Mai Iwanaga, Sosei Yamaguchi, Sayaka Sato, Kiyoaki Nakanishi, Erisa Nishiuchi, Michiyo Shimodaira, Yugan So, Kaori Usui, Chiyo Fujii
{"title":"日本未经治疗的心理健康问题患者社区心理健康外展服务强度的回顾性队列研究","authors":"Mai Iwanaga, Sosei Yamaguchi, Sayaka Sato, Kiyoaki Nakanishi, Erisa Nishiuchi, Michiyo Shimodaira, Yugan So, Kaori Usui, Chiyo Fujii","doi":"10.1002/pcn5.138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to clarify the association between treatment status (untreated or treated) at the start of community mental health outreach services and service intensity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study was conducted using the Tokorozawa City mental health outreach service users' data. Treatment status at the start of service (exposure variable) and the service intensity (outcome variables) were taken from clinical records. Poisson regression and linear regression analyses were conducted. The frequency of medical or social service use 12 months after service initiation was also calculated. This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee at the National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry (No. A2020-081).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 89 people, 37 (42%) were untreated. Family members in the untreated group were more likely to be targets or recipients of services than in the treated group (<i>b</i> = 0.707, <i>p</i> < 0.001, Bonferroni-adjusted <i>p</i> < 0.001). Compared to the treated group, the untreated group received fewer services themselves (<i>b</i> = -0.290, <i>p</i> = 0.005), and also fewer services by telephone (<i>b</i> = -0.252, <i>p</i> = 0.012); by contrast, they received more services at the health center (<i>b</i> = 0.478, <i>p</i> = 0.031) and for family support (<i>b</i> = 0.720, <i>p</i> = 0.024), but these significant differences disappeared after Bonferroni adjustment. At least 11% of people in the untreated group were hospitalized and 35% were outpatients 12 months after service initiation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Family involvement may be a key service component for untreated people. The service intensity with and without treatment may vary by service location.</p>","PeriodicalId":74405,"journal":{"name":"PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences","volume":" ","pages":"e138"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11114434/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Service intensity of community mental health outreach among people with untreated mental health problems in Japan: A retrospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Mai Iwanaga, Sosei Yamaguchi, Sayaka Sato, Kiyoaki Nakanishi, Erisa Nishiuchi, Michiyo Shimodaira, Yugan So, Kaori Usui, Chiyo Fujii\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pcn5.138\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to clarify the association between treatment status (untreated or treated) at the start of community mental health outreach services and service intensity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study was conducted using the Tokorozawa City mental health outreach service users' data. Treatment status at the start of service (exposure variable) and the service intensity (outcome variables) were taken from clinical records. Poisson regression and linear regression analyses were conducted. The frequency of medical or social service use 12 months after service initiation was also calculated. This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee at the National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry (No. A2020-081).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 89 people, 37 (42%) were untreated. Family members in the untreated group were more likely to be targets or recipients of services than in the treated group (<i>b</i> = 0.707, <i>p</i> < 0.001, Bonferroni-adjusted <i>p</i> < 0.001). Compared to the treated group, the untreated group received fewer services themselves (<i>b</i> = -0.290, <i>p</i> = 0.005), and also fewer services by telephone (<i>b</i> = -0.252, <i>p</i> = 0.012); by contrast, they received more services at the health center (<i>b</i> = 0.478, <i>p</i> = 0.031) and for family support (<i>b</i> = 0.720, <i>p</i> = 0.024), but these significant differences disappeared after Bonferroni adjustment. At least 11% of people in the untreated group were hospitalized and 35% were outpatients 12 months after service initiation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Family involvement may be a key service component for untreated people. The service intensity with and without treatment may vary by service location.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74405,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e138\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11114434/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pcn5.138\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pcn5.138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究旨在厘清社区心理健康外展服务开始时的治疗状况(未治疗或治疗)与服务强度之间的关系。本研究采用北小泽市心理健康外展服务使用者资料进行回顾性队列研究。服务开始时的治疗状态(暴露变量)和服务强度(结果变量)取自临床记录。进行泊松回归和线性回归分析。还计算了服务开始12个月后使用医疗或社会服务的频率。本研究已获国家神经病学和精神病学中心研究伦理委员会批准(编号:No。A2020 081)。89例患者中,37例(42%)未接受治疗。与治疗组相比,未治疗组的家庭成员更有可能成为服务的目标或接受者(b = 0.707, p < 0.001,经Bonferroni调整的p < 0.001)。与治疗组相比,未治疗组接受的服务较少(b = - 0.290, p = 0.005),电话服务较少(b = - 0.252, p = 0.012);相比之下,他们在卫生中心获得的服务(b = 0.478, p = 0.031)和家庭支持(b = 0.720, p = 0.024)更多,但经Bonferroni调整后,这些显著差异消失。在服务开始12个月后,未治疗组中至少有11%的人住院,35%的人门诊。家庭参与可能是为未接受治疗的人提供服务的关键组成部分。使用和不使用处理的使用强度可能因使用地点而异。
Service intensity of community mental health outreach among people with untreated mental health problems in Japan: A retrospective cohort study.
Aim: This study aimed to clarify the association between treatment status (untreated or treated) at the start of community mental health outreach services and service intensity.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted using the Tokorozawa City mental health outreach service users' data. Treatment status at the start of service (exposure variable) and the service intensity (outcome variables) were taken from clinical records. Poisson regression and linear regression analyses were conducted. The frequency of medical or social service use 12 months after service initiation was also calculated. This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee at the National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry (No. A2020-081).
Results: Of 89 people, 37 (42%) were untreated. Family members in the untreated group were more likely to be targets or recipients of services than in the treated group (b = 0.707, p < 0.001, Bonferroni-adjusted p < 0.001). Compared to the treated group, the untreated group received fewer services themselves (b = -0.290, p = 0.005), and also fewer services by telephone (b = -0.252, p = 0.012); by contrast, they received more services at the health center (b = 0.478, p = 0.031) and for family support (b = 0.720, p = 0.024), but these significant differences disappeared after Bonferroni adjustment. At least 11% of people in the untreated group were hospitalized and 35% were outpatients 12 months after service initiation.
Conclusion: Family involvement may be a key service component for untreated people. The service intensity with and without treatment may vary by service location.