尼日利亚职前科学、技术和数学教师的数字分心调查

IF 1.2 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Adeneye Olarewaju Adeleye Awofala, O. S. Olabiyi, Racheal O Okunuga, Omolabake Temilade Ojo, Adeyemi Abayomi Awofala, Abisola O. Lawani
{"title":"尼日利亚职前科学、技术和数学教师的数字分心调查","authors":"Adeneye Olarewaju Adeleye Awofala, O. S. Olabiyi, Racheal O Okunuga, Omolabake Temilade Ojo, Adeyemi Abayomi Awofala, Abisola O. Lawani","doi":"10.1344/der.2020.37.32-48","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Internationally, proliferation of digital technologies in classrooms has produced digital distractions among digital natives in this 21 st century. Thus, it is highly imperative to develop a suitable instrument for assessing and measuring digital distraction among higher education students to enable continuing research and practice. While previous studies had treated and measured digital distraction as a sub-component of a multi-dimensional construct and as a test, the present study through instrumentation survey research, developed and authenticated a standalone digital distraction scale among pre-service science, technology and mathematics (STM) teachers in Nigeria. The instrument is constructed by adopting a multidimensional standpoint of digital distraction around a higher-order modelling method. The pre-service STM teachers were recruited from a culturally varied university student population in Nigeria. The results showed a high level of digital distraction among the pre-service STM teachers in Nigeria and the digital distraction is composed of several connected yet distinctive factors (emotional distraction, digital addiction, and distraction by procrastination), with proof backing up a higher-order structural archetypal. More so, empirical evidence confirmed the measurement invariance of the scale with regards to gender and the consistency of the psychometric properties of the digital distraction scale. Finally, a test-retest reliability of the digital distraction scale showed that the scores are not variable over time and that the scale is not sensitive to alterations in the learning milieu. Finally, it is hoped that this tool will be handy for educators interested in isolating pre-service STM teachers at risk of high digital distraction which may cause lack of respect and privation of courtesy for instructors and personal distraction in the classroom.","PeriodicalId":44576,"journal":{"name":"Digital Education Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating Digital Distraction among Pre-service Science, Technology, and Mathematics Teachers in Nigeria\",\"authors\":\"Adeneye Olarewaju Adeleye Awofala, O. S. Olabiyi, Racheal O Okunuga, Omolabake Temilade Ojo, Adeyemi Abayomi Awofala, Abisola O. Lawani\",\"doi\":\"10.1344/der.2020.37.32-48\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Internationally, proliferation of digital technologies in classrooms has produced digital distractions among digital natives in this 21 st century. Thus, it is highly imperative to develop a suitable instrument for assessing and measuring digital distraction among higher education students to enable continuing research and practice. While previous studies had treated and measured digital distraction as a sub-component of a multi-dimensional construct and as a test, the present study through instrumentation survey research, developed and authenticated a standalone digital distraction scale among pre-service science, technology and mathematics (STM) teachers in Nigeria. The instrument is constructed by adopting a multidimensional standpoint of digital distraction around a higher-order modelling method. The pre-service STM teachers were recruited from a culturally varied university student population in Nigeria. The results showed a high level of digital distraction among the pre-service STM teachers in Nigeria and the digital distraction is composed of several connected yet distinctive factors (emotional distraction, digital addiction, and distraction by procrastination), with proof backing up a higher-order structural archetypal. More so, empirical evidence confirmed the measurement invariance of the scale with regards to gender and the consistency of the psychometric properties of the digital distraction scale. Finally, a test-retest reliability of the digital distraction scale showed that the scores are not variable over time and that the scale is not sensitive to alterations in the learning milieu. Finally, it is hoped that this tool will be handy for educators interested in isolating pre-service STM teachers at risk of high digital distraction which may cause lack of respect and privation of courtesy for instructors and personal distraction in the classroom.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44576,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digital Education Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digital Education Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1344/der.2020.37.32-48\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital Education Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1344/der.2020.37.32-48","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

在21世纪,在国际上,数字技术在课堂上的普及已经在数字原住民中产生了数字干扰。因此,迫切需要开发一种合适的工具来评估和测量高等教育学生的数字分心程度,以便进行持续的研究和实践。虽然之前的研究将数字分心作为多维结构的一个子组成部分和一种测试进行了处理和测量,但本研究通过仪器调查研究,在尼日利亚的职前科学、技术和数学(STM)教师中开发并验证了一个独立的数字分心量表。该仪器是通过围绕高阶建模方法采用数字分心的多维观点构建的。任职前的STM教师是从尼日利亚不同文化的大学生群体中招聘的。结果显示,尼日利亚职前STM教师的数字分心程度很高,数字分心由几个相互关联但又不同的因素组成(情绪分心、数字成瘾和拖延症分心),有证据支持更高阶的结构原型。更重要的是,经验证据证实了量表对性别的测量不变性,以及数字分心量表心理测量特性的一致性。最后,数字分心量表的重新测试可靠性表明,分数不会随着时间的推移而变化,并且该量表对学习环境的变化不敏感。最后,希望这一工具能为那些有兴趣隔离职前STM教师的教育工作者提供方便,因为他们面临着高度数字化分心的风险,这可能会导致对教师缺乏尊重和礼貌,以及课堂上的个人分心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investigating Digital Distraction among Pre-service Science, Technology, and Mathematics Teachers in Nigeria
Internationally, proliferation of digital technologies in classrooms has produced digital distractions among digital natives in this 21 st century. Thus, it is highly imperative to develop a suitable instrument for assessing and measuring digital distraction among higher education students to enable continuing research and practice. While previous studies had treated and measured digital distraction as a sub-component of a multi-dimensional construct and as a test, the present study through instrumentation survey research, developed and authenticated a standalone digital distraction scale among pre-service science, technology and mathematics (STM) teachers in Nigeria. The instrument is constructed by adopting a multidimensional standpoint of digital distraction around a higher-order modelling method. The pre-service STM teachers were recruited from a culturally varied university student population in Nigeria. The results showed a high level of digital distraction among the pre-service STM teachers in Nigeria and the digital distraction is composed of several connected yet distinctive factors (emotional distraction, digital addiction, and distraction by procrastination), with proof backing up a higher-order structural archetypal. More so, empirical evidence confirmed the measurement invariance of the scale with regards to gender and the consistency of the psychometric properties of the digital distraction scale. Finally, a test-retest reliability of the digital distraction scale showed that the scores are not variable over time and that the scale is not sensitive to alterations in the learning milieu. Finally, it is hoped that this tool will be handy for educators interested in isolating pre-service STM teachers at risk of high digital distraction which may cause lack of respect and privation of courtesy for instructors and personal distraction in the classroom.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Digital Education Review
Digital Education Review EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
18
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Digital Education Review (DER) is a scientific, open and peer review journal designed as a space for dialogue and reflection about the impact of ICT on education and new emergent forms of teaching and learning in digital environments. It is published half-yearly (June & December) and it includes articles in English or Spanish. ICT plays an important role in education, raising discussions and important new challenges. Analyze the impact of ICT, new forms of literacy and virtual teaching and learning are the main goals of Digital Education Review. The publication is open to all those investigators who wish to propose articles on this subject. Articles admitted include empirical investigations as well as reviews and theoretical reflections. The journal publishes different kinds of articles: Peer Review Articles: articles that have passed the blind review carried out by a group of experts Reviews: short articles about books, software or websides and PhD Guest and Invited Articles: articles approved by the Editorial Board of the journal. DER publishes issues related with its focus and scope and also monographic issues, centered on a specific subject. Both of them are subjected to a peer review process. Finally, this journal is published by the Digital Education Observatory (OED) and Virtual Teaching and Learning Research Group (GREAV) at the Universitat de Barcelona.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信