加纳两个城市妇女的避孕方法偏好

S. Rominski
{"title":"加纳两个城市妇女的避孕方法偏好","authors":"S. Rominski","doi":"10.19080/GJORM.2018.06.555677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: While availability of women’s preferred methods is an important indicator of quality of family planning services, the preferences Ghanaian women hold around contraceptive methods are largely unknown. Methods: We conducted a facility-based survey in five family planning clinics in Ghana’s two largest cities. Women were interviewed before and after their family planning counseling session. In the pre-visit interview, women were asked both the method they most preferred, as well as method characteristics which appealed to them. In the post-visit interview, they were asked which method they were leaving with, if they received the method they most preferred, and how satisfied they were to be leaving with their method. A series of bivariate logistic regressions were performed to assess factors associated with certain method preference and adoption. Results: A total of 337 women were interviewed and able to be linked pre- and post-visit. Most of the participants (54.1%, n=482) stated a preference for a long acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) method (either an implant (40.7%, n=137) or an IUD (13.4%, n=45)), while a sizable minority of the participants stated a preference for an injectable (32.3%, n=109). Only 5% (n=17) participants said they did not know which method they preferred. In bivariate logistic regression analysis, older and married women and those with higher education were more likely to want the IUD, while unmarried and younger women preferred the injection. Women who wanted a method that would protect them for multiple years showed preference for the IUD and the implant, while women who wanted pregnancy protection for a few months and those who did not want a method which requires a visit to the clinic to stop using preferred the injection. Conclusion: Our study participants were most likely to want, and receive, a LARC method, mainly the implant. These participants have strong preferences, which are generally being met. Further work should investigate whether women who receive their preferred method are more likely to continue using the method than those who do not.","PeriodicalId":92369,"journal":{"name":"Global journal of reproductive medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contraception Method Preferences Among Women in Two Ghanaian Cities\",\"authors\":\"S. Rominski\",\"doi\":\"10.19080/GJORM.2018.06.555677\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: While availability of women’s preferred methods is an important indicator of quality of family planning services, the preferences Ghanaian women hold around contraceptive methods are largely unknown. Methods: We conducted a facility-based survey in five family planning clinics in Ghana’s two largest cities. Women were interviewed before and after their family planning counseling session. In the pre-visit interview, women were asked both the method they most preferred, as well as method characteristics which appealed to them. In the post-visit interview, they were asked which method they were leaving with, if they received the method they most preferred, and how satisfied they were to be leaving with their method. A series of bivariate logistic regressions were performed to assess factors associated with certain method preference and adoption. Results: A total of 337 women were interviewed and able to be linked pre- and post-visit. Most of the participants (54.1%, n=482) stated a preference for a long acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) method (either an implant (40.7%, n=137) or an IUD (13.4%, n=45)), while a sizable minority of the participants stated a preference for an injectable (32.3%, n=109). Only 5% (n=17) participants said they did not know which method they preferred. In bivariate logistic regression analysis, older and married women and those with higher education were more likely to want the IUD, while unmarried and younger women preferred the injection. Women who wanted a method that would protect them for multiple years showed preference for the IUD and the implant, while women who wanted pregnancy protection for a few months and those who did not want a method which requires a visit to the clinic to stop using preferred the injection. Conclusion: Our study participants were most likely to want, and receive, a LARC method, mainly the implant. These participants have strong preferences, which are generally being met. Further work should investigate whether women who receive their preferred method are more likely to continue using the method than those who do not.\",\"PeriodicalId\":92369,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global journal of reproductive medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global journal of reproductive medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19080/GJORM.2018.06.555677\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global journal of reproductive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19080/GJORM.2018.06.555677","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

背景:虽然妇女首选避孕方法的可用性是衡量计划生育服务质量的一个重要指标,但加纳妇女对避孕方法的偏好在很大程度上是未知的。方法:我们在加纳两个最大城市的五家计划生育诊所进行了一项基于设施的调查。妇女在计划生育咨询会议前后接受了访谈。在访视前的访谈中,女性被问及她们最喜欢的方法,以及吸引她们的方法特征。在访问后的采访中,他们被问到要用哪种方法离开,是否收到了他们最喜欢的方法,以及他们对自己的方法有多满意。进行了一系列双变量逻辑回归,以评估与某些方法偏好和采用相关的因素。结果:共有337名女性接受了访谈,并能够在访问前后进行联系。大多数参与者(54.1%,n=482)表示更喜欢长效可逆避孕(LARC)方法(植入物(40.7%,n=137)或宫内节育器(13.4%,n=45)),而相当一部分参与者表示更喜欢注射(32.3%,n=109)。只有5%(n=17)的参与者表示他们不知道自己喜欢哪种方法。在双变量逻辑回归分析中,年长和已婚女性以及受过高等教育的女性更有可能想要宫内节育器,而未婚和年轻女性更喜欢注射。想要保护自己多年的方法的女性更喜欢宫内节育器和植入物,而想要保护怀孕几个月的女性和不想要需要去诊所才能停止使用的方法的妇女更喜欢注射。结论:我们的研究参与者最有可能想要并接受LARC方法,主要是植入物。这些参与者有强烈的偏好,这些偏好通常都会得到满足。进一步的工作应该调查接受自己喜欢的方法的女性是否比不接受的女性更有可能继续使用这种方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Contraception Method Preferences Among Women in Two Ghanaian Cities
Background: While availability of women’s preferred methods is an important indicator of quality of family planning services, the preferences Ghanaian women hold around contraceptive methods are largely unknown. Methods: We conducted a facility-based survey in five family planning clinics in Ghana’s two largest cities. Women were interviewed before and after their family planning counseling session. In the pre-visit interview, women were asked both the method they most preferred, as well as method characteristics which appealed to them. In the post-visit interview, they were asked which method they were leaving with, if they received the method they most preferred, and how satisfied they were to be leaving with their method. A series of bivariate logistic regressions were performed to assess factors associated with certain method preference and adoption. Results: A total of 337 women were interviewed and able to be linked pre- and post-visit. Most of the participants (54.1%, n=482) stated a preference for a long acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) method (either an implant (40.7%, n=137) or an IUD (13.4%, n=45)), while a sizable minority of the participants stated a preference for an injectable (32.3%, n=109). Only 5% (n=17) participants said they did not know which method they preferred. In bivariate logistic regression analysis, older and married women and those with higher education were more likely to want the IUD, while unmarried and younger women preferred the injection. Women who wanted a method that would protect them for multiple years showed preference for the IUD and the implant, while women who wanted pregnancy protection for a few months and those who did not want a method which requires a visit to the clinic to stop using preferred the injection. Conclusion: Our study participants were most likely to want, and receive, a LARC method, mainly the implant. These participants have strong preferences, which are generally being met. Further work should investigate whether women who receive their preferred method are more likely to continue using the method than those who do not.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信