三坐标测量机测量平面度误差与加工过程特性的函数相关性研究

IF 1 4区 工程技术 Q4 INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION
B. Strbac, D. Rodić, M. Delić, B. Savković, M. Hadzistevic
{"title":"三坐标测量机测量平面度误差与加工过程特性的函数相关性研究","authors":"B. Strbac, D. Rodić, M. Delić, B. Savković, M. Hadzistevic","doi":"10.2478/msr-2021-0022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Numerous studies have shown that the choice of measurement strategy (number and position of measurement points) when measuring form error on a coordinate-measuring machine (CMM) depends on the characteristics of the machining process which was used to machine the examined surface. The accuracy of form error assessment is the primary goal of verification procedures and accuracy is considered perfect only in the case of the ideal verification operator. Since the ideal verification operator in the “point-by-point” measuring mode is almost never used in practice, the aim of this study was to examine a relationship which had not been examined in earlier studies, namely how the machining process, surface roughness and a reduced number of points in the measurement strategy affect the accuracy of flatness error assessment. The research included four most common cutting processes applied to flat surfaces divided into nine different classes of roughness. In order to determine functional dependency between the observed input variables and the output, statistical regression models and neuro-fuzzy logic (artificial intelligence tool) were used. The analyses confirmed the significance of all three input parameters, with surface roughness being the most significant one. Both the statistical regression models and neuro-fuzzy models proved to be adequate, matching the experimental results. The use of these models makes it possible to determine flatness error measured on a CMM if input variables considered in the paper are known.","PeriodicalId":49848,"journal":{"name":"Measurement Science Review","volume":"21 1","pages":"158 - 167"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigation of Functional Dependency between the Characteristics of the Machining Process and Flatness Error Measured on a CMM\",\"authors\":\"B. Strbac, D. Rodić, M. Delić, B. Savković, M. Hadzistevic\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/msr-2021-0022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Numerous studies have shown that the choice of measurement strategy (number and position of measurement points) when measuring form error on a coordinate-measuring machine (CMM) depends on the characteristics of the machining process which was used to machine the examined surface. The accuracy of form error assessment is the primary goal of verification procedures and accuracy is considered perfect only in the case of the ideal verification operator. Since the ideal verification operator in the “point-by-point” measuring mode is almost never used in practice, the aim of this study was to examine a relationship which had not been examined in earlier studies, namely how the machining process, surface roughness and a reduced number of points in the measurement strategy affect the accuracy of flatness error assessment. The research included four most common cutting processes applied to flat surfaces divided into nine different classes of roughness. In order to determine functional dependency between the observed input variables and the output, statistical regression models and neuro-fuzzy logic (artificial intelligence tool) were used. The analyses confirmed the significance of all three input parameters, with surface roughness being the most significant one. Both the statistical regression models and neuro-fuzzy models proved to be adequate, matching the experimental results. The use of these models makes it possible to determine flatness error measured on a CMM if input variables considered in the paper are known.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49848,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Measurement Science Review\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"158 - 167\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Measurement Science Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/msr-2021-0022\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Measurement Science Review","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/msr-2021-0022","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要大量研究表明,在三坐标测量机上测量形状误差时,测量策略(测点的个数和位置)的选择取决于被测表面加工过程的特点。表单误差评估的准确性是验证程序的主要目标,只有在理想的验证操作符的情况下,准确性才被认为是完美的。由于“逐点”测量模式中的理想验证算子在实践中几乎从未使用过,因此本研究的目的是研究早期研究中未研究的关系,即加工工艺、表面粗糙度和测量策略中减少的点数如何影响平面度误差评估的准确性。该研究包括四种最常见的切割工艺,用于将平面划分为九种不同级别的粗糙度。为了确定观察到的输入变量与输出之间的函数依赖关系,使用了统计回归模型和神经模糊逻辑(人工智能工具)。分析证实了三个输入参数的显著性,其中表面粗糙度是最显著的。统计回归模型和神经模糊模型均能满足实验要求。如果论文中考虑的输入变量是已知的,使用这些模型可以确定在三坐标测量机上测量的平面度误差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investigation of Functional Dependency between the Characteristics of the Machining Process and Flatness Error Measured on a CMM
Abstract Numerous studies have shown that the choice of measurement strategy (number and position of measurement points) when measuring form error on a coordinate-measuring machine (CMM) depends on the characteristics of the machining process which was used to machine the examined surface. The accuracy of form error assessment is the primary goal of verification procedures and accuracy is considered perfect only in the case of the ideal verification operator. Since the ideal verification operator in the “point-by-point” measuring mode is almost never used in practice, the aim of this study was to examine a relationship which had not been examined in earlier studies, namely how the machining process, surface roughness and a reduced number of points in the measurement strategy affect the accuracy of flatness error assessment. The research included four most common cutting processes applied to flat surfaces divided into nine different classes of roughness. In order to determine functional dependency between the observed input variables and the output, statistical regression models and neuro-fuzzy logic (artificial intelligence tool) were used. The analyses confirmed the significance of all three input parameters, with surface roughness being the most significant one. Both the statistical regression models and neuro-fuzzy models proved to be adequate, matching the experimental results. The use of these models makes it possible to determine flatness error measured on a CMM if input variables considered in the paper are known.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Measurement Science Review
Measurement Science Review INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
37
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: - theory of measurement - mathematical processing of measured data - measurement uncertainty minimisation - statistical methods in data evaluation and modelling - measurement as an interdisciplinary activity - measurement science in education - medical imaging methods, image processing - biosignal measurement, processing and analysis - model based biomeasurements - neural networks in biomeasurement - telemeasurement in biomedicine - measurement in nanomedicine - measurement of basic physical quantities - magnetic and electric fields measurements - measurement of geometrical and mechanical quantities - optical measuring methods - electromagnetic compatibility - measurement in material science
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信