{"title":"导航AACSB国际标准3:有效管理教师充分性和资格比率的策略","authors":"Brett J. L. Landry, R. Scherer","doi":"10.1080/08832323.2023.2240475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The AACSB 2020 business standards update provides a “principle-based” approach to the continuous improvement process for a business school. This approach provides great flexibility for business schools to define faculty sufficiency and maintenance of faculty qualifications in a way that is congruent with their mission and expectations for faculty performance. In the following discussion, we dispel the folklore associated with faculty sufficiency and qualifications (Standard 3). Moreover, we provide a step-by-step process to guide business school administrators in maximizing guideline ratios related to the standard. Finally, examples are provided to illustrate specific strategies for navigating the standard.","PeriodicalId":47318,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education for Business","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Navigating AACSB International Standard 3: Strategies to effectively manage faculty sufficiency and qualifications ratios\",\"authors\":\"Brett J. L. Landry, R. Scherer\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08832323.2023.2240475\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The AACSB 2020 business standards update provides a “principle-based” approach to the continuous improvement process for a business school. This approach provides great flexibility for business schools to define faculty sufficiency and maintenance of faculty qualifications in a way that is congruent with their mission and expectations for faculty performance. In the following discussion, we dispel the folklore associated with faculty sufficiency and qualifications (Standard 3). Moreover, we provide a step-by-step process to guide business school administrators in maximizing guideline ratios related to the standard. Finally, examples are provided to illustrate specific strategies for navigating the standard.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47318,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Education for Business\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Education for Business\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2023.2240475\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education for Business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2023.2240475","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Navigating AACSB International Standard 3: Strategies to effectively manage faculty sufficiency and qualifications ratios
Abstract The AACSB 2020 business standards update provides a “principle-based” approach to the continuous improvement process for a business school. This approach provides great flexibility for business schools to define faculty sufficiency and maintenance of faculty qualifications in a way that is congruent with their mission and expectations for faculty performance. In the following discussion, we dispel the folklore associated with faculty sufficiency and qualifications (Standard 3). Moreover, we provide a step-by-step process to guide business school administrators in maximizing guideline ratios related to the standard. Finally, examples are provided to illustrate specific strategies for navigating the standard.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Education for Business is for those educating tomorrow''s businesspeople. The journal primarily features basic and applied research-based articles in entrepreneurship, accounting, communications, economics, finance, information systems, management, marketing, and other business disciplines. Along with the focus on reporting research within traditional business subjects, an additional expanded area of interest is publishing articles within the discipline of entrepreneurship. Articles report successful innovations in teaching and curriculum development at the college and postgraduate levels. Authors address changes in today''s business world and in the business professions that are fundamentally influencing the competencies that business graduates need. JEB also offers a forum for new theories and for analyses of controversial issues. Articles in the Journal fall into the following categories: Original and Applied Research; Editorial/Professional Perspectives; and Innovative Instructional Classroom Projects/Best Practices. Articles are selected on a blind peer-reviewed basis. Original and Applied Research - Articles published feature the results of formal research where findings have universal impact. Editorial/Professional Perspective - Articles published feature the viewpoint of primarily the author regarding important issues affecting education for business. Innovative Instructional Classroom Projects/Best Practices - Articles published feature the results of instructional experiments basically derived from a classroom project conducted at one institution by one or several faculty.