“优化用户体验”:优化技术与模拟生活,从模型到算法

Q3 Social Sciences
R. Uliasz
{"title":"“优化用户体验”:优化技术与模拟生活,从模型到算法","authors":"R. Uliasz","doi":"10.1080/15358593.2021.1934523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article takes up the issue of optimization to consider the relationship between predictive algorithms and platform user experience. Corporate data analytic practices increasingly rely on machine learning algorithms that apply models to user behaviors, producing “knowledge” about users that can be bought and sold. This article considers the opacity of algorithms today in relation to optimization. Using a conceptual apparatus that draws from the study of cultural techniques, the following argues that optimization—the task of finding a sufficient solution to a well-defined problem—makes use of models to simulate possible answers to problems around the incomputablity of behavior. Tracing a set of examples that deal with the problem of predicting behavior—the “minimum point” problem, John von Neumann's automata theory, and the Facebook pixel—optimization is characterized by a shift from statistical model making towards predictive and algorithmic techniques. This shift is seen within the context of the decline of Cold War rationality towards the embeddedness of “intelligent” algorithms across technoculture.","PeriodicalId":53587,"journal":{"name":"Review of Communication","volume":"21 1","pages":"129 - 143"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15358593.2021.1934523","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Optimize user experience”: optimization techniques and the simulation of life, from the model to the algorithm\",\"authors\":\"R. Uliasz\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15358593.2021.1934523\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article takes up the issue of optimization to consider the relationship between predictive algorithms and platform user experience. Corporate data analytic practices increasingly rely on machine learning algorithms that apply models to user behaviors, producing “knowledge” about users that can be bought and sold. This article considers the opacity of algorithms today in relation to optimization. Using a conceptual apparatus that draws from the study of cultural techniques, the following argues that optimization—the task of finding a sufficient solution to a well-defined problem—makes use of models to simulate possible answers to problems around the incomputablity of behavior. Tracing a set of examples that deal with the problem of predicting behavior—the “minimum point” problem, John von Neumann's automata theory, and the Facebook pixel—optimization is characterized by a shift from statistical model making towards predictive and algorithmic techniques. This shift is seen within the context of the decline of Cold War rationality towards the embeddedness of “intelligent” algorithms across technoculture.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53587,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Review of Communication\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"129 - 143\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15358593.2021.1934523\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Review of Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15358593.2021.1934523\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15358593.2021.1934523","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文讨论了优化问题,以考虑预测算法和平台用户体验之间的关系。企业数据分析实践越来越依赖于将模型应用于用户行为的机器学习算法,从而产生可以买卖的用户“知识”。本文考虑了当今算法在优化方面的不透明性。以下使用了一种从文化技术研究中汲取的概念装置,认为优化——为定义明确的问题找到充分解决方案的任务——利用模型来模拟行为不可理解性问题的可能答案。追踪一组处理预测行为问题的例子——“最低点”问题、约翰·冯·诺依曼的自动机理论和Facebook像素——优化的特点是从统计模型制作转向预测和算法技术。这种转变是在冷战理性向技术文化中“智能”算法嵌入性下降的背景下出现的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“Optimize user experience”: optimization techniques and the simulation of life, from the model to the algorithm
ABSTRACT This article takes up the issue of optimization to consider the relationship between predictive algorithms and platform user experience. Corporate data analytic practices increasingly rely on machine learning algorithms that apply models to user behaviors, producing “knowledge” about users that can be bought and sold. This article considers the opacity of algorithms today in relation to optimization. Using a conceptual apparatus that draws from the study of cultural techniques, the following argues that optimization—the task of finding a sufficient solution to a well-defined problem—makes use of models to simulate possible answers to problems around the incomputablity of behavior. Tracing a set of examples that deal with the problem of predicting behavior—the “minimum point” problem, John von Neumann's automata theory, and the Facebook pixel—optimization is characterized by a shift from statistical model making towards predictive and algorithmic techniques. This shift is seen within the context of the decline of Cold War rationality towards the embeddedness of “intelligent” algorithms across technoculture.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Review of Communication
Review of Communication Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信