北京师范大学五年级数学主题九题分析

Eni Siskowati, S. Ramadhan
{"title":"北京师范大学五年级数学主题九题分析","authors":"Eni Siskowati, S. Ramadhan","doi":"10.33578/pjr.v7i2.9210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to evaluate learning through test techniques, which are conducted on 5th grade elementary school students, Mathematics subject. This research is a type of quantitative descriptive research using the ex post facto method. The instrument used in this study was in the form of math subject matter questions consisting of 20 items collected through a written test technique on students. The data obtained were analyzed using the Rasch Model assisted by the Winstep program through an empirical validity process including validity, reliability and difficulty level tests. The results showed that in the validity test, items were invalid, in the reliability test there were 2 types, namely Person Reliability which was categorized as very good, while Item Reliability was categorized as weak. Whereas on the results of the difficulty level of the questions, the category is very difficult. The implication of this research is that this research can be used as a reference for other researchers in conducting research on the preparation and analysis of item items. At the time of designing the questions, it is hoped that a review will be carried out regarding the material that will be discussed in the test.","PeriodicalId":17723,"journal":{"name":"JURNAL PAJAR (Pendidikan dan Pengajaran)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ANALYSIS OF THEME 9 MATHEMATICS 5 TH GRADE MATHEMATICS QUESTIONS AT SDIT RAUDHATURRAHMAH PEKANBARU\",\"authors\":\"Eni Siskowati, S. Ramadhan\",\"doi\":\"10.33578/pjr.v7i2.9210\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to evaluate learning through test techniques, which are conducted on 5th grade elementary school students, Mathematics subject. This research is a type of quantitative descriptive research using the ex post facto method. The instrument used in this study was in the form of math subject matter questions consisting of 20 items collected through a written test technique on students. The data obtained were analyzed using the Rasch Model assisted by the Winstep program through an empirical validity process including validity, reliability and difficulty level tests. The results showed that in the validity test, items were invalid, in the reliability test there were 2 types, namely Person Reliability which was categorized as very good, while Item Reliability was categorized as weak. Whereas on the results of the difficulty level of the questions, the category is very difficult. The implication of this research is that this research can be used as a reference for other researchers in conducting research on the preparation and analysis of item items. At the time of designing the questions, it is hoped that a review will be carried out regarding the material that will be discussed in the test.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17723,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JURNAL PAJAR (Pendidikan dan Pengajaran)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JURNAL PAJAR (Pendidikan dan Pengajaran)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33578/pjr.v7i2.9210\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JURNAL PAJAR (Pendidikan dan Pengajaran)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33578/pjr.v7i2.9210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在通过测试技术评估小学五年级学生的数学学习情况。本研究是一种使用事后方法的定量描述性研究。本研究中使用的工具是数学主题题,由20个项目组成,通过对学生的笔试技术收集。使用Winstep程序辅助的Rasch模型,通过包括有效性、可靠性和难度水平测试在内的经验有效性过程,对获得的数据进行分析。结果表明,在有效性测试中,项目是无效的,在可靠性测试中有两种类型,即人的可靠性被归类为非常好,而项目的可靠性被分类为弱。而从结果上看,难度等级的问题,类别是很难的。本研究的意义在于,本研究可作为其他研究人员进行项目准备和分析研究的参考。在设计问题时,希望对测试中讨论的材料进行审查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ANALYSIS OF THEME 9 MATHEMATICS 5 TH GRADE MATHEMATICS QUESTIONS AT SDIT RAUDHATURRAHMAH PEKANBARU
This study aims to evaluate learning through test techniques, which are conducted on 5th grade elementary school students, Mathematics subject. This research is a type of quantitative descriptive research using the ex post facto method. The instrument used in this study was in the form of math subject matter questions consisting of 20 items collected through a written test technique on students. The data obtained were analyzed using the Rasch Model assisted by the Winstep program through an empirical validity process including validity, reliability and difficulty level tests. The results showed that in the validity test, items were invalid, in the reliability test there were 2 types, namely Person Reliability which was categorized as very good, while Item Reliability was categorized as weak. Whereas on the results of the difficulty level of the questions, the category is very difficult. The implication of this research is that this research can be used as a reference for other researchers in conducting research on the preparation and analysis of item items. At the time of designing the questions, it is hoped that a review will be carried out regarding the material that will be discussed in the test.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
130
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信