“除了金钱和健康,生活还有更重要的东西”:家庭照顾者对痴呆患者参与研究的代理决策中委托书的作用的看法

IF 2.4 3区 社会学 Q2 GERONTOLOGY
V. Shepherd, R. Griffith, K. Hood, M. Sheehan, F. Wood
{"title":"“除了金钱和健康,生活还有更重要的东西”:家庭照顾者对痴呆患者参与研究的代理决策中委托书的作用的看法","authors":"V. Shepherd, R. Griffith, K. Hood, M. Sheehan, F. Wood","doi":"10.1177/1471301219884426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"People living with dementia may experience difficulties when making decisions for themselves in the later stages of the condition. While there are mechanisms in England and Wales for appointing an attorney to make decisions about welfare and finances on their behalf, there are no provisions for appointing an attorney to make future decisions about research participation. This is despite a growing focus on Advanced Care Planning and other processes that provide opportunities to discuss future preferences and ensure that decisions are made in line with those preferences. This qualitative study with 15 family caregivers who had acted as research proxies explored the role of Power of Attorney in their decisions about research, and their views about extending current legal arrangements to include research. Five themes were identified: the holistic nature of decision-making; the ‘power’ of attorney; making decisions by putting yourself in their shoes; support for bringing research under the umbrella of attorney arrangements and a unifying theme of trusting relationships. Legal provisions for prospectively appointing a research proxy may encourage discussion about future wishes and so enable decisions about research to be made that are in accordance with the person’s preferences and wishes. However, further consultation with the public including people living with dementia and their families, and a range of stakeholders is needed. Providing guidance to families, people living with dementia and the wider research community may provide greater clarity and improve decision-making in the meantime.","PeriodicalId":51413,"journal":{"name":"Dementia-International Journal of Social Research and Practice","volume":"20 1","pages":"308 - 325"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1471301219884426","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘There’s more to life than money and health’: Family caregivers’ views on the role of Power of Attorney in proxy decisions about research participation for people living with dementia\",\"authors\":\"V. Shepherd, R. Griffith, K. Hood, M. Sheehan, F. Wood\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1471301219884426\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"People living with dementia may experience difficulties when making decisions for themselves in the later stages of the condition. While there are mechanisms in England and Wales for appointing an attorney to make decisions about welfare and finances on their behalf, there are no provisions for appointing an attorney to make future decisions about research participation. This is despite a growing focus on Advanced Care Planning and other processes that provide opportunities to discuss future preferences and ensure that decisions are made in line with those preferences. This qualitative study with 15 family caregivers who had acted as research proxies explored the role of Power of Attorney in their decisions about research, and their views about extending current legal arrangements to include research. Five themes were identified: the holistic nature of decision-making; the ‘power’ of attorney; making decisions by putting yourself in their shoes; support for bringing research under the umbrella of attorney arrangements and a unifying theme of trusting relationships. Legal provisions for prospectively appointing a research proxy may encourage discussion about future wishes and so enable decisions about research to be made that are in accordance with the person’s preferences and wishes. However, further consultation with the public including people living with dementia and their families, and a range of stakeholders is needed. Providing guidance to families, people living with dementia and the wider research community may provide greater clarity and improve decision-making in the meantime.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51413,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dementia-International Journal of Social Research and Practice\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"308 - 325\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1471301219884426\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dementia-International Journal of Social Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1471301219884426\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dementia-International Journal of Social Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1471301219884426","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

痴呆症患者在病情晚期为自己做决定时可能会遇到困难。虽然英格兰和威尔士有指定律师代表他们作出福利和财政决定的机制,但没有指定律师就未来参与研究作出决定的规定。尽管人们越来越关注高级护理计划和其他过程,这些过程提供了讨论未来偏好的机会,并确保做出符合这些偏好的决定。这项定性研究有15名家庭照顾者作为研究代理,探讨了委托书在他们关于研究的决定中的作用,以及他们对扩大现有法律安排以包括研究的看法。确定了五个主题:决策的整体性质;委托书;设身处地为别人做决定;支持将研究置于律师安排和信任关系的统一主题之下。关于预先指定研究代理人的法律规定可能会鼓励对未来愿望的讨论,从而使有关研究的决定能够根据个人的偏好和愿望做出。然而,需要与公众,包括痴呆症患者及其家人以及一系列利益攸关方进行进一步磋商。同时,为家庭、痴呆症患者和更广泛的研究界提供指导,可能会提供更清晰的信息,并改善决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
‘There’s more to life than money and health’: Family caregivers’ views on the role of Power of Attorney in proxy decisions about research participation for people living with dementia
People living with dementia may experience difficulties when making decisions for themselves in the later stages of the condition. While there are mechanisms in England and Wales for appointing an attorney to make decisions about welfare and finances on their behalf, there are no provisions for appointing an attorney to make future decisions about research participation. This is despite a growing focus on Advanced Care Planning and other processes that provide opportunities to discuss future preferences and ensure that decisions are made in line with those preferences. This qualitative study with 15 family caregivers who had acted as research proxies explored the role of Power of Attorney in their decisions about research, and their views about extending current legal arrangements to include research. Five themes were identified: the holistic nature of decision-making; the ‘power’ of attorney; making decisions by putting yourself in their shoes; support for bringing research under the umbrella of attorney arrangements and a unifying theme of trusting relationships. Legal provisions for prospectively appointing a research proxy may encourage discussion about future wishes and so enable decisions about research to be made that are in accordance with the person’s preferences and wishes. However, further consultation with the public including people living with dementia and their families, and a range of stakeholders is needed. Providing guidance to families, people living with dementia and the wider research community may provide greater clarity and improve decision-making in the meantime.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
114
期刊介绍: Dementia acts as a major forum for social research of direct relevance to improving the quality of life and quality of care for people with dementia and their families. For the first time an international research journal is available for academics and practitioners that has as its primary paradigm the lived experience of dementia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信