公立大学讲师知识管理中的适宜技术

C. C.
{"title":"公立大学讲师知识管理中的适宜技术","authors":"C. C.","doi":"10.22158/FET.V2N2P108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this research objective was to studies appropriate technology for knowledge management in the case of public university lecturers. Using the Delphi technique, the researcher conducted interviews with twenty experts involved in education administration, academic affairs, and knowledge management at institutes, faculties, offices, and educational institutions. Data were collected from the experts three times. The first round involved structured interviews. The second and third rounds involved the use of a five-rating scale questionnaire. Computing the median for the data collected from the experts. Thence the median was determined for the lower and upper quartiles. The values for the criteria used by the researcher were a median at the high level upwards greater than 3.50 (Md>3.50) with a concomitant interquartile range of less than 1.50 (>1.50). Findings show that appropriate technology in knowledge management for public university lecturers as agreed by experts consists of five aspects: (1) knowledge acquisition; (2) knowledge creation; (3) knowledge storage and access; (4) knowledge sharing; (5) learning. Of the 37 items appropriate technology found at the highest level pertains to 15 items. At a high level 22 items are found. The median ranged from 3.72 to 4.95 and the interquartile range was from 0.25 to 1.19.","PeriodicalId":93436,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in education technology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Appropriate Technology in Knowledge Management for Public University Lecturers\",\"authors\":\"C. C.\",\"doi\":\"10.22158/FET.V2N2P108\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this research objective was to studies appropriate technology for knowledge management in the case of public university lecturers. Using the Delphi technique, the researcher conducted interviews with twenty experts involved in education administration, academic affairs, and knowledge management at institutes, faculties, offices, and educational institutions. Data were collected from the experts three times. The first round involved structured interviews. The second and third rounds involved the use of a five-rating scale questionnaire. Computing the median for the data collected from the experts. Thence the median was determined for the lower and upper quartiles. The values for the criteria used by the researcher were a median at the high level upwards greater than 3.50 (Md>3.50) with a concomitant interquartile range of less than 1.50 (>1.50). Findings show that appropriate technology in knowledge management for public university lecturers as agreed by experts consists of five aspects: (1) knowledge acquisition; (2) knowledge creation; (3) knowledge storage and access; (4) knowledge sharing; (5) learning. Of the 37 items appropriate technology found at the highest level pertains to 15 items. At a high level 22 items are found. The median ranged from 3.72 to 4.95 and the interquartile range was from 0.25 to 1.19.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93436,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in education technology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in education technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22158/FET.V2N2P108\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in education technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22158/FET.V2N2P108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这项研究中,目的是在公立大学讲师的情况下研究知识管理的适当技术。利用德尔菲技术,研究人员采访了20位研究所、学院、办公室和教育机构的教育管理、学术事务和知识管理专家。从专家那里收集了三次数据。第一轮是结构化访谈。第二轮和第三轮涉及使用五级量表调查表。计算从专家那里收集的数据的中位数。此后,确定了下四分位数和上四分位数的中位数。研究人员使用的标准值在高水平上的中位数大于3.50(Md>3.50),同时四分位间距小于1.50(>1.50)。研究结果表明,专家们同意的公立大学讲师知识管理的适当技术包括五个方面:(1)知识获取;(2) 知识创造;(3) 知识存储和获取;(4) 知识共享;(5) 学习。在37个项目中,最高级别的适当技术涉及15个项目。在高水平上发现了22个项目。中位数为3.72至4.95,四分位间距为0.25至1.19。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Appropriate Technology in Knowledge Management for Public University Lecturers
In this research objective was to studies appropriate technology for knowledge management in the case of public university lecturers. Using the Delphi technique, the researcher conducted interviews with twenty experts involved in education administration, academic affairs, and knowledge management at institutes, faculties, offices, and educational institutions. Data were collected from the experts three times. The first round involved structured interviews. The second and third rounds involved the use of a five-rating scale questionnaire. Computing the median for the data collected from the experts. Thence the median was determined for the lower and upper quartiles. The values for the criteria used by the researcher were a median at the high level upwards greater than 3.50 (Md>3.50) with a concomitant interquartile range of less than 1.50 (>1.50). Findings show that appropriate technology in knowledge management for public university lecturers as agreed by experts consists of five aspects: (1) knowledge acquisition; (2) knowledge creation; (3) knowledge storage and access; (4) knowledge sharing; (5) learning. Of the 37 items appropriate technology found at the highest level pertains to 15 items. At a high level 22 items are found. The median ranged from 3.72 to 4.95 and the interquartile range was from 0.25 to 1.19.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信