加拿大野生传粉昆虫战略:专家建议的解决方案和政策杠杆

IF 2.9 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Facets Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1139/facets-2022-0204
Rachel A. Nalepa, S. Colla
{"title":"加拿大野生传粉昆虫战略:专家建议的解决方案和政策杠杆","authors":"Rachel A. Nalepa, S. Colla","doi":"10.1139/facets-2022-0204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Invertebrate pollinators are in trouble: particularly documented are declines among bees and butterflies. Interacting stressors include pesticides, pathogens, habitat loss, nonnative species, and climate change. Many governments have strategies to reduce negative pressures on pollinators, but Canada does not despite widespread public interest in pollinator health. This study serves as a needs assessment for science-based policy solutions for wild pollinator conservation in Canada. We designed a Policy Delphi survey technique to identify solutions that experts deem both desirable and feasible. Our secondary aim was to identify research priorities that would inform the implementation of these solutions. Sixty % of the 83 unique solutions were supported and feasible at a high consensus level (10% were “strongly” supported and “definitely” feasible). General themes included improving the Canadian government's approach in assessing pesticide risk to pollinators, curbing pathogen spillover/spillback between managed and wild pollinators, and reducing the reliance of Canadian agricultural systems on pesticides, among others. We discuss solutions in reference to pollinator conservation policies recommended by the broader scientific community and identify policy levers within the context of Canada's highly decentralized approach to biodiversity conservation/management and a political economy that uses high numbers of managed, mostly nonnative bees for pollination services.","PeriodicalId":48511,"journal":{"name":"Facets","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Toward a wild pollinator strategy for Canada: expert-recommended solutions and policy levers\",\"authors\":\"Rachel A. Nalepa, S. Colla\",\"doi\":\"10.1139/facets-2022-0204\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Invertebrate pollinators are in trouble: particularly documented are declines among bees and butterflies. Interacting stressors include pesticides, pathogens, habitat loss, nonnative species, and climate change. Many governments have strategies to reduce negative pressures on pollinators, but Canada does not despite widespread public interest in pollinator health. This study serves as a needs assessment for science-based policy solutions for wild pollinator conservation in Canada. We designed a Policy Delphi survey technique to identify solutions that experts deem both desirable and feasible. Our secondary aim was to identify research priorities that would inform the implementation of these solutions. Sixty % of the 83 unique solutions were supported and feasible at a high consensus level (10% were “strongly” supported and “definitely” feasible). General themes included improving the Canadian government's approach in assessing pesticide risk to pollinators, curbing pathogen spillover/spillback between managed and wild pollinators, and reducing the reliance of Canadian agricultural systems on pesticides, among others. We discuss solutions in reference to pollinator conservation policies recommended by the broader scientific community and identify policy levers within the context of Canada's highly decentralized approach to biodiversity conservation/management and a political economy that uses high numbers of managed, mostly nonnative bees for pollination services.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48511,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Facets\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Facets\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1139/facets-2022-0204\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Facets","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1139/facets-2022-0204","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

无脊椎动物的传粉昆虫遇到了麻烦:尤其是蜜蜂和蝴蝶的数量减少。相互作用的压力源包括杀虫剂、病原体、栖息地丧失、外来物种和气候变化。许多政府都制定了减少传粉昆虫负面压力的策略,但尽管公众对传粉昆虫健康普遍感兴趣,加拿大却没有。这项研究是对加拿大野生传粉昆虫保护基于科学的政策解决方案的需求评估。我们设计了一种政策德尔菲调查技术,以确定专家认为既可取又可行的解决方案。我们的次要目标是确定研究重点,为这些解决方案的实施提供信息。83个独特的解决方案中,60%得到了高度一致的支持和可行(10%得到了“强烈”支持和“绝对”可行)。一般主题包括改进加拿大政府评估杀虫剂对传粉昆虫风险的方法,遏制病原体在管理传粉昆虫和野生传粉昆虫之间的溢出/回流,以及减少加拿大农业系统对杀虫剂的依赖等。我们讨论了参考更广泛的科学界建议的传粉昆虫保护政策的解决方案,并在加拿大高度分散的生物多样性保护/管理方法和使用大量管理蜜蜂(主要是非本地蜜蜂)提供授粉服务的政治经济背景下确定了政策杠杆。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Toward a wild pollinator strategy for Canada: expert-recommended solutions and policy levers
Invertebrate pollinators are in trouble: particularly documented are declines among bees and butterflies. Interacting stressors include pesticides, pathogens, habitat loss, nonnative species, and climate change. Many governments have strategies to reduce negative pressures on pollinators, but Canada does not despite widespread public interest in pollinator health. This study serves as a needs assessment for science-based policy solutions for wild pollinator conservation in Canada. We designed a Policy Delphi survey technique to identify solutions that experts deem both desirable and feasible. Our secondary aim was to identify research priorities that would inform the implementation of these solutions. Sixty % of the 83 unique solutions were supported and feasible at a high consensus level (10% were “strongly” supported and “definitely” feasible). General themes included improving the Canadian government's approach in assessing pesticide risk to pollinators, curbing pathogen spillover/spillback between managed and wild pollinators, and reducing the reliance of Canadian agricultural systems on pesticides, among others. We discuss solutions in reference to pollinator conservation policies recommended by the broader scientific community and identify policy levers within the context of Canada's highly decentralized approach to biodiversity conservation/management and a political economy that uses high numbers of managed, mostly nonnative bees for pollination services.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Facets
Facets MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
6.50%
发文量
48
审稿时长
28 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信