挥发性和半挥发性萜烯影响叶片可燃性:根据萜烯鉴定水平的差异

IF 1.6 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Anne Ganteaume, Bastien Romero, Catherine Fernandez, Elena Ormeño, Caroline Lecareux
{"title":"挥发性和半挥发性萜烯影响叶片可燃性:根据萜烯鉴定水平的差异","authors":"Anne Ganteaume,&nbsp;Bastien Romero,&nbsp;Catherine Fernandez,&nbsp;Elena Ormeño,&nbsp;Caroline Lecareux","doi":"10.1007/s00049-021-00349-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In flammability assessment, the terpene effect is usually studied using their total or subgroup content, missing, therefore, the information that could be provided by the molecules themselves. In this study, the specific role of terpenes on leaf flammability was sought comparing different levels of terpene identification—total, subgroup (i.e. mono-, sesqui-, and diterpene), and single compound—as well as their interactions with fuel moisture content (FMC) in four species common in Mediterranean Wildland–Urban Interfaces (<i>Pinus halepensis</i>, <i>Cupressocyparis leylandii</i>, <i>Hesperocyparis arizonica</i>, <i>Cupressus sempervirens</i>). <i>Pinus halepensis</i> was the most flammable species (low FMC and higher sesquiterpene content but low terpene diversity) while <i>Cupressocyparis leylandii</i> presented the highest terpene diversity and total terpene content (higher mono- and diterpene content). Flammability was differently affected according to the terpene identification level used in the models. The effects ranged from non-significant for most species studied, using subgroup or total terpene content, to mostly significant, using single compound content. Regarding the former, the lack of significant results could be due to opposite effects of different single compounds within a terpene subgroup. For the latter, terpene molecules driving flammability and their effects (positive or negative) differed among species. A cumulative effect with FMC was also highlighted in some cases but terpenes mostly remained the main flammability drivers regardless of the species. Using the refined terpene level in modelling allowed a better understanding of the compounds’ role on flammability, which is useful in the identification of plant traits linked to flammability.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":515,"journal":{"name":"Chemoecology","volume":"31 4","pages":"259 - 275"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00049-021-00349-1","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Volatile and semi-volatile terpenes impact leaf flammability: differences according to the level of terpene identification\",\"authors\":\"Anne Ganteaume,&nbsp;Bastien Romero,&nbsp;Catherine Fernandez,&nbsp;Elena Ormeño,&nbsp;Caroline Lecareux\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00049-021-00349-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In flammability assessment, the terpene effect is usually studied using their total or subgroup content, missing, therefore, the information that could be provided by the molecules themselves. In this study, the specific role of terpenes on leaf flammability was sought comparing different levels of terpene identification—total, subgroup (i.e. mono-, sesqui-, and diterpene), and single compound—as well as their interactions with fuel moisture content (FMC) in four species common in Mediterranean Wildland–Urban Interfaces (<i>Pinus halepensis</i>, <i>Cupressocyparis leylandii</i>, <i>Hesperocyparis arizonica</i>, <i>Cupressus sempervirens</i>). <i>Pinus halepensis</i> was the most flammable species (low FMC and higher sesquiterpene content but low terpene diversity) while <i>Cupressocyparis leylandii</i> presented the highest terpene diversity and total terpene content (higher mono- and diterpene content). Flammability was differently affected according to the terpene identification level used in the models. The effects ranged from non-significant for most species studied, using subgroup or total terpene content, to mostly significant, using single compound content. Regarding the former, the lack of significant results could be due to opposite effects of different single compounds within a terpene subgroup. For the latter, terpene molecules driving flammability and their effects (positive or negative) differed among species. A cumulative effect with FMC was also highlighted in some cases but terpenes mostly remained the main flammability drivers regardless of the species. Using the refined terpene level in modelling allowed a better understanding of the compounds’ role on flammability, which is useful in the identification of plant traits linked to flammability.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":515,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chemoecology\",\"volume\":\"31 4\",\"pages\":\"259 - 275\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00049-021-00349-1\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chemoecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00049-021-00349-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemoecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00049-021-00349-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

在可燃性评价中,萜烯效应通常是用它们的总含量或亚基含量来研究的,因此,缺少了分子本身可以提供的信息。在本研究中,通过比较不同水平的萜烯鉴定——总萜、亚萜(即单萜、倍萜类和二萜类)和单一化合物——以及它们与燃料含水量(FMC)的相互作用,探讨了萜烯对地中海野地-城市交界区常见的四种物种(松、leylandii柏树、Hesperocyparis arizonica柏树和sempervirens)的叶片可燃性的具体作用。松(Pinus halepensis)是最易燃的树种(FMC低,倍半萜含量高,但萜烯多样性低),雷公柏(curessocyparis leylandii)具有最高的萜烯多样性和总萜含量(较高的单萜和二萜含量)。根据模型中使用的萜烯鉴定水平,可燃性受到不同程度的影响。使用亚群或总萜烯含量对大多数物种的影响不显著,而使用单一化合物含量对大多数物种的影响显著。对于前者,缺乏显著结果可能是由于萜烯亚群内不同单一化合物的相反作用。对于后者,萜烯分子驱动可燃性及其影响(积极或消极)因物种而异。在某些情况下,FMC的累积效应也被强调,但无论物种如何,萜烯大多仍然是主要的可燃性驱动因素。在建模中使用精炼的萜烯水平可以更好地理解化合物对可燃性的作用,这对于识别与可燃性相关的植物性状很有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Volatile and semi-volatile terpenes impact leaf flammability: differences according to the level of terpene identification

In flammability assessment, the terpene effect is usually studied using their total or subgroup content, missing, therefore, the information that could be provided by the molecules themselves. In this study, the specific role of terpenes on leaf flammability was sought comparing different levels of terpene identification—total, subgroup (i.e. mono-, sesqui-, and diterpene), and single compound—as well as their interactions with fuel moisture content (FMC) in four species common in Mediterranean Wildland–Urban Interfaces (Pinus halepensis, Cupressocyparis leylandii, Hesperocyparis arizonica, Cupressus sempervirens). Pinus halepensis was the most flammable species (low FMC and higher sesquiterpene content but low terpene diversity) while Cupressocyparis leylandii presented the highest terpene diversity and total terpene content (higher mono- and diterpene content). Flammability was differently affected according to the terpene identification level used in the models. The effects ranged from non-significant for most species studied, using subgroup or total terpene content, to mostly significant, using single compound content. Regarding the former, the lack of significant results could be due to opposite effects of different single compounds within a terpene subgroup. For the latter, terpene molecules driving flammability and their effects (positive or negative) differed among species. A cumulative effect with FMC was also highlighted in some cases but terpenes mostly remained the main flammability drivers regardless of the species. Using the refined terpene level in modelling allowed a better understanding of the compounds’ role on flammability, which is useful in the identification of plant traits linked to flammability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Chemoecology
Chemoecology 环境科学-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: It is the aim of Chemoecology to promote and stimulate basic science in the field of chemical ecology by publishing research papers that integrate evolution and/or ecology and chemistry in an attempt to increase our understanding of the biological significance of natural products. Its scopes cover the evolutionary biology, mechanisms and chemistry of biotic interactions and the evolution and synthesis of the underlying natural products. Manuscripts on the evolution and ecology of trophic relationships, intra- and interspecific communication, competition, and other kinds of chemical communication in all types of organismic interactions will be considered suitable for publication. Ecological studies of trophic interactions will be considered also if they are based on the information of the transmission of natural products (e.g. fatty acids) through the food-chain. Chemoecology further publishes papers that relate to the evolution and ecology of interactions mediated by non-volatile compounds (e.g. adhesive secretions). Mechanistic approaches may include the identification, biosynthesis and metabolism of substances that carry information and the elucidation of receptor- and transduction systems using physiological, biochemical and molecular techniques. Papers describing the structure and functional morphology of organs involved in chemical communication will also be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信