{"title":"体制改革和收入分配:来自转型后欧盟国家的证据","authors":"Kosta Josifidis, Novica Supic, S. Bodor","doi":"10.2298/pan2003309j","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper provides an explanation of income dynamics in the posttransition\n EU countries from the perspective of institutional changes. As a result of\n seemingly-unrelated regressions analysis on panel data from 1990-2014, we\n find robust evidence of the relationship between income shares and\n institutional reforms. The impact of reforms on the top and below-average\n income shares is negative, whereas this effect on above above-average income\n share is positive. Decline of income share for the richest class during the\n post-transitional period can be attributed to the loss of privileges\n associated with the existence of an institutional vacuum in the first years\n of transition. Although transition increased wages for workers at the end of\n income distribution, the job losses had a stronger effect than wage\n increase, so the overall effect on income share of this group is negative.\n The winners of reforms appear as the workers with above-average income,\n whose skills are complementary to the changes instituted by transition to\n market economy and integration in the EU.","PeriodicalId":45222,"journal":{"name":"Panoeconomicus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Institutional reforms and income distribution: Evidence from post-transition EU countries\",\"authors\":\"Kosta Josifidis, Novica Supic, S. Bodor\",\"doi\":\"10.2298/pan2003309j\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper provides an explanation of income dynamics in the posttransition\\n EU countries from the perspective of institutional changes. As a result of\\n seemingly-unrelated regressions analysis on panel data from 1990-2014, we\\n find robust evidence of the relationship between income shares and\\n institutional reforms. The impact of reforms on the top and below-average\\n income shares is negative, whereas this effect on above above-average income\\n share is positive. Decline of income share for the richest class during the\\n post-transitional period can be attributed to the loss of privileges\\n associated with the existence of an institutional vacuum in the first years\\n of transition. Although transition increased wages for workers at the end of\\n income distribution, the job losses had a stronger effect than wage\\n increase, so the overall effect on income share of this group is negative.\\n The winners of reforms appear as the workers with above-average income,\\n whose skills are complementary to the changes instituted by transition to\\n market economy and integration in the EU.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45222,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Panoeconomicus\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Panoeconomicus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2298/pan2003309j\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Panoeconomicus","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/pan2003309j","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Institutional reforms and income distribution: Evidence from post-transition EU countries
This paper provides an explanation of income dynamics in the posttransition
EU countries from the perspective of institutional changes. As a result of
seemingly-unrelated regressions analysis on panel data from 1990-2014, we
find robust evidence of the relationship between income shares and
institutional reforms. The impact of reforms on the top and below-average
income shares is negative, whereas this effect on above above-average income
share is positive. Decline of income share for the richest class during the
post-transitional period can be attributed to the loss of privileges
associated with the existence of an institutional vacuum in the first years
of transition. Although transition increased wages for workers at the end of
income distribution, the job losses had a stronger effect than wage
increase, so the overall effect on income share of this group is negative.
The winners of reforms appear as the workers with above-average income,
whose skills are complementary to the changes instituted by transition to
market economy and integration in the EU.