农村妇女、高等教育和20世纪早期国内科学倡议的混合遗产

Q2 Social Sciences
Kathleen E. Gillon
{"title":"农村妇女、高等教育和20世纪早期国内科学倡议的混合遗产","authors":"Kathleen E. Gillon","doi":"10.1080/26379112.2022.2100999","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Today, institutions of higher education enroll rural students, and specifically rural women, at rates lower than their urban counterparts (Flora et al., 2018). Additionally, the disciplines of teaching and home economics continue to dominate the curricular choices of rural women. As higher education scholars continue to explore these phenomena, a historical understanding of the relationship between rural women and education in the United States can provide an important context for scholarship about these educational patterns.This article explores the mixed legacies of three educational programs/policies implemented in the early 20th century and the ways in which they shaped educational practices for rural women in the United States: (a) the formalization of home economics as a post-secondary academic discipline, which set the stage for legislative developments; (b) the passage of the Smith-Lever Act, which institutionalized extension programs housed at land-grant colleges and universities; and (c) the passage of the Smith-Hughes Act, which brought vocational training, inclusive of home economics, to the lower schools. Collectively, these programs and policies provide insight into the complexity of the relationship between rural women and higher education, highlighting why some rural women participated in post-secondary education while others were not heavily present on college and university campuses but were still engaged in specific educational practices, often led by colleges and universities.","PeriodicalId":36686,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Women and Gender in Higher Education","volume":"15 1","pages":"293 - 307"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rural Women, Higher Education, and the Mixed Legacies of Early 20th Century Domestic Science Initiatives\",\"authors\":\"Kathleen E. Gillon\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/26379112.2022.2100999\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Today, institutions of higher education enroll rural students, and specifically rural women, at rates lower than their urban counterparts (Flora et al., 2018). Additionally, the disciplines of teaching and home economics continue to dominate the curricular choices of rural women. As higher education scholars continue to explore these phenomena, a historical understanding of the relationship between rural women and education in the United States can provide an important context for scholarship about these educational patterns.This article explores the mixed legacies of three educational programs/policies implemented in the early 20th century and the ways in which they shaped educational practices for rural women in the United States: (a) the formalization of home economics as a post-secondary academic discipline, which set the stage for legislative developments; (b) the passage of the Smith-Lever Act, which institutionalized extension programs housed at land-grant colleges and universities; and (c) the passage of the Smith-Hughes Act, which brought vocational training, inclusive of home economics, to the lower schools. Collectively, these programs and policies provide insight into the complexity of the relationship between rural women and higher education, highlighting why some rural women participated in post-secondary education while others were not heavily present on college and university campuses but were still engaged in specific educational practices, often led by colleges and universities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36686,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Women and Gender in Higher Education\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"293 - 307\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Women and Gender in Higher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/26379112.2022.2100999\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Women and Gender in Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/26379112.2022.2100999","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

如今,高等教育机构招收农村学生,特别是农村妇女的比例低于城市学生(Flora等人,2018)。此外,教学和家政学科继续主导着农村妇女的课程选择。随着高等教育学者对这些现象的不断探索,对美国农村妇女与教育之间关系的历史理解可以为研究这些教育模式提供重要的背景。本文探讨了20世纪初实施的三项教育计划/政策的混合遗产,以及它们塑造美国农村妇女教育实践的方式:(a)家政学作为中学后学术学科的正式化,为立法发展奠定了基础;(b) 通过了《史密斯杠杆法案》,该法案将土地补助学院和大学的推广计划制度化;以及(c)通过了《史密斯-休斯法案》,该法案为低年级学校提供了包括家政在内的职业培训。总的来说,这些方案和政策让人们深入了解了农村妇女与高等教育之间关系的复杂性,突显了为什么一些农村妇女参加了中学后教育,而另一些农村妇女则没有大量出现在学院和大学校园,但仍在从事特定的教育实践,通常由学院和大学领导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rural Women, Higher Education, and the Mixed Legacies of Early 20th Century Domestic Science Initiatives
Today, institutions of higher education enroll rural students, and specifically rural women, at rates lower than their urban counterparts (Flora et al., 2018). Additionally, the disciplines of teaching and home economics continue to dominate the curricular choices of rural women. As higher education scholars continue to explore these phenomena, a historical understanding of the relationship between rural women and education in the United States can provide an important context for scholarship about these educational patterns.This article explores the mixed legacies of three educational programs/policies implemented in the early 20th century and the ways in which they shaped educational practices for rural women in the United States: (a) the formalization of home economics as a post-secondary academic discipline, which set the stage for legislative developments; (b) the passage of the Smith-Lever Act, which institutionalized extension programs housed at land-grant colleges and universities; and (c) the passage of the Smith-Hughes Act, which brought vocational training, inclusive of home economics, to the lower schools. Collectively, these programs and policies provide insight into the complexity of the relationship between rural women and higher education, highlighting why some rural women participated in post-secondary education while others were not heavily present on college and university campuses but were still engaged in specific educational practices, often led by colleges and universities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Women and Gender in Higher Education
Journal of Women and Gender in Higher Education Social Sciences-Gender Studies
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信