重新规划领土:对澳大利亚五个州小学生识字干预规定的分析

IF 0.9 Q3 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Joanne Quick
{"title":"重新规划领土:对澳大利亚五个州小学生识字干预规定的分析","authors":"Joanne Quick","doi":"10.1080/19404158.2020.1796726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Literacy interventions are a common educational response for supporting students with literacy difficulties. Australian schools historically offered such programs,, though recent studies were not found in the research literature. This paper reports on school-level and literacy intervention data for a randomly selected sample of 366 schools, from across Australia’s five more populous states. Interventions were offered by 52% of schools in the sample. Programs offered were grouped by theoretical emphasis for analysis. Constructivist interventions were most frequently offered, followed by cognitive, and other, programs. Statistically significant differences in the frequency and types of interventions offered were identified between states and sectors. An increase in cognitively oriented interventions and programs for small groups of students was identified. These findings are discussed in relation to policy documents and research literature. Recommendations are made for research into schools’ intervention choices, the longitudinal impact of particular programs, and provision for students with more complex literacy difficulties.","PeriodicalId":44419,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties","volume":"25 1","pages":"183 - 213"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19404158.2020.1796726","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Re-mapping the territory: an analysis of literacy intervention provision for primary students in five Australian states\",\"authors\":\"Joanne Quick\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19404158.2020.1796726\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Literacy interventions are a common educational response for supporting students with literacy difficulties. Australian schools historically offered such programs,, though recent studies were not found in the research literature. This paper reports on school-level and literacy intervention data for a randomly selected sample of 366 schools, from across Australia’s five more populous states. Interventions were offered by 52% of schools in the sample. Programs offered were grouped by theoretical emphasis for analysis. Constructivist interventions were most frequently offered, followed by cognitive, and other, programs. Statistically significant differences in the frequency and types of interventions offered were identified between states and sectors. An increase in cognitively oriented interventions and programs for small groups of students was identified. These findings are discussed in relation to policy documents and research literature. Recommendations are made for research into schools’ intervention choices, the longitudinal impact of particular programs, and provision for students with more complex literacy difficulties.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44419,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"183 - 213\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19404158.2020.1796726\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19404158.2020.1796726\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19404158.2020.1796726","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要扫盲干预措施是一种常见的教育对策,用于支持有识字困难的学生。澳大利亚学校历来提供此类课程,尽管最近的研究没有在研究文献中找到。本文报告了从澳大利亚人口最多的五个州随机选择的366所学校的学校水平和识字干预数据。样本中52%的学校提供了干预措施。所提供的程序按理论重点分组进行分析。最常见的是建构主义干预,其次是认知和其他项目。在统计上,各州和各部门在提供干预的频率和类型方面存在显著差异。针对小群体学生的认知导向干预和项目有所增加。这些发现与政策文件和研究文献有关。建议研究学校的干预选择、特定项目的纵向影响,以及为有更复杂识字困难的学生提供服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Re-mapping the territory: an analysis of literacy intervention provision for primary students in five Australian states
ABSTRACT Literacy interventions are a common educational response for supporting students with literacy difficulties. Australian schools historically offered such programs,, though recent studies were not found in the research literature. This paper reports on school-level and literacy intervention data for a randomly selected sample of 366 schools, from across Australia’s five more populous states. Interventions were offered by 52% of schools in the sample. Programs offered were grouped by theoretical emphasis for analysis. Constructivist interventions were most frequently offered, followed by cognitive, and other, programs. Statistically significant differences in the frequency and types of interventions offered were identified between states and sectors. An increase in cognitively oriented interventions and programs for small groups of students was identified. These findings are discussed in relation to policy documents and research literature. Recommendations are made for research into schools’ intervention choices, the longitudinal impact of particular programs, and provision for students with more complex literacy difficulties.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
8
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信