{"title":"AJI第116卷第4期封面和封面","authors":"Anton Moiseienko, Martina Buscemi","doi":"10.1017/ajil.2022.72","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Russia ’ s invasion of Ukraine, initiated on February 24, 2022, is among the most — if not the most — signi fi cant shocks to the global order since World War II. This piece assesses the stakes of the invasion for the core principles that lie at the heart of contemporary international law and the world order that it has helped to create. We argue, relying in part on the other contributions to the October 2022 agora on Ukraine in the American Journal of International Law , that however this war ends, it will reshape, in ways large and small, the world we all inhabit. member states to demonstrate their territorial claims, including in the Falklands dispute and the Israel-Palestine con fl ict. This has now arisen in the Russo-Ukrainian war, as con fl icting declarations have been formulated by eight states under the Convention. This Essay analyzes the legal dilemmas brought by these declarations and proposes preliminary solutions. novel digital technologies, civil society have seized the opportunity pro-vided by the vast amount of publicly available evidence to counter-narrate Russia ’ s pretexts to justify its invasion within the deliberative bodies of the United Nations. This Essay explains the potential of this emerging practice to in fl uence international legal discourse by increasing the costs for actors who base their conduct on false factual claims.","PeriodicalId":47841,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of International Law","volume":"116 1","pages":"f1 - f10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"AJI volume 116 issue 4 Cover and Front matter\",\"authors\":\"Anton Moiseienko, Martina Buscemi\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/ajil.2022.72\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Russia ’ s invasion of Ukraine, initiated on February 24, 2022, is among the most — if not the most — signi fi cant shocks to the global order since World War II. This piece assesses the stakes of the invasion for the core principles that lie at the heart of contemporary international law and the world order that it has helped to create. We argue, relying in part on the other contributions to the October 2022 agora on Ukraine in the American Journal of International Law , that however this war ends, it will reshape, in ways large and small, the world we all inhabit. member states to demonstrate their territorial claims, including in the Falklands dispute and the Israel-Palestine con fl ict. This has now arisen in the Russo-Ukrainian war, as con fl icting declarations have been formulated by eight states under the Convention. This Essay analyzes the legal dilemmas brought by these declarations and proposes preliminary solutions. novel digital technologies, civil society have seized the opportunity pro-vided by the vast amount of publicly available evidence to counter-narrate Russia ’ s pretexts to justify its invasion within the deliberative bodies of the United Nations. This Essay explains the potential of this emerging practice to in fl uence international legal discourse by increasing the costs for actors who base their conduct on false factual claims.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47841,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of International Law\",\"volume\":\"116 1\",\"pages\":\"f1 - f10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of International Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2022.72\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of International Law","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2022.72","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
俄罗斯于2022年2月24日入侵乌克兰,是二战以来对全球秩序最严重的冲击之一,如果不是最严重的话。这篇文章评估了入侵对当代国际法和它帮助创建的世界秩序的核心原则的影响。我们认为,无论这场战争如何结束,它都将以或大或小的方式重塑我们所居住的世界,这在一定程度上取决于《美国国际法杂志》(American Journal of International Law)对2022年10月乌克兰问题的其他贡献。包括福克兰群岛争端和巴以冲突在内的领土要求。这一点现在已经在俄乌战争中出现,因为八个国家根据《公约》发表了相互矛盾的声明。本文分析了这些声明所带来的法律困境,并提出了初步的解决方案。利用新的数字技术,公民社会抓住了大量公开证据提供的机会,在联合国审议机构内反驳俄罗斯为其入侵辩护的借口。本文解释了这种新兴做法的潜力,通过增加基于虚假事实主张的行为者的成本来影响国际法律话语。
Russia ’ s invasion of Ukraine, initiated on February 24, 2022, is among the most — if not the most — signi fi cant shocks to the global order since World War II. This piece assesses the stakes of the invasion for the core principles that lie at the heart of contemporary international law and the world order that it has helped to create. We argue, relying in part on the other contributions to the October 2022 agora on Ukraine in the American Journal of International Law , that however this war ends, it will reshape, in ways large and small, the world we all inhabit. member states to demonstrate their territorial claims, including in the Falklands dispute and the Israel-Palestine con fl ict. This has now arisen in the Russo-Ukrainian war, as con fl icting declarations have been formulated by eight states under the Convention. This Essay analyzes the legal dilemmas brought by these declarations and proposes preliminary solutions. novel digital technologies, civil society have seized the opportunity pro-vided by the vast amount of publicly available evidence to counter-narrate Russia ’ s pretexts to justify its invasion within the deliberative bodies of the United Nations. This Essay explains the potential of this emerging practice to in fl uence international legal discourse by increasing the costs for actors who base their conduct on false factual claims.
期刊介绍:
AJIL is a leading peer-reviewed journal, published quarterly since 1907. It features articles, essays, editorial comments, current developments, and book reviews by pre-eminent scholars and practitioners from around the world addressing developments in public and private international law and foreign relations law. The Journal also contains analyses of decisions by national and international courts and tribunals as well as a section on contemporary U.S. practice in international law. AJIL and AJIL Unbound are indispensable for all professionals working in international law, economics, trade, and foreign affairs.