加巴喷丁、褪黑素和右美沙芬在髋部骨折手术全麻后疼痛管理中的术前疗效比较:一项随机临床试验

IF 0.7 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
H. Modir, Behnam Mahmoodiyeh, Mehran Azami, Armita Behnamimoghadam, A. Almasi-Hashiani
{"title":"加巴喷丁、褪黑素和右美沙芬在髋部骨折手术全麻后疼痛管理中的术前疗效比较:一项随机临床试验","authors":"H. Modir, Behnam Mahmoodiyeh, Mehran Azami, Armita Behnamimoghadam, A. Almasi-Hashiani","doi":"10.4103/epj.epj_61_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background The effectiveness of postoperative pain relief regimens is well established and postulated to rely on diverse factors. Objective The aim of this study was to compare the effect of gabapentin and melatonin and dextromethorphan on postoperative pain control in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery under general anesthesia. Patients and methods In a double-blind controlled trial 125 patients requiring hip fracture surgery enrollment into the study after following ethical approval and informed participant consent. The patients were randomized to either each of the three regimens (gabapentin, melatonin, and dextromethorphan) by the block-randomization method. Outcome measurements were of foremost importance, patient’s pain scores throughout the recovery time and scheduled postoperative time intervals (2, 4, 6, 12, 24 h), doses of opioid use (mg) in the initial 24 h, and at length, sedation levels using the Ramsay scoring system at the early postoperative time intervals. Moreover, complications including chills, nausea, vomiting, and decreased consciousness were recorded. Statistical data analysis conducted by analysis of variance, χ2, and repeated measurements through SPSS, version 20. Results Gabapentin-treated patients manifested the lowest blood pressures (P<0.05), with maximum pain relief being experienced, sedation level being greater (P<0.05), and opioid use being lower in the group (P=0.0001). Conclusion We have the impression that gabapentin could be connected with improving pain relief and sedation, whereas opioid use was observed comparatively lower in the initial 24 h, and hence inferentially. The premedication can be driven to be superior in creating favorable conditions for analgesia and sedation and effective in preventing complications requiring treatment within 24 h postoperatively versus baseline and promisingly suggested to be continued for postoperative pain management, procedural sedation quality improvement, and opioid use reduction within the initial 24 h.","PeriodicalId":11568,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Pharmaceutical Journal","volume":"21 1","pages":"117 - 123"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative premedication efficacy of gabapentin, melatonin, and dextromethorphan in postoperative pain management following general anesthesia in hip fracture surgery: a randomized clinical trial\",\"authors\":\"H. Modir, Behnam Mahmoodiyeh, Mehran Azami, Armita Behnamimoghadam, A. Almasi-Hashiani\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/epj.epj_61_21\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background The effectiveness of postoperative pain relief regimens is well established and postulated to rely on diverse factors. Objective The aim of this study was to compare the effect of gabapentin and melatonin and dextromethorphan on postoperative pain control in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery under general anesthesia. Patients and methods In a double-blind controlled trial 125 patients requiring hip fracture surgery enrollment into the study after following ethical approval and informed participant consent. The patients were randomized to either each of the three regimens (gabapentin, melatonin, and dextromethorphan) by the block-randomization method. Outcome measurements were of foremost importance, patient’s pain scores throughout the recovery time and scheduled postoperative time intervals (2, 4, 6, 12, 24 h), doses of opioid use (mg) in the initial 24 h, and at length, sedation levels using the Ramsay scoring system at the early postoperative time intervals. Moreover, complications including chills, nausea, vomiting, and decreased consciousness were recorded. Statistical data analysis conducted by analysis of variance, χ2, and repeated measurements through SPSS, version 20. Results Gabapentin-treated patients manifested the lowest blood pressures (P<0.05), with maximum pain relief being experienced, sedation level being greater (P<0.05), and opioid use being lower in the group (P=0.0001). Conclusion We have the impression that gabapentin could be connected with improving pain relief and sedation, whereas opioid use was observed comparatively lower in the initial 24 h, and hence inferentially. The premedication can be driven to be superior in creating favorable conditions for analgesia and sedation and effective in preventing complications requiring treatment within 24 h postoperatively versus baseline and promisingly suggested to be continued for postoperative pain management, procedural sedation quality improvement, and opioid use reduction within the initial 24 h.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11568,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Egyptian Pharmaceutical Journal\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"117 - 123\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Egyptian Pharmaceutical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/epj.epj_61_21\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Pharmaceutical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/epj.epj_61_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景术后镇痛方案的有效性是公认的,并被认为依赖于多种因素。目的比较加巴喷丁、褪黑素和右美沙芬对全麻下髋部骨折术后疼痛控制的效果。患者和方法在一项双盲对照试验中,125名需要髋关节骨折手术的患者在获得伦理批准和知情参与者同意后加入研究。采用分组随机化方法,将患者随机分为三种方案(加巴喷丁、褪黑素和右美沙芬)。结果测量是最重要的,患者在整个恢复时间内的疼痛评分和计划的术后时间间隔(2、4、6、12、24 h) ,最初24小时的阿片类药物使用剂量(mg) h、 以及最终使用Ramsay评分系统在术后早期时间间隔的镇静水平。此外,还记录了包括发冷、恶心、呕吐和意识下降在内的并发症。统计数据分析采用方差分析、χ2和重复测量,使用SPSS 20版进行。结果加巴喷丁治疗组患者血压最低(P<0.05),疼痛缓解最大,镇静水平较高(P<0.01),阿片类药物使用率较低(P=0.0001) h、 因此是推理性的。术前用药可以在为镇痛和镇静创造有利条件方面发挥优势,并在24小时内有效预防需要治疗的并发症 术后h与基线相比,并有望在最初的24小时内继续用于术后疼痛管理、程序镇静质量改善和阿片类药物使用减少 h。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative premedication efficacy of gabapentin, melatonin, and dextromethorphan in postoperative pain management following general anesthesia in hip fracture surgery: a randomized clinical trial
Background The effectiveness of postoperative pain relief regimens is well established and postulated to rely on diverse factors. Objective The aim of this study was to compare the effect of gabapentin and melatonin and dextromethorphan on postoperative pain control in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery under general anesthesia. Patients and methods In a double-blind controlled trial 125 patients requiring hip fracture surgery enrollment into the study after following ethical approval and informed participant consent. The patients were randomized to either each of the three regimens (gabapentin, melatonin, and dextromethorphan) by the block-randomization method. Outcome measurements were of foremost importance, patient’s pain scores throughout the recovery time and scheduled postoperative time intervals (2, 4, 6, 12, 24 h), doses of opioid use (mg) in the initial 24 h, and at length, sedation levels using the Ramsay scoring system at the early postoperative time intervals. Moreover, complications including chills, nausea, vomiting, and decreased consciousness were recorded. Statistical data analysis conducted by analysis of variance, χ2, and repeated measurements through SPSS, version 20. Results Gabapentin-treated patients manifested the lowest blood pressures (P<0.05), with maximum pain relief being experienced, sedation level being greater (P<0.05), and opioid use being lower in the group (P=0.0001). Conclusion We have the impression that gabapentin could be connected with improving pain relief and sedation, whereas opioid use was observed comparatively lower in the initial 24 h, and hence inferentially. The premedication can be driven to be superior in creating favorable conditions for analgesia and sedation and effective in preventing complications requiring treatment within 24 h postoperatively versus baseline and promisingly suggested to be continued for postoperative pain management, procedural sedation quality improvement, and opioid use reduction within the initial 24 h.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Egyptian Pharmaceutical Journal
Egyptian Pharmaceutical Journal PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信