{"title":"评估发展中国家心理健康系统的成熟度","authors":"Akihiro Nishio, Toshiyuki Marutani","doi":"10.1002/pcn5.109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Given the need for a simple tool to evaluate mental healthcare provision at the local level, we compared the duration of untreated mental illness (DUM) and duration of untreated psychosis (DUP) between rural and urban areas in Cambodia, and Cambodia's DUP was also compared with that of other countries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>DUM and background data were obtained at the first consultation from 940 participants in Phnom Penh (PP), the capital city, and Siem Reap province (SR) in 2016-2017. DUP data were obtained from DUM by excluding individuals with nonpsychotic mental illnesses (e.g., mood disorders, neurotic disorders, substance use, epilepsy). Student's <i>t</i>-test was used to compare DUM and DUP, and analysis of variance was conducted to identify associations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean DUM significantly differed between PP (0.6 [SD 2.3] years) and SR (4.2 [5.9] years). Mean DUP was also significantly different (0.5 [2.2] years in PP vs. 4.3 [6.7] years in SR). DUM was strongly associated with DUP. The prevalence of the various disorders differed between rural and urban areas. DUM also varied by diagnosis, indicating that DUP is a better index than DUM. However, in some cases DUM can be used, given its strong association with DUP. DUP in PP was almost the same as in developed countries and was about four times longer in SR.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DUP in rural areas is much longer than in urban areas in developing countries. Although DUP is an effective index, more data from other places and before/after interventions are required to verify it further.</p>","PeriodicalId":74405,"journal":{"name":"PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences","volume":" ","pages":"e109"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11114372/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the maturation of mental health systems in developing countries.\",\"authors\":\"Akihiro Nishio, Toshiyuki Marutani\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pcn5.109\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Given the need for a simple tool to evaluate mental healthcare provision at the local level, we compared the duration of untreated mental illness (DUM) and duration of untreated psychosis (DUP) between rural and urban areas in Cambodia, and Cambodia's DUP was also compared with that of other countries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>DUM and background data were obtained at the first consultation from 940 participants in Phnom Penh (PP), the capital city, and Siem Reap province (SR) in 2016-2017. DUP data were obtained from DUM by excluding individuals with nonpsychotic mental illnesses (e.g., mood disorders, neurotic disorders, substance use, epilepsy). Student's <i>t</i>-test was used to compare DUM and DUP, and analysis of variance was conducted to identify associations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean DUM significantly differed between PP (0.6 [SD 2.3] years) and SR (4.2 [5.9] years). Mean DUP was also significantly different (0.5 [2.2] years in PP vs. 4.3 [6.7] years in SR). DUM was strongly associated with DUP. The prevalence of the various disorders differed between rural and urban areas. DUM also varied by diagnosis, indicating that DUP is a better index than DUM. However, in some cases DUM can be used, given its strong association with DUP. DUP in PP was almost the same as in developed countries and was about four times longer in SR.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DUP in rural areas is much longer than in urban areas in developing countries. Although DUP is an effective index, more data from other places and before/after interventions are required to verify it further.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74405,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e109\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11114372/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pcn5.109\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pcn5.109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:鉴于需要一种简单的工具来评估地方一级的精神卫生保健服务,我们比较了柬埔寨城乡地区未经治疗的精神病(DUM)和未经治疗的精神病(DUP)的持续时间,并将柬埔寨的DUP与其他国家的DUP进行了比较:2016-2017年,在首都金边(PP)和暹粒省(SR)的940名参与者的首次咨询中获得了DUM和背景数据。通过排除非精神病性精神疾病(如情绪障碍、神经症、药物使用、癫痫)患者,从 DUM 中获取 DUP 数据。采用学生 t 检验比较 DUM 和 DUP,并进行方差分析以确定相关性:结果:PP(0.6 [SD 2.3]岁)和 SR(4.2 [5.9]岁)的平均 DUM 有明显差异。平均 DUP 也有显著差异(PP 为 0.5 [2.2] 年,SR 为 4.3 [6.7] 年)。DUM与DUP密切相关。农村和城市地区的各种失调症患病率不同。DUM 也因诊断而异,这表明 DUP 比 DUM 是更好的指标。然而,在某些情况下,鉴于 DUM 与 DUP 的密切联系,也可以使用 DUM。PP 的 DUP 几乎与发达国家相同,而 SR 的 DUP 长约四倍:结论:发展中国家农村地区的 DUP 比城市地区要长得多。尽管 DUP 是一个有效的指标,但还需要更多来自其他地方和干预前后的数据来进一步验证。
Evaluating the maturation of mental health systems in developing countries.
Background: Given the need for a simple tool to evaluate mental healthcare provision at the local level, we compared the duration of untreated mental illness (DUM) and duration of untreated psychosis (DUP) between rural and urban areas in Cambodia, and Cambodia's DUP was also compared with that of other countries.
Methods: DUM and background data were obtained at the first consultation from 940 participants in Phnom Penh (PP), the capital city, and Siem Reap province (SR) in 2016-2017. DUP data were obtained from DUM by excluding individuals with nonpsychotic mental illnesses (e.g., mood disorders, neurotic disorders, substance use, epilepsy). Student's t-test was used to compare DUM and DUP, and analysis of variance was conducted to identify associations.
Results: Mean DUM significantly differed between PP (0.6 [SD 2.3] years) and SR (4.2 [5.9] years). Mean DUP was also significantly different (0.5 [2.2] years in PP vs. 4.3 [6.7] years in SR). DUM was strongly associated with DUP. The prevalence of the various disorders differed between rural and urban areas. DUM also varied by diagnosis, indicating that DUP is a better index than DUM. However, in some cases DUM can be used, given its strong association with DUP. DUP in PP was almost the same as in developed countries and was about four times longer in SR.
Conclusion: DUP in rural areas is much longer than in urban areas in developing countries. Although DUP is an effective index, more data from other places and before/after interventions are required to verify it further.