{"title":"不诚实领导人的崛起:原因和解决办法","authors":"E. Huppert, E. Levine","doi":"10.5465/amp.2021.0063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Honesty is a fundamental human value. Yet, the world has witnessed increasing indifference towards honesty over the past several years and stood by while dishonest leaders rose to positions of power and influence. This article provides novel theorizing to explain the rise of dishonest leaders. We theorize that intergroup conflict elicits a zero-sum mindset, leading people to focus myopically on how their ingroup can triumph over an outgroup. This focus leads people not only to engage in dishonesty, but also to judge dishonesty more positively in others, including leaders. Specifically, when dishonesty is used to defeat an outgroup, it is perceived as a signal of competence and parochial benevolence, despite being costly in the long run. As a result, people knowingly support (e.g., elect, follow) dishonest leaders. In the present article, we integrate recent findings in organizational behavior, moral psychology, political science, and sociology to build this theory. We conclude by discussing new strategies that individuals and organizations can implement to promote honesty. Ultimately, this research deepens our understanding of honesty and the forces that promote and impede its development in leaders and their followers.","PeriodicalId":48215,"journal":{"name":"Academy of Management Perspectives","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Rise of Dishonest Leaders: Causes and Solutions\",\"authors\":\"E. Huppert, E. Levine\",\"doi\":\"10.5465/amp.2021.0063\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Honesty is a fundamental human value. Yet, the world has witnessed increasing indifference towards honesty over the past several years and stood by while dishonest leaders rose to positions of power and influence. This article provides novel theorizing to explain the rise of dishonest leaders. We theorize that intergroup conflict elicits a zero-sum mindset, leading people to focus myopically on how their ingroup can triumph over an outgroup. This focus leads people not only to engage in dishonesty, but also to judge dishonesty more positively in others, including leaders. Specifically, when dishonesty is used to defeat an outgroup, it is perceived as a signal of competence and parochial benevolence, despite being costly in the long run. As a result, people knowingly support (e.g., elect, follow) dishonest leaders. In the present article, we integrate recent findings in organizational behavior, moral psychology, political science, and sociology to build this theory. We conclude by discussing new strategies that individuals and organizations can implement to promote honesty. Ultimately, this research deepens our understanding of honesty and the forces that promote and impede its development in leaders and their followers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48215,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academy of Management Perspectives\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academy of Management Perspectives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2021.0063\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academy of Management Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2021.0063","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Rise of Dishonest Leaders: Causes and Solutions
Honesty is a fundamental human value. Yet, the world has witnessed increasing indifference towards honesty over the past several years and stood by while dishonest leaders rose to positions of power and influence. This article provides novel theorizing to explain the rise of dishonest leaders. We theorize that intergroup conflict elicits a zero-sum mindset, leading people to focus myopically on how their ingroup can triumph over an outgroup. This focus leads people not only to engage in dishonesty, but also to judge dishonesty more positively in others, including leaders. Specifically, when dishonesty is used to defeat an outgroup, it is perceived as a signal of competence and parochial benevolence, despite being costly in the long run. As a result, people knowingly support (e.g., elect, follow) dishonest leaders. In the present article, we integrate recent findings in organizational behavior, moral psychology, political science, and sociology to build this theory. We conclude by discussing new strategies that individuals and organizations can implement to promote honesty. Ultimately, this research deepens our understanding of honesty and the forces that promote and impede its development in leaders and their followers.
期刊介绍:
Academy of Management Perspectives (AMP) aims to provide valuable insights to current and future thought leaders, including educators, business writers, consultants, executives, policy makers, and other professionals involved in management practice and policy. The publication seeks to bridge the gap between scholarly research and practical applications by presenting evidence-based approaches to address crucial management issues.
AMP publishes research papers that employ quantitative or qualitative evidence, either from a single study or a compilation of studies within a specific field of research. The journal does not accept opinion pieces but encourages articles that focus on the implications of findings for policy and practice rather than theoretical implications.
Examples of suitable articles for publication in AMP include practitioner or policy-oriented reviews of empirical studies, descriptive articles that contribute to our comprehension of management practices and strategic approaches, and articles highlighting the practical and policy implications of evidence-based work.