智力残疾人痴呆症评估服务的比较

IF 0.5 Q4 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
E. Gardner, S. Slater
{"title":"智力残疾人痴呆症评估服务的比较","authors":"E. Gardner, S. Slater","doi":"10.1108/tldr-11-2020-0033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to describe three dementia assessment services for people with intellectual disabilities to provide professionals with insight into planning this type of service.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThree services in England were contacted via email and telephone to collect data on their service provision. They were asked about the average age of individuals when receiving a baseline assessment, frequency of follow-up assessment, assessment instruments used and descriptive aspects of their services.\n\n\nFindings\nAll three services offered proactive dementia assessment services to people with Down's syndrome (DS), with one service providing systematic screening via the GP. None offered proactive screening to people with intellectual disabilities who did not have a diagnosis of DS. All offered reactive assessment to this population if they experienced a decline in function. Services differed in terms of age at which baseline assessments were offered, frequency of follow-up and instruments used.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first paper to compare dementia assessment provision between different services in England.\n","PeriodicalId":54179,"journal":{"name":"Tizard Learning Disability Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of dementia assessment services for people with intellectual disabilities\",\"authors\":\"E. Gardner, S. Slater\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/tldr-11-2020-0033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThis paper aims to describe three dementia assessment services for people with intellectual disabilities to provide professionals with insight into planning this type of service.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThree services in England were contacted via email and telephone to collect data on their service provision. They were asked about the average age of individuals when receiving a baseline assessment, frequency of follow-up assessment, assessment instruments used and descriptive aspects of their services.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nAll three services offered proactive dementia assessment services to people with Down's syndrome (DS), with one service providing systematic screening via the GP. None offered proactive screening to people with intellectual disabilities who did not have a diagnosis of DS. All offered reactive assessment to this population if they experienced a decline in function. Services differed in terms of age at which baseline assessments were offered, frequency of follow-up and instruments used.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first paper to compare dementia assessment provision between different services in England.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":54179,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tizard Learning Disability Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tizard Learning Disability Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/tldr-11-2020-0033\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tizard Learning Disability Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/tldr-11-2020-0033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的本文旨在描述三种针对智障人士的痴呆症评估服务,为专业人士提供规划此类服务的见解。设计/方法/方法通过电子邮件和电话联系了英国的三家服务机构,以收集其服务提供的数据。他们被问及接受基线评估时个人的平均年龄、后续评估的频率、使用的评估工具以及他们服务的描述性方面。Findings这三项服务都为唐氏综合征患者提供了积极的痴呆症评估服务,其中一项服务通过全科医生提供系统筛查。没有一项服务为未被诊断为唐氏综合症的智障患者提供积极的筛查。如果这些人的功能下降,所有服务都为他们提供反应性评估。服务在提供基线评估的年龄、随访频率和使用的工具方面有所不同。原创性/价值据作者所知,这是第一篇比较英国不同服务之间痴呆症评估提供情况的论文。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparison of dementia assessment services for people with intellectual disabilities
Purpose This paper aims to describe three dementia assessment services for people with intellectual disabilities to provide professionals with insight into planning this type of service. Design/methodology/approach Three services in England were contacted via email and telephone to collect data on their service provision. They were asked about the average age of individuals when receiving a baseline assessment, frequency of follow-up assessment, assessment instruments used and descriptive aspects of their services. Findings All three services offered proactive dementia assessment services to people with Down's syndrome (DS), with one service providing systematic screening via the GP. None offered proactive screening to people with intellectual disabilities who did not have a diagnosis of DS. All offered reactive assessment to this population if they experienced a decline in function. Services differed in terms of age at which baseline assessments were offered, frequency of follow-up and instruments used. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first paper to compare dementia assessment provision between different services in England.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tizard Learning Disability Review
Tizard Learning Disability Review EDUCATION, SPECIAL-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信