教科书太高了:呼吁对OER进行更公正的评估

IF 0.1 4区 文学 0 LITERATURE
CEA CRITIC Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI:10.1353/cea.2022.0011
Brandy Bagar-Fraley
{"title":"教科书太高了:呼吁对OER进行更公正的评估","authors":"Brandy Bagar-Fraley","doi":"10.1353/cea.2022.0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:As a response to rising textbook costs, the emergence of Open Educational Resources (OERs) has been welcomed by many institutions, teachers, and students. OERs are a free alternative to the traditional textbook, one that promises both access and equity. However, without care, the implementation of OERs can complicate or even worsen the problem they are meant to solve. In particular, the current and consistent lack of appropriate pedagogical framing and relevant faculty support can actually render OERs a barrier, rather than a boon, to student success.","PeriodicalId":41558,"journal":{"name":"CEA CRITIC","volume":"84 1","pages":"75 - 82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Textbooks Are Too Damn High: Calling for a More Nuanced Evaluation of OERs\",\"authors\":\"Brandy Bagar-Fraley\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/cea.2022.0011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:As a response to rising textbook costs, the emergence of Open Educational Resources (OERs) has been welcomed by many institutions, teachers, and students. OERs are a free alternative to the traditional textbook, one that promises both access and equity. However, without care, the implementation of OERs can complicate or even worsen the problem they are meant to solve. In particular, the current and consistent lack of appropriate pedagogical framing and relevant faculty support can actually render OERs a barrier, rather than a boon, to student success.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41558,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CEA CRITIC\",\"volume\":\"84 1\",\"pages\":\"75 - 82\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CEA CRITIC\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/cea.2022.0011\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CEA CRITIC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cea.2022.0011","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:作为对不断上涨的教科书成本的回应,开放教育资源(OER)的出现受到了许多机构、教师和学生的欢迎。OER是传统教科书的一种免费替代品,它承诺了获取和公平。然而,如果不小心,OER的实施可能会使它们本应解决的问题复杂化,甚至恶化。特别是,目前一直缺乏适当的教学框架和相关的教师支持,这实际上会使OER成为学生成功的障碍,而不是福音。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Textbooks Are Too Damn High: Calling for a More Nuanced Evaluation of OERs
Abstract:As a response to rising textbook costs, the emergence of Open Educational Resources (OERs) has been welcomed by many institutions, teachers, and students. OERs are a free alternative to the traditional textbook, one that promises both access and equity. However, without care, the implementation of OERs can complicate or even worsen the problem they are meant to solve. In particular, the current and consistent lack of appropriate pedagogical framing and relevant faculty support can actually render OERs a barrier, rather than a boon, to student success.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CEA CRITIC
CEA CRITIC LITERATURE-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信