甲氧西林敏感和耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌临床菌株非靶向脂质组学差异

IF 4 4区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Philip Nikolic, Poonam Mudgil, D. Harman, J. Whitehall
{"title":"甲氧西林敏感和耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌临床菌株非靶向脂质组学差异","authors":"Philip Nikolic, Poonam Mudgil, D. Harman, J. Whitehall","doi":"10.1080/23744235.2022.2049863","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background Staphylococcus aureus is a common cause of infectious diseases in humans. It has become resistant to many antibacterial agents making management of infections difficult. A better understanding of differences among S. aureus strains that are sensitive and resistant to antibiotics may offer insights into the resistant phenotype and identify new antimicrobial targets. This study aimed at comparing general differences in lipid profiles among clinical strains of S. aureus sensitive and resistant to antibiotics. The cell wall thickness and cell surface charge were also compared. Methods Five methicillin sensitive (MSSA) and five methicillin resistant (MRSA) S. aureus strains were compared both individually and as MSSA and MRSA groups in the absence of antibiotics. Lipids were compared by ultra-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, cell wall thickness was compared by scanning transmission electron microscopy and whole-cell surface charge was compared using a cytochrome c binding assay. Results Twenty-two lipid species were identified in all ten strains of S. aureus. The abundance of three lipid species (two lysyl-phosphatidylglycerol and one diglycosyldiacylglycerol) were found to be different between MSSA and MRSA. Differences in cell wall thickness were identified between strains but not between MSSA and MRSA. No difference in whole-cell surface charge was observed between MSSA and MRSA. Conclusion This study shows differences in membrane lipids between antibiotic sensitive and antibiotic resistant clinical strains of S aureus that may affect resistance mechanisms related to cell membrane structure and fluidity. Further research on these differences may identify new drug targets against resistant strains.","PeriodicalId":13671,"journal":{"name":"Infectious Diseases","volume":"54 1","pages":"497 - 507"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Untargeted lipidomic differences between clinical strains of methicillin-sensitive and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus\",\"authors\":\"Philip Nikolic, Poonam Mudgil, D. Harman, J. Whitehall\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23744235.2022.2049863\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Background Staphylococcus aureus is a common cause of infectious diseases in humans. It has become resistant to many antibacterial agents making management of infections difficult. A better understanding of differences among S. aureus strains that are sensitive and resistant to antibiotics may offer insights into the resistant phenotype and identify new antimicrobial targets. This study aimed at comparing general differences in lipid profiles among clinical strains of S. aureus sensitive and resistant to antibiotics. The cell wall thickness and cell surface charge were also compared. Methods Five methicillin sensitive (MSSA) and five methicillin resistant (MRSA) S. aureus strains were compared both individually and as MSSA and MRSA groups in the absence of antibiotics. Lipids were compared by ultra-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, cell wall thickness was compared by scanning transmission electron microscopy and whole-cell surface charge was compared using a cytochrome c binding assay. Results Twenty-two lipid species were identified in all ten strains of S. aureus. The abundance of three lipid species (two lysyl-phosphatidylglycerol and one diglycosyldiacylglycerol) were found to be different between MSSA and MRSA. Differences in cell wall thickness were identified between strains but not between MSSA and MRSA. No difference in whole-cell surface charge was observed between MSSA and MRSA. Conclusion This study shows differences in membrane lipids between antibiotic sensitive and antibiotic resistant clinical strains of S aureus that may affect resistance mechanisms related to cell membrane structure and fluidity. Further research on these differences may identify new drug targets against resistant strains.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13671,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infectious Diseases\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"497 - 507\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infectious Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23744235.2022.2049863\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23744235.2022.2049863","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

摘要背景金黄色葡萄球菌是人类感染性疾病的常见病因。它已对许多抗菌剂产生耐药性,使感染管理变得困难。更好地了解对抗生素敏感和耐药的金黄色葡萄球菌菌株之间的差异可能有助于了解耐药表型并确定新的抗菌靶点。本研究旨在比较对抗生素敏感和耐药的金黄色葡萄球菌临床菌株的脂质谱的一般差异。比较了细胞壁厚度和细胞表面电荷。方法对5株甲氧西林敏感(MSSA)金黄色葡萄球菌和5株耐药(MRSA)金黄色葡萄球菌进行单独比较,并在无抗生素情况下分别作为MSSA组和MRSA组进行比较。用超高效液相色谱-质谱法比较脂质,用扫描透射电镜比较细胞壁厚度,用细胞色素c结合法比较全细胞表面电荷。结果10株金黄色葡萄球菌共鉴定出22种脂质。三种脂类(两种赖基磷脂酰甘油和一种二糖基二酰甘油)的丰度在MSSA和MRSA之间存在差异。菌株之间细胞壁厚度存在差异,但MSSA与MRSA之间没有差异。msa和MRSA在全细胞表面电荷上没有差异。结论临床金黄色葡萄球菌对抗生素敏感和耐药菌株的膜脂含量存在差异,可能影响其耐药机制与细胞膜结构和流动性有关。对这些差异的进一步研究可能会发现针对耐药菌株的新药物靶点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Untargeted lipidomic differences between clinical strains of methicillin-sensitive and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
Abstract Background Staphylococcus aureus is a common cause of infectious diseases in humans. It has become resistant to many antibacterial agents making management of infections difficult. A better understanding of differences among S. aureus strains that are sensitive and resistant to antibiotics may offer insights into the resistant phenotype and identify new antimicrobial targets. This study aimed at comparing general differences in lipid profiles among clinical strains of S. aureus sensitive and resistant to antibiotics. The cell wall thickness and cell surface charge were also compared. Methods Five methicillin sensitive (MSSA) and five methicillin resistant (MRSA) S. aureus strains were compared both individually and as MSSA and MRSA groups in the absence of antibiotics. Lipids were compared by ultra-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, cell wall thickness was compared by scanning transmission electron microscopy and whole-cell surface charge was compared using a cytochrome c binding assay. Results Twenty-two lipid species were identified in all ten strains of S. aureus. The abundance of three lipid species (two lysyl-phosphatidylglycerol and one diglycosyldiacylglycerol) were found to be different between MSSA and MRSA. Differences in cell wall thickness were identified between strains but not between MSSA and MRSA. No difference in whole-cell surface charge was observed between MSSA and MRSA. Conclusion This study shows differences in membrane lipids between antibiotic sensitive and antibiotic resistant clinical strains of S aureus that may affect resistance mechanisms related to cell membrane structure and fluidity. Further research on these differences may identify new drug targets against resistant strains.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Infectious Diseases
Infectious Diseases INFECTIOUS DISEASES-
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
1.70%
发文量
92
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Infectious Diseases (formerly Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases) is a peer-reviewed journal publishing articles on all aspects of human infection, including pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of infectious diseases, and also on medical microbiology and epidemiology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信