企业应用程序中人工智能的奥秘:走向统一框架

IF 3.7 3区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS
Heinz Herrmann
{"title":"企业应用程序中人工智能的奥秘:走向统一框架","authors":"Heinz Herrmann","doi":"10.1016/j.jengtecman.2022.101716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Disagreement and confusion about artificial intelligence (AI) terminology impede researchers, innovators, and practitioners when developing and implementing enterprise applications. The prevailing ambiguities and use of buzzwords are exacerbated by media and vendor marketing hype. This study identifies several ambiguities within and across AI fields and subfields. Combining a systematic review with a sequential mixed-models design, a total of 26,143 publications were reviewed and mapped, making this the largest conceptual study in the AI field. A unified framework is proposed as an Euler diagram to bring about clarity through a \"common language\" for AI researchers, innovators, and practitioners.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50209,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Engineering and Technology Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0923474822000467/pdfft?md5=7c9c380a9af40425ad1acb56079d4475&pid=1-s2.0-S0923474822000467-main.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The arcanum of artificial intelligence in enterprise applications: Toward a unified framework\",\"authors\":\"Heinz Herrmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jengtecman.2022.101716\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Disagreement and confusion about artificial intelligence (AI) terminology impede researchers, innovators, and practitioners when developing and implementing enterprise applications. The prevailing ambiguities and use of buzzwords are exacerbated by media and vendor marketing hype. This study identifies several ambiguities within and across AI fields and subfields. Combining a systematic review with a sequential mixed-models design, a total of 26,143 publications were reviewed and mapped, making this the largest conceptual study in the AI field. A unified framework is proposed as an Euler diagram to bring about clarity through a \\\"common language\\\" for AI researchers, innovators, and practitioners.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50209,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Engineering and Technology Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0923474822000467/pdfft?md5=7c9c380a9af40425ad1acb56079d4475&pid=1-s2.0-S0923474822000467-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Engineering and Technology Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0923474822000467\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Engineering and Technology Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0923474822000467","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在开发和实现企业应用程序时,对人工智能(AI)术语的分歧和混淆阻碍了研究人员、创新者和实践者。媒体和供应商的营销炒作加剧了流行的含糊性和流行语的使用。本研究确定了人工智能领域和子领域内部和之间的几个模糊之处。将系统回顾与顺序混合模型设计相结合,共回顾和绘制了26,143份出版物,使其成为人工智能领域最大的概念研究。提出了一个统一的框架,作为欧拉图,通过一种“共同语言”为人工智能研究人员、创新者和实践者带来清晰。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The arcanum of artificial intelligence in enterprise applications: Toward a unified framework

Disagreement and confusion about artificial intelligence (AI) terminology impede researchers, innovators, and practitioners when developing and implementing enterprise applications. The prevailing ambiguities and use of buzzwords are exacerbated by media and vendor marketing hype. This study identifies several ambiguities within and across AI fields and subfields. Combining a systematic review with a sequential mixed-models design, a total of 26,143 publications were reviewed and mapped, making this the largest conceptual study in the AI field. A unified framework is proposed as an Euler diagram to bring about clarity through a "common language" for AI researchers, innovators, and practitioners.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
29
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Engineering and Technology Management (JET-M) is an international scholarly refereed research journal which aims to promote the theory and practice of technology, innovation, and engineering management. The journal links engineering, science, and management disciplines. It addresses the issues involved in the planning, development, and implementation of technological capabilities to shape and accomplish the strategic and operational objectives of an organization. It covers not only R&D management, but also the entire spectrum of managerial concerns in technology-based organizations. This includes issues relating to new product development, human resource management, innovation process management, project management, technological fusion, marketing, technological forecasting and strategic planning. The journal provides an interface between technology and other corporate functions, such as R&D, marketing, manufacturing and administration. Its ultimate goal is to make a profound contribution to theory development, research and practice by serving as a leading forum for the publication of scholarly research on all aspects of technology, innovation, and engineering management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信