宪法法院如何决定

IF 0.1 Q4 LAW
Precedente Pub Date : 2017-05-22 DOI:10.18046/PREC.V9.2424
Pasquale Pasquino
{"title":"宪法法院如何决定","authors":"Pasquale Pasquino","doi":"10.18046/PREC.V9.2424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this article is to explore the mode of production of judicial sentences drafted by constitutional courts in Europe. The natural object of study of the constitutional theory is the analysis of this final product of judicial creation of Law by Constitutional Courts. However, the doctrine has not given sufficient attention –from a comparative law perspective– to the mechanisms and procedures that lead to the decisions of these institutions. Thus, this document will classify the different types of decision-making processes in the courts, analyzing the stages that make up the «mode of production», from the study of the decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States, the Constitutional Council of the French Republic, The Constitutional Court of Italy and the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany. At the end of the paper, some conclusions are made about the period of the magistrates, their party affiliation, the temporary restrictions of deliberation and institutional factors such as the number of attendees or the personalization of its members.","PeriodicalId":53905,"journal":{"name":"Precedente","volume":"9 1","pages":"9-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cómo deciden las Cortes Constitucionales\",\"authors\":\"Pasquale Pasquino\",\"doi\":\"10.18046/PREC.V9.2424\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this article is to explore the mode of production of judicial sentences drafted by constitutional courts in Europe. The natural object of study of the constitutional theory is the analysis of this final product of judicial creation of Law by Constitutional Courts. However, the doctrine has not given sufficient attention –from a comparative law perspective– to the mechanisms and procedures that lead to the decisions of these institutions. Thus, this document will classify the different types of decision-making processes in the courts, analyzing the stages that make up the «mode of production», from the study of the decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States, the Constitutional Council of the French Republic, The Constitutional Court of Italy and the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany. At the end of the paper, some conclusions are made about the period of the magistrates, their party affiliation, the temporary restrictions of deliberation and institutional factors such as the number of attendees or the personalization of its members.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53905,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Precedente\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"9-44\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Precedente\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18046/PREC.V9.2424\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Precedente","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18046/PREC.V9.2424","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文的目的是探讨欧洲宪法法院起草司法判决书的生产模式。宪法理论研究的自然目标是对宪法法院司法创造法律的最终产物进行分析。然而,从比较法的角度来看,该学说并没有充分注意导致这些机构作出决定的机制和程序。因此,本文件将对法院的不同类型的决策过程进行分类,分析构成“生产方式”的阶段,从美国最高法院,法兰西共和国宪法委员会,意大利宪法法院和德国联邦宪法法院的决定的研究。最后,从县长任期、县长所属政党、参议的临时性限制以及参议人数或委员的个性化等制度因素等方面得出结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cómo deciden las Cortes Constitucionales
The purpose of this article is to explore the mode of production of judicial sentences drafted by constitutional courts in Europe. The natural object of study of the constitutional theory is the analysis of this final product of judicial creation of Law by Constitutional Courts. However, the doctrine has not given sufficient attention –from a comparative law perspective– to the mechanisms and procedures that lead to the decisions of these institutions. Thus, this document will classify the different types of decision-making processes in the courts, analyzing the stages that make up the «mode of production», from the study of the decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States, the Constitutional Council of the French Republic, The Constitutional Court of Italy and the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany. At the end of the paper, some conclusions are made about the period of the magistrates, their party affiliation, the temporary restrictions of deliberation and institutional factors such as the number of attendees or the personalization of its members.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Precedente
Precedente LAW-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
21 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信