SARS-CoV-2快速抗原检测与RT-PCR Cq值的关系

IF 1.1 Q4 VIROLOGY
Advances in Virology Pub Date : 2022-05-10 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2022/9245248
Dipendra Kumar Mandal, Bibek Raj Bhattarai, Sushant Pokhrel, Mandira Chhusyabaga, Parmananda Bhandari, Mahendra Prasad Bhatt, Sujan Babu Marhattha
{"title":"SARS-CoV-2快速抗原检测与RT-PCR Cq值的关系","authors":"Dipendra Kumar Mandal, Bibek Raj Bhattarai, Sushant Pokhrel, Mandira Chhusyabaga, Parmananda Bhandari, Mahendra Prasad Bhatt, Sujan Babu Marhattha","doi":"10.1155/2022/9245248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early detection of the SARS-CoV-2 is crucial for both the improvement of turnaround time and limiting the spread of the virus in the community. Thus, this study aims to establish rapid antigen tests as an effective diagnostic tool to improve the testing strategies of COVID-19 diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A laboratory based cross-sectional study was performed on the patients that visited Sukraraj Tropical and Infectious Disease Hospital (STIDH) in Kathmandu, Nepal, from November 2020 to January 2021. A total of 213 nasopharyngeal swabs were collected from both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients for rapid antigen test, followed by RT-PCR assay as reference test for confirmation of COVID-19. A standard questionnaire was administered to collect other information from patients. Data were collected and analyzed using SPSS version 20.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 213 individuals, 75 tested positive in Ag-RDT test, while 118 tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA genome via Real time PCR assay. The overall diagnostic performance of Ag-RDT showed 63.6% sensitivity and 97.9% specificity. The diagnostic accuracy of Ag- RDT was 78.9% with <i>κ</i> value 0.590, showing moderate agreement with RT-PCR. Significant difference (<i>p</i> value <0.001) was observed between Ag- RDT<sup>+</sup> and Ag- RDT<sup>-</sup> results when compared to C<sub>q</sub> values obtained from RT- PCR.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The promising performance of Ag-RDT renders it useful as screening tool alongside RT-PCR to reduce transmission via improving contact tracing, implementation of local mitigation strategies, and refining existing testing protocol for diagnosis of COVID-19.</p>","PeriodicalId":7473,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Virology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9113911/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic Performance of SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test in relation to RT-PCR C<sub>q</sub> Value.\",\"authors\":\"Dipendra Kumar Mandal, Bibek Raj Bhattarai, Sushant Pokhrel, Mandira Chhusyabaga, Parmananda Bhandari, Mahendra Prasad Bhatt, Sujan Babu Marhattha\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2022/9245248\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early detection of the SARS-CoV-2 is crucial for both the improvement of turnaround time and limiting the spread of the virus in the community. Thus, this study aims to establish rapid antigen tests as an effective diagnostic tool to improve the testing strategies of COVID-19 diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A laboratory based cross-sectional study was performed on the patients that visited Sukraraj Tropical and Infectious Disease Hospital (STIDH) in Kathmandu, Nepal, from November 2020 to January 2021. A total of 213 nasopharyngeal swabs were collected from both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients for rapid antigen test, followed by RT-PCR assay as reference test for confirmation of COVID-19. A standard questionnaire was administered to collect other information from patients. Data were collected and analyzed using SPSS version 20.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 213 individuals, 75 tested positive in Ag-RDT test, while 118 tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA genome via Real time PCR assay. The overall diagnostic performance of Ag-RDT showed 63.6% sensitivity and 97.9% specificity. The diagnostic accuracy of Ag- RDT was 78.9% with <i>κ</i> value 0.590, showing moderate agreement with RT-PCR. Significant difference (<i>p</i> value <0.001) was observed between Ag- RDT<sup>+</sup> and Ag- RDT<sup>-</sup> results when compared to C<sub>q</sub> values obtained from RT- PCR.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The promising performance of Ag-RDT renders it useful as screening tool alongside RT-PCR to reduce transmission via improving contact tracing, implementation of local mitigation strategies, and refining existing testing protocol for diagnosis of COVID-19.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7473,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Virology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9113911/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Virology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9245248\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"VIROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Virology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9245248","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"VIROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景早期检测严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型对于缩短周转时间和限制病毒在社区中的传播至关重要。因此,本研究旨在建立快速抗原检测作为一种有效的诊断工具,以改进新冠肺炎诊断的检测策略。方法对2020年11月至2021年1月在尼泊尔加德满都Sukraraj热带传染病医院(STIDH)就诊的患者进行实验室横断面研究。共从有症状和无症状患者中采集213份鼻咽拭子进行快速抗原检测,然后进行RT-PCR检测作为新冠肺炎确诊的参考检测。使用标准问卷收集患者的其他信息。数据收集并使用SPSS版本20进行分析。结果213人中,75人Ag-RDT检测呈阳性,118人通过实时PCR检测呈严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型RNA基因组阳性。Ag-RDT的总体诊断性能显示出63.6%的敏感性和97.9%的特异性。Ag-RDT的诊断准确率为78.9%,κ值为0.590,与RT-PCR的诊断结果基本一致。与RT-PCR获得的Cq值相比,Ag-RDT+和Ag-RDT-结果之间存在显著差异(p值<0.001)。结论Ag-RDT具有良好的性能,可作为RT-PCR的筛查工具,通过改进接触者追踪、实施当地缓解策略和完善现有的新冠肺炎诊断检测方案来减少传播。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diagnostic Performance of SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test in relation to RT-PCR Cq Value.

Background: Early detection of the SARS-CoV-2 is crucial for both the improvement of turnaround time and limiting the spread of the virus in the community. Thus, this study aims to establish rapid antigen tests as an effective diagnostic tool to improve the testing strategies of COVID-19 diagnosis.

Methods: A laboratory based cross-sectional study was performed on the patients that visited Sukraraj Tropical and Infectious Disease Hospital (STIDH) in Kathmandu, Nepal, from November 2020 to January 2021. A total of 213 nasopharyngeal swabs were collected from both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients for rapid antigen test, followed by RT-PCR assay as reference test for confirmation of COVID-19. A standard questionnaire was administered to collect other information from patients. Data were collected and analyzed using SPSS version 20.

Results: Out of 213 individuals, 75 tested positive in Ag-RDT test, while 118 tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA genome via Real time PCR assay. The overall diagnostic performance of Ag-RDT showed 63.6% sensitivity and 97.9% specificity. The diagnostic accuracy of Ag- RDT was 78.9% with κ value 0.590, showing moderate agreement with RT-PCR. Significant difference (p value <0.001) was observed between Ag- RDT+ and Ag- RDT- results when compared to Cq values obtained from RT- PCR.

Conclusion: The promising performance of Ag-RDT renders it useful as screening tool alongside RT-PCR to reduce transmission via improving contact tracing, implementation of local mitigation strategies, and refining existing testing protocol for diagnosis of COVID-19.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信