《不那么隐蔽的课程:美国公立学校系统如何使移民学生成为少数族裔》

IF 2.7 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Janese L. Free, Katrin Kriẑ
{"title":"《不那么隐蔽的课程:美国公立学校系统如何使移民学生成为少数族裔》","authors":"Janese L. Free, Katrin Kriẑ","doi":"10.1080/10665684.2022.2047409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article casts light on how one public school system in the United States minoritizes migrant students by perpetuating systemic class and racial biases. Migrant students are the children of migrant workers who migrate across the United States seasonally to work in agriculture or fisheries. Based on in-depth interviews with 20 educators, we identified three main areas of class and racial biases that we call the not-so-hidden curriculum: First, the school system presumes (and rewards) English competency from migrant families, an expectation we call expectation of English language competency. Second, the system expects entitled and intensive learning from students. This type of learning assumes that students can advocate for themselves in their interactions with teachers and peers. The schools in the school system expect students to spend most of their time and energy on academic activities. Third, the system expects entitled and intensive educational parenting. In this parenting approach, parents are supposed to act as co-educators and co-decision makers with teachers and focus their energy and time on their children’s education. The interviews illustrate several incompatibilities among these ideologies and migrant students’ realities, especially their economic, social, and linguistic challenges. We discuss the implications of our findings on migrant students’ social mobility, future research, and migrant education policy.","PeriodicalId":47334,"journal":{"name":"Equity & Excellence in Education","volume":"55 1","pages":"50 - 72"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Not-So-Hidden Curriculum: How a Public School System in the United States Minoritizes Migrant Students\",\"authors\":\"Janese L. Free, Katrin Kriẑ\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10665684.2022.2047409\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article casts light on how one public school system in the United States minoritizes migrant students by perpetuating systemic class and racial biases. Migrant students are the children of migrant workers who migrate across the United States seasonally to work in agriculture or fisheries. Based on in-depth interviews with 20 educators, we identified three main areas of class and racial biases that we call the not-so-hidden curriculum: First, the school system presumes (and rewards) English competency from migrant families, an expectation we call expectation of English language competency. Second, the system expects entitled and intensive learning from students. This type of learning assumes that students can advocate for themselves in their interactions with teachers and peers. The schools in the school system expect students to spend most of their time and energy on academic activities. Third, the system expects entitled and intensive educational parenting. In this parenting approach, parents are supposed to act as co-educators and co-decision makers with teachers and focus their energy and time on their children’s education. The interviews illustrate several incompatibilities among these ideologies and migrant students’ realities, especially their economic, social, and linguistic challenges. We discuss the implications of our findings on migrant students’ social mobility, future research, and migrant education policy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47334,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Equity & Excellence in Education\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"50 - 72\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Equity & Excellence in Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2022.2047409\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Equity & Excellence in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2022.2047409","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

本文揭示了美国公立学校系统是如何通过延续系统性的阶级和种族偏见来使移民学生成为少数群体的。移民学生是移民工人的孩子,他们季节性地在美国各地从事农业或渔业工作。基于对20位教育工作者的深度访谈,我们确定了三个主要的阶级和种族偏见领域,我们称之为“不那么隐藏的课程”:首先,学校系统假定(并奖励)移民家庭的英语能力,我们称之为对英语语言能力的期望。第二,该系统期望学生有资格和密集的学习。这种类型的学习假设学生可以在与老师和同龄人的互动中为自己辩护。学校系统中的学校希望学生把大部分时间和精力花在学术活动上。第三,该制度期望享有权利和密集的教育教养。在这种教育方式中,父母应该与老师一起担任共同教育者和共同决策者,并将精力和时间集中在孩子的教育上。这些访谈说明了这些意识形态与流动学生现实之间的一些不相容,特别是他们在经济、社会和语言方面面临的挑战。我们讨论了研究结果对流动学生社会流动性、未来研究和流动学生教育政策的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Not-So-Hidden Curriculum: How a Public School System in the United States Minoritizes Migrant Students
ABSTRACT This article casts light on how one public school system in the United States minoritizes migrant students by perpetuating systemic class and racial biases. Migrant students are the children of migrant workers who migrate across the United States seasonally to work in agriculture or fisheries. Based on in-depth interviews with 20 educators, we identified three main areas of class and racial biases that we call the not-so-hidden curriculum: First, the school system presumes (and rewards) English competency from migrant families, an expectation we call expectation of English language competency. Second, the system expects entitled and intensive learning from students. This type of learning assumes that students can advocate for themselves in their interactions with teachers and peers. The schools in the school system expect students to spend most of their time and energy on academic activities. Third, the system expects entitled and intensive educational parenting. In this parenting approach, parents are supposed to act as co-educators and co-decision makers with teachers and focus their energy and time on their children’s education. The interviews illustrate several incompatibilities among these ideologies and migrant students’ realities, especially their economic, social, and linguistic challenges. We discuss the implications of our findings on migrant students’ social mobility, future research, and migrant education policy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Equity & Excellence in Education
Equity & Excellence in Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
23.10%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Equity & Excellence in Education publishes articles based on scholarly research utilizing qualitative or quantitative methods, as well as essays that describe and assess practical efforts to achieve educational equity and are contextualized within an appropriate literature review. We consider manuscripts on a range of topics related to equity, equality and social justice in K-12 or postsecondary schooling, and that focus upon social justice issues in school systems, individual schools, classrooms, and/or the social justice factors that contribute to inequality in learning for students from diverse social group backgrounds. There have been and will continue to be many social justice efforts to transform educational systems as well as interpersonal interactions at all levels of schooling.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信