注射相关性眼内炎的预防因素、诊断和治疗:一篇文献综述

Rupali Singh, Samaneh Davoudi, Steven Ness
{"title":"注射相关性眼内炎的预防因素、诊断和治疗:一篇文献综述","authors":"Rupali Singh,&nbsp;Samaneh Davoudi,&nbsp;Steven Ness","doi":"10.1007/s00417-022-05607-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intravitreal medication injections represent the gold standard treatment for a variety of potentially blinding chorioretinal vascular diseases. Despite their excellent safety profile, they are associated with the feared complication of injection-related endophthalmitis (IRE). Though the overall incidence of IRE is low, due to the ever-increasing number of injections being performed, it is a complication that all retina specialists are likely to encounter. This article reviews various factors that could potentially influence the risk of IRE and discusses evidence-based strategies for management.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>PubMed was searched for keywords \"intravitreal injection\" and \"endophthalmitis\" from the period of 1995-2021. Relevant articles were reviewed and selected articles were analyzed with respect to the incidence, potential preventive factors, clinical presentation, microbial profile, management, and outcomes for IRE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There is strong consensus supporting the use of povidone iodine topical antiseptic, eyelid retraction away from the injection site, and avoiding treatment of eyes with active surface or eyelid disease, but there is less agreement on the use of face masks versus \"no-talking\" policies and optimal anesthetic technique. Current evidence comparing tap and inject or early vitrectomy for treatment of IRE is inadequate to determine an optimal treatment strategy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intravitreal injections are sight saving, but even using established prophylactic measures there remains a small but real risk of infectious injection-related complications. Further investigations comparing tap and inject versus vitrectomy may help to establish optimal treatment, although the rarity of IRE makes designing adequately powered prospective trials a difficult task.</p>","PeriodicalId":75465,"journal":{"name":"Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie. Albrecht von Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology","volume":"260 1","pages":"2399-2416"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8917335/pdf/","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preventive factors, diagnosis, and management of injection-related endophthalmitis: a literature review.\",\"authors\":\"Rupali Singh,&nbsp;Samaneh Davoudi,&nbsp;Steven Ness\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00417-022-05607-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intravitreal medication injections represent the gold standard treatment for a variety of potentially blinding chorioretinal vascular diseases. Despite their excellent safety profile, they are associated with the feared complication of injection-related endophthalmitis (IRE). Though the overall incidence of IRE is low, due to the ever-increasing number of injections being performed, it is a complication that all retina specialists are likely to encounter. This article reviews various factors that could potentially influence the risk of IRE and discusses evidence-based strategies for management.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>PubMed was searched for keywords \\\"intravitreal injection\\\" and \\\"endophthalmitis\\\" from the period of 1995-2021. Relevant articles were reviewed and selected articles were analyzed with respect to the incidence, potential preventive factors, clinical presentation, microbial profile, management, and outcomes for IRE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There is strong consensus supporting the use of povidone iodine topical antiseptic, eyelid retraction away from the injection site, and avoiding treatment of eyes with active surface or eyelid disease, but there is less agreement on the use of face masks versus \\\"no-talking\\\" policies and optimal anesthetic technique. Current evidence comparing tap and inject or early vitrectomy for treatment of IRE is inadequate to determine an optimal treatment strategy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intravitreal injections are sight saving, but even using established prophylactic measures there remains a small but real risk of infectious injection-related complications. Further investigations comparing tap and inject versus vitrectomy may help to establish optimal treatment, although the rarity of IRE makes designing adequately powered prospective trials a difficult task.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75465,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie. Albrecht von Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"260 1\",\"pages\":\"2399-2416\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8917335/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie. Albrecht von Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-022-05607-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/3/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie. Albrecht von Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-022-05607-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/3/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

背景:玻璃体内药物注射是治疗各种潜在致盲性脉络膜视网膜血管疾病的金标准。尽管它们具有良好的安全性,但它们与令人担忧的注射相关性眼内炎(IRE)并发症有关。尽管IRE的总体发病率较低,但由于注射次数不断增加,这是所有视网膜专家都可能遇到的并发症。本文回顾了可能影响IRE风险的各种因素,并讨论了循证管理策略。方法:检索PubMed 1995-2021年期间的关键词“玻璃体内注射”和“眼内炎”。对相关文章进行了回顾,并从IRE的发病率、潜在预防因素、临床表现、微生物特征、管理和结果等方面对所选文章进行了分析,以及避免治疗患有活动性表面或眼睑疾病的眼睛,但在使用口罩与“禁止说话”政策和最佳麻醉技术之间的一致性较低。目前比较穿刺注射或早期玻璃体切除术治疗IRE的证据不足以确定最佳治疗策略。结论:玻璃体内注射可以挽救视力,但即使采用既定的预防措施,感染性注射相关并发症的风险仍然很小,但确实存在。对穿刺注射与玻璃体切除术进行进一步的比较研究可能有助于确定最佳治疗方法,尽管IRE的罕见性使得设计足够有力的前瞻性试验成为一项困难的任务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Preventive factors, diagnosis, and management of injection-related endophthalmitis: a literature review.

Preventive factors, diagnosis, and management of injection-related endophthalmitis: a literature review.

Preventive factors, diagnosis, and management of injection-related endophthalmitis: a literature review.

Preventive factors, diagnosis, and management of injection-related endophthalmitis: a literature review.

Background: Intravitreal medication injections represent the gold standard treatment for a variety of potentially blinding chorioretinal vascular diseases. Despite their excellent safety profile, they are associated with the feared complication of injection-related endophthalmitis (IRE). Though the overall incidence of IRE is low, due to the ever-increasing number of injections being performed, it is a complication that all retina specialists are likely to encounter. This article reviews various factors that could potentially influence the risk of IRE and discusses evidence-based strategies for management.

Method: PubMed was searched for keywords "intravitreal injection" and "endophthalmitis" from the period of 1995-2021. Relevant articles were reviewed and selected articles were analyzed with respect to the incidence, potential preventive factors, clinical presentation, microbial profile, management, and outcomes for IRE.

Results: There is strong consensus supporting the use of povidone iodine topical antiseptic, eyelid retraction away from the injection site, and avoiding treatment of eyes with active surface or eyelid disease, but there is less agreement on the use of face masks versus "no-talking" policies and optimal anesthetic technique. Current evidence comparing tap and inject or early vitrectomy for treatment of IRE is inadequate to determine an optimal treatment strategy.

Conclusion: Intravitreal injections are sight saving, but even using established prophylactic measures there remains a small but real risk of infectious injection-related complications. Further investigations comparing tap and inject versus vitrectomy may help to establish optimal treatment, although the rarity of IRE makes designing adequately powered prospective trials a difficult task.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信