基于dna的野生动物法医学分类鉴定的研究现状、发展方向及思考

Kelly A. Meiklejohn , Mary K. Burnham-Curtis , Dyan J. Straughan , Jenny Giles , M. Katherine Moore
{"title":"基于dna的野生动物法医学分类鉴定的研究现状、发展方向及思考","authors":"Kelly A. Meiklejohn ,&nbsp;Mary K. Burnham-Curtis ,&nbsp;Dyan J. Straughan ,&nbsp;Jenny Giles ,&nbsp;M. Katherine Moore","doi":"10.1016/j.fsiae.2021.100030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Wildlife forensic analyses are frequently concerned with taxonomic identification, and very often employ amplification and Sanger sequencing of informative regions of the genome to achieve this. The materials submitted to wildlife forensic laboratories for taxonomic identification span a wide scope, from plant and animal parts in trade to assemblages of incidental biota at crime scenes. As these analyses take place within the context of legal proceedings, the wildlife forensic community is subject to unique requirements and considerations. These requirements and considerations are quite different from those of human forensic DNA, and have driven standardization in this field. While there has been extensive debate over appropriate DNA-based methods for taxonomic identification of a wide variety of biota in research settings, there has been little discussion on the issues associated with this approach in the high scrutiny environment of forensic science. This review outlines: key procedural and biological factors that may impact the accuracy of interpretation and reporting taxonomic identifications; resulting conventions employed by the wildlife forensics community; and implications for the use of emergent DNA sequencing technologies in taxonomic identification of wildlife in casework.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":93435,"journal":{"name":"Forensic science international. Animals and environments","volume":"1 ","pages":"Article 100030"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666937421000299/pdfft?md5=2862fbc5c013379ab52262b9cc29825b&pid=1-s2.0-S2666937421000299-main.pdf","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Current methods, future directions and considerations of DNA-based taxonomic identification in wildlife forensics\",\"authors\":\"Kelly A. Meiklejohn ,&nbsp;Mary K. Burnham-Curtis ,&nbsp;Dyan J. Straughan ,&nbsp;Jenny Giles ,&nbsp;M. Katherine Moore\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fsiae.2021.100030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Wildlife forensic analyses are frequently concerned with taxonomic identification, and very often employ amplification and Sanger sequencing of informative regions of the genome to achieve this. The materials submitted to wildlife forensic laboratories for taxonomic identification span a wide scope, from plant and animal parts in trade to assemblages of incidental biota at crime scenes. As these analyses take place within the context of legal proceedings, the wildlife forensic community is subject to unique requirements and considerations. These requirements and considerations are quite different from those of human forensic DNA, and have driven standardization in this field. While there has been extensive debate over appropriate DNA-based methods for taxonomic identification of a wide variety of biota in research settings, there has been little discussion on the issues associated with this approach in the high scrutiny environment of forensic science. This review outlines: key procedural and biological factors that may impact the accuracy of interpretation and reporting taxonomic identifications; resulting conventions employed by the wildlife forensics community; and implications for the use of emergent DNA sequencing technologies in taxonomic identification of wildlife in casework.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93435,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forensic science international. Animals and environments\",\"volume\":\"1 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100030\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666937421000299/pdfft?md5=2862fbc5c013379ab52262b9cc29825b&pid=1-s2.0-S2666937421000299-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forensic science international. Animals and environments\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666937421000299\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic science international. Animals and environments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666937421000299","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

野生动物法医分析经常涉及分类鉴定,并且经常使用基因组信息区域的扩增和桑格测序来实现这一目标。提交给野生动物法医实验室进行分类鉴定的材料范围很广,从贸易中的动植物部位到犯罪现场偶然发现的生物群组合。由于这些分析是在法律程序的背景下进行的,野生动物法医社区受到独特的要求和考虑。这些要求和考虑与人类法医DNA的要求和考虑有很大不同,并推动了这一领域的标准化。虽然在研究环境中对各种生物区系进行分类鉴定的适当的基于dna的方法存在广泛的争论,但在法医科学的高度审查环境中,关于这种方法的相关问题的讨论很少。本文概述了可能影响解释和报告分类鉴定准确性的关键程序和生物学因素;由此产生的野生动物法医学界采用的公约;及其在野生动物分类鉴定中应用新兴DNA测序技术的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Current methods, future directions and considerations of DNA-based taxonomic identification in wildlife forensics

Wildlife forensic analyses are frequently concerned with taxonomic identification, and very often employ amplification and Sanger sequencing of informative regions of the genome to achieve this. The materials submitted to wildlife forensic laboratories for taxonomic identification span a wide scope, from plant and animal parts in trade to assemblages of incidental biota at crime scenes. As these analyses take place within the context of legal proceedings, the wildlife forensic community is subject to unique requirements and considerations. These requirements and considerations are quite different from those of human forensic DNA, and have driven standardization in this field. While there has been extensive debate over appropriate DNA-based methods for taxonomic identification of a wide variety of biota in research settings, there has been little discussion on the issues associated with this approach in the high scrutiny environment of forensic science. This review outlines: key procedural and biological factors that may impact the accuracy of interpretation and reporting taxonomic identifications; resulting conventions employed by the wildlife forensics community; and implications for the use of emergent DNA sequencing technologies in taxonomic identification of wildlife in casework.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Forensic science international. Animals and environments
Forensic science international. Animals and environments Pollution, Law, Forensic Medicine, Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine (General)
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
142 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信