开展以社会营销为基础的大肠癌筛查活动,以粪便检测为中心,为使用联邦合格医疗保健中心服务的患者提供服务

IF 2.3 Q3 BUSINESS
Aldenise P. Ewing, Marlene Joannie Bewa, R. Zemen, Tali Schneider, Portia J. Zaire, Justice Clark, Jennifer L. Hefner, Claudia Parvanta
{"title":"开展以社会营销为基础的大肠癌筛查活动,以粪便检测为中心,为使用联邦合格医疗保健中心服务的患者提供服务","authors":"Aldenise P. Ewing, Marlene Joannie Bewa, R. Zemen, Tali Schneider, Portia J. Zaire, Justice Clark, Jennifer L. Hefner, Claudia Parvanta","doi":"10.1177/15245004231174874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background More than 50% of colorectal cancer (CRC)–related deaths could be prevented with early detection and treatment. Federally Qualified Healthcare Centers (FQHCs)—safety-net facilities that provide primary care services to uninsured, underinsured and minority patients—report some of the lowest CRC screening rates. Effective CRC screening interventions within FQHCs may help to promote CRC screening utilization among patients from diverse backgrounds. Focus of Article This study was designed to explore average-risk, patient perceptions of facilitators and impediments of using the Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) kit for CRC screening within the social marketing framework of the 4 “P’s”—product, price, place, and promotion. Research Aim To conduct formative research with priority populations (i.e., diverse, FQHC patients), assess acceptability of the FIT kit, and identify ways to better meet preferences and needs. Program Design/Approach Qualitative, Focus Groups. Importance to the Social Marketing Field Findings from this study would aid in the future development of a community-based prevention marketing intervention to promote CRC screening within FQHCs that serve diverse patient populations. Methods Focus groups were conducted in English and Spanish with CRC screening age-eligible patients from a South Florida FQHC System. Interview guides were designed to better understand FQHC patient perceptions of CRC Screening via the FIT kit (product) by up-to-date and not up-to-date participants. Additional topics included likes/dislikes (price), preferred location for completing CRC screening and receiving CRC prevention education (place), and strategies for persuasive communication to increase CRC screening among patients who visit FQHCs (promotion). Data were analyzed to identify FIT screening facilitators and impediments using thematic coding in MaxQDA. Results Five focus groups, involving 36 participants aged 50 and older, were conducted. Over half of participants self-identified as Hispanic (36%) or non-Hispanic Black (28%). Key facilitators were the convenience and simplicity of at-home testing (product), presumed affordability of it compared to colonoscopy (price), and ability to return by mail (place). Participants also shared numerous strategies for promotion, including direct referral from Primary Care Providers, mass media campaigns, mailed or electronic reminders from the clinic, and peer advocacy events in churches. Recommendations for Research or Practice Social marketing provides an adequate approach for developing a patient-centered campaign to promote CRC screening uptake at FQHCs. Future CRC screening promotional campaigns at FQHCs should build on the motivation that patients must prioritize their health by emphasizing the convenience of completing CRC screening at home with the capability of mailing it back. Clinics should also work to reduce patient responsibility by developing automated clinic system reminders to openly communicate with patients about CRC screening.","PeriodicalId":46085,"journal":{"name":"Social Marketing Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing a Social Marketing–Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Campaign Centered on Stool-Based Testing for Patients Utilizing Services at a Federally Qualified Healthcare Center\",\"authors\":\"Aldenise P. Ewing, Marlene Joannie Bewa, R. Zemen, Tali Schneider, Portia J. Zaire, Justice Clark, Jennifer L. Hefner, Claudia Parvanta\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15245004231174874\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background More than 50% of colorectal cancer (CRC)–related deaths could be prevented with early detection and treatment. Federally Qualified Healthcare Centers (FQHCs)—safety-net facilities that provide primary care services to uninsured, underinsured and minority patients—report some of the lowest CRC screening rates. Effective CRC screening interventions within FQHCs may help to promote CRC screening utilization among patients from diverse backgrounds. Focus of Article This study was designed to explore average-risk, patient perceptions of facilitators and impediments of using the Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) kit for CRC screening within the social marketing framework of the 4 “P’s”—product, price, place, and promotion. Research Aim To conduct formative research with priority populations (i.e., diverse, FQHC patients), assess acceptability of the FIT kit, and identify ways to better meet preferences and needs. Program Design/Approach Qualitative, Focus Groups. Importance to the Social Marketing Field Findings from this study would aid in the future development of a community-based prevention marketing intervention to promote CRC screening within FQHCs that serve diverse patient populations. Methods Focus groups were conducted in English and Spanish with CRC screening age-eligible patients from a South Florida FQHC System. Interview guides were designed to better understand FQHC patient perceptions of CRC Screening via the FIT kit (product) by up-to-date and not up-to-date participants. Additional topics included likes/dislikes (price), preferred location for completing CRC screening and receiving CRC prevention education (place), and strategies for persuasive communication to increase CRC screening among patients who visit FQHCs (promotion). Data were analyzed to identify FIT screening facilitators and impediments using thematic coding in MaxQDA. Results Five focus groups, involving 36 participants aged 50 and older, were conducted. Over half of participants self-identified as Hispanic (36%) or non-Hispanic Black (28%). Key facilitators were the convenience and simplicity of at-home testing (product), presumed affordability of it compared to colonoscopy (price), and ability to return by mail (place). Participants also shared numerous strategies for promotion, including direct referral from Primary Care Providers, mass media campaigns, mailed or electronic reminders from the clinic, and peer advocacy events in churches. Recommendations for Research or Practice Social marketing provides an adequate approach for developing a patient-centered campaign to promote CRC screening uptake at FQHCs. Future CRC screening promotional campaigns at FQHCs should build on the motivation that patients must prioritize their health by emphasizing the convenience of completing CRC screening at home with the capability of mailing it back. Clinics should also work to reduce patient responsibility by developing automated clinic system reminders to openly communicate with patients about CRC screening.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46085,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Marketing Quarterly\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Marketing Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15245004231174874\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Marketing Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15245004231174874","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

超过50%的结直肠癌(CRC)相关死亡可以通过早期发现和治疗来预防。联邦合格医疗中心(FQHCs)——为无保险、保险不足和少数族裔患者提供初级保健服务的安全网设施——报告的一些结直肠癌筛查率最低。fqhc内有效的CRC筛查干预可能有助于促进不同背景患者对CRC筛查的利用。本研究旨在探讨在4个“P”(产品、价格、地点和促销)的社会营销框架下,使用粪便免疫化学测试(FIT)试剂盒进行CRC筛查的平均风险、患者对促进因素和障碍的看法。研究目的对优先人群(即不同的FQHC患者)进行形成性研究,评估FIT试剂盒的可接受性,并确定更好地满足偏好和需求的方法。程序设计/方法定性,焦点小组。本研究的发现将有助于未来以社区为基础的预防营销干预的发展,以促进为不同患者群体服务的fqhc的结直肠癌筛查。方法对来自南佛罗里达FQHC系统的CRC筛查年龄符合要求的患者用英语和西班牙语进行焦点小组调查。访谈指南旨在更好地了解FQHC患者通过FIT试剂盒(产品)对最新和非最新参与者的CRC筛查的看法。其他主题包括喜欢/不喜欢(价格),完成结直肠癌筛查和接受结直肠癌预防教育的首选地点(地点),以及在访问fqhc的患者中增加结直肠癌筛查的说服性沟通策略(推广)。利用MaxQDA中的主题编码对数据进行分析,以确定FIT筛选的促进因素和障碍。结果共分为5个焦点组,共36人,年龄在50岁及以上。超过一半的参与者自认为是西班牙裔(36%)或非西班牙裔黑人(28%)。关键的促进因素是家庭检测(产品)的便利性和简单性,与结肠镜检查相比,它的可承受性(价格),以及通过邮寄(地点)退货的能力。与会者还分享了许多推广策略,包括初级保健提供者的直接转介、大众媒体宣传、诊所的邮寄或电子提醒,以及教堂的同伴倡导活动。社会营销为开展以患者为中心的运动以促进fqhc的CRC筛查提供了适当的方法。未来在fqhc的CRC筛查推广活动应该建立在患者必须优先考虑健康的动机上,强调在家中完成CRC筛查的便利性,并能够邮寄回来。诊所还应通过开发自动诊所系统提醒,与患者公开沟通结直肠癌筛查,以减少患者的责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Developing a Social Marketing–Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Campaign Centered on Stool-Based Testing for Patients Utilizing Services at a Federally Qualified Healthcare Center
Background More than 50% of colorectal cancer (CRC)–related deaths could be prevented with early detection and treatment. Federally Qualified Healthcare Centers (FQHCs)—safety-net facilities that provide primary care services to uninsured, underinsured and minority patients—report some of the lowest CRC screening rates. Effective CRC screening interventions within FQHCs may help to promote CRC screening utilization among patients from diverse backgrounds. Focus of Article This study was designed to explore average-risk, patient perceptions of facilitators and impediments of using the Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) kit for CRC screening within the social marketing framework of the 4 “P’s”—product, price, place, and promotion. Research Aim To conduct formative research with priority populations (i.e., diverse, FQHC patients), assess acceptability of the FIT kit, and identify ways to better meet preferences and needs. Program Design/Approach Qualitative, Focus Groups. Importance to the Social Marketing Field Findings from this study would aid in the future development of a community-based prevention marketing intervention to promote CRC screening within FQHCs that serve diverse patient populations. Methods Focus groups were conducted in English and Spanish with CRC screening age-eligible patients from a South Florida FQHC System. Interview guides were designed to better understand FQHC patient perceptions of CRC Screening via the FIT kit (product) by up-to-date and not up-to-date participants. Additional topics included likes/dislikes (price), preferred location for completing CRC screening and receiving CRC prevention education (place), and strategies for persuasive communication to increase CRC screening among patients who visit FQHCs (promotion). Data were analyzed to identify FIT screening facilitators and impediments using thematic coding in MaxQDA. Results Five focus groups, involving 36 participants aged 50 and older, were conducted. Over half of participants self-identified as Hispanic (36%) or non-Hispanic Black (28%). Key facilitators were the convenience and simplicity of at-home testing (product), presumed affordability of it compared to colonoscopy (price), and ability to return by mail (place). Participants also shared numerous strategies for promotion, including direct referral from Primary Care Providers, mass media campaigns, mailed or electronic reminders from the clinic, and peer advocacy events in churches. Recommendations for Research or Practice Social marketing provides an adequate approach for developing a patient-centered campaign to promote CRC screening uptake at FQHCs. Future CRC screening promotional campaigns at FQHCs should build on the motivation that patients must prioritize their health by emphasizing the convenience of completing CRC screening at home with the capability of mailing it back. Clinics should also work to reduce patient responsibility by developing automated clinic system reminders to openly communicate with patients about CRC screening.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信