体制改革和收入分配:来自转型后欧盟国家的证据

IF 0.9 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS
Panoeconomicus Pub Date : 2020-06-23 DOI:10.2298/pan2003309j
Kosta Josifidis, Novica Supic, S. Bodor
{"title":"体制改革和收入分配:来自转型后欧盟国家的证据","authors":"Kosta Josifidis, Novica Supic, S. Bodor","doi":"10.2298/pan2003309j","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper provides an explanation of income dynamics in the posttransition\n EU countries from the perspective of institutional changes. As a result of\n seemingly-unrelated regressions analysis on panel data from 1990-2014, we\n find robust evidence of the relationship between income shares and\n institutional reforms. The impact of reforms on the top and below-average\n income shares is negative, whereas this effect on above above-average income\n share is positive. Decline of income share for the richest class during the\n post-transitional period can be attributed to the loss of privileges\n associated with the existence of an institutional vacuum in the first years\n of transition. Although transition increased wages for workers at the end of\n income distribution, the job losses had a stronger effect than wage\n increase, so the overall effect on income share of this group is negative.\n The winners of reforms appear as the workers with above-average income,\n whose skills are complementary to the changes instituted by transition to\n market economy and integration in the EU.","PeriodicalId":45222,"journal":{"name":"Panoeconomicus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Institutional reforms and income distribution: Evidence from post-transition EU countries\",\"authors\":\"Kosta Josifidis, Novica Supic, S. Bodor\",\"doi\":\"10.2298/pan2003309j\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper provides an explanation of income dynamics in the posttransition\\n EU countries from the perspective of institutional changes. As a result of\\n seemingly-unrelated regressions analysis on panel data from 1990-2014, we\\n find robust evidence of the relationship between income shares and\\n institutional reforms. The impact of reforms on the top and below-average\\n income shares is negative, whereas this effect on above above-average income\\n share is positive. Decline of income share for the richest class during the\\n post-transitional period can be attributed to the loss of privileges\\n associated with the existence of an institutional vacuum in the first years\\n of transition. Although transition increased wages for workers at the end of\\n income distribution, the job losses had a stronger effect than wage\\n increase, so the overall effect on income share of this group is negative.\\n The winners of reforms appear as the workers with above-average income,\\n whose skills are complementary to the changes instituted by transition to\\n market economy and integration in the EU.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45222,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Panoeconomicus\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Panoeconomicus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2298/pan2003309j\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Panoeconomicus","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/pan2003309j","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本文从制度变迁的角度解释了转型后欧盟国家的收入动态。通过对1990-2014年面板数据进行看似不相关的回归分析,我们发现了收入份额与制度改革之间关系的有力证据。改革对收入最高和低于平均水平的份额的影响是负面的,而对高于平均水平的收入份额的影响则是正面的。在后过渡时期,最富有阶层的收入份额下降,可归因于在过渡的头几年,由于体制真空的存在而失去了特权。尽管转型在收入分配结束时提高了工人的工资,但失业的影响比工资增长更大,因此对这一群体收入份额的总体影响是负面的。改革的赢家似乎是收入高于平均水平的工人,他们的技能与向市场经济转型和欧盟一体化所带来的变化相辅相成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Institutional reforms and income distribution: Evidence from post-transition EU countries
This paper provides an explanation of income dynamics in the posttransition EU countries from the perspective of institutional changes. As a result of seemingly-unrelated regressions analysis on panel data from 1990-2014, we find robust evidence of the relationship between income shares and institutional reforms. The impact of reforms on the top and below-average income shares is negative, whereas this effect on above above-average income share is positive. Decline of income share for the richest class during the post-transitional period can be attributed to the loss of privileges associated with the existence of an institutional vacuum in the first years of transition. Although transition increased wages for workers at the end of income distribution, the job losses had a stronger effect than wage increase, so the overall effect on income share of this group is negative. The winners of reforms appear as the workers with above-average income, whose skills are complementary to the changes instituted by transition to market economy and integration in the EU.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Panoeconomicus
Panoeconomicus ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
10.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
40 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信