计算西班牙语学校儿童阅读困难患病率的程序差异/计算西班牙语学校儿童阅读障碍患病率的程序差异

IF 0.8 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Ariel Cuadro, Alexa von Hagen, Daniel Costa Ball
{"title":"计算西班牙语学校儿童阅读困难患病率的程序差异/计算西班牙语学校儿童阅读障碍患病率的程序差异","authors":"Ariel Cuadro, Alexa von Hagen, Daniel Costa Ball","doi":"10.1080/02109395.2016.1268388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The prevalence of reading difficulties (RD) reflects controversial data ranging from 3.1–3.2% to 17.5%. Possible explanations are partly based on the incidence of orthography-specific factors influencing the reading process, but also on methodological differences that hinder comparison of the reported results. For this reason, the present study aims to analyse the prevalence of RD in a sample of 1,408 Spanish-speaking school children by comparing different ways of calculating the prevalence rate. The results reflect a prevalence of 2.2−5.3%, consistent with data reported for predominantly transparent orthographies. Some of the procedures used to identify RD are more accurate in early school years than at more advanced moments of schooling. Furthermore, the consideration of students’ sex when calculating the prevalence of RD seems to represent a more sensitive way of identifying students with RD.","PeriodicalId":55642,"journal":{"name":"Estudios De Psicologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02109395.2016.1268388","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Procedural differences in the calculation of the prevalence of reading difficulties in Spanish-speaking school children / Diferencias procedimentales en el cálculo de la prevalencia del retraso lector en escolares hispanoparlantes\",\"authors\":\"Ariel Cuadro, Alexa von Hagen, Daniel Costa Ball\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02109395.2016.1268388\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The prevalence of reading difficulties (RD) reflects controversial data ranging from 3.1–3.2% to 17.5%. Possible explanations are partly based on the incidence of orthography-specific factors influencing the reading process, but also on methodological differences that hinder comparison of the reported results. For this reason, the present study aims to analyse the prevalence of RD in a sample of 1,408 Spanish-speaking school children by comparing different ways of calculating the prevalence rate. The results reflect a prevalence of 2.2−5.3%, consistent with data reported for predominantly transparent orthographies. Some of the procedures used to identify RD are more accurate in early school years than at more advanced moments of schooling. Furthermore, the consideration of students’ sex when calculating the prevalence of RD seems to represent a more sensitive way of identifying students with RD.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55642,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Estudios De Psicologia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02109395.2016.1268388\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Estudios De Psicologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02109395.2016.1268388\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Estudios De Psicologia","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02109395.2016.1268388","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

摘要阅读困难(RD)的患病率反映了3.1%至3.2%至17.5%的有争议的数据。可能的解释部分基于影响阅读过程的拼写特定因素的发生率,但也基于阻碍报告结果比较的方法差异。因此,本研究旨在通过比较不同的患病率计算方法,分析1408名西班牙语学校儿童的RD患病率。结果反映出2.2-5.3%的患病率,与主要透明正字法的数据一致。一些用于识别RD的程序在早期比在学校教育的高级阶段更准确。此外,在计算RD患病率时考虑学生的性别似乎是识别RD学生的一种更敏感的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Procedural differences in the calculation of the prevalence of reading difficulties in Spanish-speaking school children / Diferencias procedimentales en el cálculo de la prevalencia del retraso lector en escolares hispanoparlantes
Abstract The prevalence of reading difficulties (RD) reflects controversial data ranging from 3.1–3.2% to 17.5%. Possible explanations are partly based on the incidence of orthography-specific factors influencing the reading process, but also on methodological differences that hinder comparison of the reported results. For this reason, the present study aims to analyse the prevalence of RD in a sample of 1,408 Spanish-speaking school children by comparing different ways of calculating the prevalence rate. The results reflect a prevalence of 2.2−5.3%, consistent with data reported for predominantly transparent orthographies. Some of the procedures used to identify RD are more accurate in early school years than at more advanced moments of schooling. Furthermore, the consideration of students’ sex when calculating the prevalence of RD seems to represent a more sensitive way of identifying students with RD.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Estudios De Psicologia
Estudios De Psicologia PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信