IF 0.9 Q3 GEOLOGY
Geologos Pub Date : 2019-12-01 DOI:10.2478/logos-2019-0027
Katarzyna Wątor, E. Kmiecik, A. Postawa, Piotr Rusiniak
{"title":"饮用水水质评估的概率方法","authors":"Katarzyna Wątor, E. Kmiecik, A. Postawa, Piotr Rusiniak","doi":"10.2478/logos-2019-0027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Knowledge of uncertainty in analytical results is of prime importance in assessments of compliance with requirements set out for the quality of water intended for human consumption. Assessments of drinking water quality can be performed using either a deterministic or a probabilistic method. In the former approach, every single result is referred directly to the parametric value, while in the probabilistic method uncertainty related to analytical results is taken into account during the decision-making process. In the present research, laboratory uncertainty and uncertainty determined on the basis of results of analyses of duplicate samples collected in two Polish cities were compared and used in the probabilistic approach of water quality assessment. Using the probabilistic method, more results were considered to be “above the parametric value”. Most excesses were observed when the maximum allowable uncertainty as set out in the Regulation of the Minister of Health of 7 December 2017 was used, which is due to the highest values of these uncertainties. The lowest values above parametric values in the probabilistic approach were observed when measurement uncertainty was considered.","PeriodicalId":44833,"journal":{"name":"Geologos","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A probabilistic approach to assessment of the quality of drinking water\",\"authors\":\"Katarzyna Wątor, E. Kmiecik, A. Postawa, Piotr Rusiniak\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/logos-2019-0027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Knowledge of uncertainty in analytical results is of prime importance in assessments of compliance with requirements set out for the quality of water intended for human consumption. Assessments of drinking water quality can be performed using either a deterministic or a probabilistic method. In the former approach, every single result is referred directly to the parametric value, while in the probabilistic method uncertainty related to analytical results is taken into account during the decision-making process. In the present research, laboratory uncertainty and uncertainty determined on the basis of results of analyses of duplicate samples collected in two Polish cities were compared and used in the probabilistic approach of water quality assessment. Using the probabilistic method, more results were considered to be “above the parametric value”. Most excesses were observed when the maximum allowable uncertainty as set out in the Regulation of the Minister of Health of 7 December 2017 was used, which is due to the highest values of these uncertainties. The lowest values above parametric values in the probabilistic approach were observed when measurement uncertainty was considered.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44833,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geologos\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geologos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/logos-2019-0027\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geologos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/logos-2019-0027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

摘要分析结果中的不确定性知识在评估是否符合人类饮用水质量要求方面至关重要。饮用水质量评估可以使用确定性或概率性方法进行。在前一种方法中,每个结果都直接涉及参数值,而在概率方法中,在决策过程中考虑了与分析结果相关的不确定性。在本研究中,对实验室的不确定性和根据在波兰两个城市收集的重复样本分析结果确定的不确定性进行了比较,并将其用于水质评估的概率方法。使用概率方法,更多的结果被认为是“高于参数值”。当使用2017年12月7日卫生部长条例中规定的最大允许不确定性时,观察到了大多数过度,这是由于这些不确定性的最高值。当考虑测量不确定性时,观察到概率方法中高于参数值的最低值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A probabilistic approach to assessment of the quality of drinking water
Abstract Knowledge of uncertainty in analytical results is of prime importance in assessments of compliance with requirements set out for the quality of water intended for human consumption. Assessments of drinking water quality can be performed using either a deterministic or a probabilistic method. In the former approach, every single result is referred directly to the parametric value, while in the probabilistic method uncertainty related to analytical results is taken into account during the decision-making process. In the present research, laboratory uncertainty and uncertainty determined on the basis of results of analyses of duplicate samples collected in two Polish cities were compared and used in the probabilistic approach of water quality assessment. Using the probabilistic method, more results were considered to be “above the parametric value”. Most excesses were observed when the maximum allowable uncertainty as set out in the Regulation of the Minister of Health of 7 December 2017 was used, which is due to the highest values of these uncertainties. The lowest values above parametric values in the probabilistic approach were observed when measurement uncertainty was considered.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geologos
Geologos GEOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信