经过与未经过专业后培训的物理治疗师临床能力与工作职责的比较

Journal, physical therapy education Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1097/JTE.0000000000000295
Matthew S Briggs, Nicholas Gulla, Heidi Howald, Mark D Weber, Becky J Olson-Kellogg, John J DeWitt, Craig P Hensley, Kendra L Harrington, Melissa S Kidder, Joseph P Farrell, Carol Jo Tichenor
{"title":"经过与未经过专业后培训的物理治疗师临床能力与工作职责的比较","authors":"Matthew S Briggs, Nicholas Gulla, Heidi Howald, Mark D Weber, Becky J Olson-Kellogg, John J DeWitt, Craig P Hensley, Kendra L Harrington, Melissa S Kidder, Joseph P Farrell, Carol Jo Tichenor","doi":"10.1097/JTE.0000000000000295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Understanding how educational pathways may influence clinical competence and work responsibilities is important in providing guidance to academic and clinic stakeholders and physical therapists (PTs) on PT career development. The purpose of this paper was to compare perceived clinical competency and job duties between PTs with formal mentored postprofessional clinical education with PTs without formal postprofessional clinical education.</p><p><strong>Review of literature: </strong>The understanding of self-perceived clinical competence of PTs overall in the United States is limited, especially as related to the impact of postprofessional education. Furthermore, there is limited understanding of the career pathways and development of job duties of PTs in the United States.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Two thousand three hundred thirty-four PTs in the United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey was sent to licensed PTs. This survey included items measuring self-perceived clinical competency and questions related to weekly job responsibilities. Participants were categorized as residency trained, fellowship trained, or non-residency/fellowship trained. Frequency analyses and Kruskal-Wallis tests with pairwise post hoc tests were performed comparing the 3 groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Residency-trained (P < .007) and fellowship-trained (P < .001) groups demonstrated elements of higher self-perceived clinical competency compared with the non-residency-/fellowship-trained group. Both the residency- and fellowship-trained groups spent less time with patient care and more time with other responsibilities (e.g., teaching, mentoring, and research) (P < .02) during an average workweek. Fellowship-trained PTs (P < .001) spent more time with administrative duties compared with the non-residency-/fellowship-trained group.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>Results from this paper demonstrate that residency- and fellowship-trained PTs have elements of higher self-perceived clinical competency and spend more of their job duties outside of direct patient care compared with PTs who were not residency or fellowship trained. These results may help guide PTs, academic institutions, and employers in planning and achieving specific career paths.</p>","PeriodicalId":91351,"journal":{"name":"Journal, physical therapy education","volume":" ","pages":"332-341"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparisons of Clinical Competency and Job Responsibilities of Physical Therapists With and Without Postprofessional Training.\",\"authors\":\"Matthew S Briggs, Nicholas Gulla, Heidi Howald, Mark D Weber, Becky J Olson-Kellogg, John J DeWitt, Craig P Hensley, Kendra L Harrington, Melissa S Kidder, Joseph P Farrell, Carol Jo Tichenor\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JTE.0000000000000295\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Understanding how educational pathways may influence clinical competence and work responsibilities is important in providing guidance to academic and clinic stakeholders and physical therapists (PTs) on PT career development. The purpose of this paper was to compare perceived clinical competency and job duties between PTs with formal mentored postprofessional clinical education with PTs without formal postprofessional clinical education.</p><p><strong>Review of literature: </strong>The understanding of self-perceived clinical competence of PTs overall in the United States is limited, especially as related to the impact of postprofessional education. Furthermore, there is limited understanding of the career pathways and development of job duties of PTs in the United States.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Two thousand three hundred thirty-four PTs in the United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey was sent to licensed PTs. This survey included items measuring self-perceived clinical competency and questions related to weekly job responsibilities. Participants were categorized as residency trained, fellowship trained, or non-residency/fellowship trained. Frequency analyses and Kruskal-Wallis tests with pairwise post hoc tests were performed comparing the 3 groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Residency-trained (P < .007) and fellowship-trained (P < .001) groups demonstrated elements of higher self-perceived clinical competency compared with the non-residency-/fellowship-trained group. Both the residency- and fellowship-trained groups spent less time with patient care and more time with other responsibilities (e.g., teaching, mentoring, and research) (P < .02) during an average workweek. Fellowship-trained PTs (P < .001) spent more time with administrative duties compared with the non-residency-/fellowship-trained group.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>Results from this paper demonstrate that residency- and fellowship-trained PTs have elements of higher self-perceived clinical competency and spend more of their job duties outside of direct patient care compared with PTs who were not residency or fellowship trained. These results may help guide PTs, academic institutions, and employers in planning and achieving specific career paths.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":91351,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal, physical therapy education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"332-341\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal, physical therapy education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JTE.0000000000000295\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal, physical therapy education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JTE.0000000000000295","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

了解教育途径如何影响临床能力和工作责任,对于为学术和临床利益相关者以及物理治疗师(PT)提供PT职业发展指导至关重要。本文的目的是比较接受过正式指导的专业后临床教育的PT和没有接受过正式专业后临床教学的PT之间的感知临床能力和工作职责。在美国,对PT的自我感知临床能力的总体理解是有限的,尤其是与专业后教育的影响有关。此外,对美国PT的职业道路和工作职责的发展了解有限。美国二千三百三十四名PT。向获得许可的PT发送了一份在线调查。这项调查包括测量自我感知的临床能力和与每周工作职责相关的问题。参与者分为住院医师培训、奖学金培训或非住院医师/奖学金培训。对3组进行了频率分析和Kruskal–Wallis检验以及成对事后检验。与非住院/奖学金培训组相比,住院培训组(P<.007)和奖学金培训组(P<.001)表现出更高的自我感知临床能力。住院医师和研究金培训组在平均工作周内花在患者护理上的时间较少,花在其他职责上的时间较多(如教学、指导和研究)(P<.02)。与非居住/奖学金培训组相比,奖学金培训的PT(P<.001)在行政职责上花费的时间更多。本文的结果表明,与未接受住院或奖学金培训的PT相比,接受住院和奖学金培训的PTs具有更高的自我认知临床能力,并且在直接患者护理之外花费更多的工作职责。这些结果可能有助于指导PT、学术机构和雇主规划和实现特定的职业道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparisons of Clinical Competency and Job Responsibilities of Physical Therapists With and Without Postprofessional Training.

Introduction: Understanding how educational pathways may influence clinical competence and work responsibilities is important in providing guidance to academic and clinic stakeholders and physical therapists (PTs) on PT career development. The purpose of this paper was to compare perceived clinical competency and job duties between PTs with formal mentored postprofessional clinical education with PTs without formal postprofessional clinical education.

Review of literature: The understanding of self-perceived clinical competence of PTs overall in the United States is limited, especially as related to the impact of postprofessional education. Furthermore, there is limited understanding of the career pathways and development of job duties of PTs in the United States.

Subjects: Two thousand three hundred thirty-four PTs in the United States.

Methods: An online survey was sent to licensed PTs. This survey included items measuring self-perceived clinical competency and questions related to weekly job responsibilities. Participants were categorized as residency trained, fellowship trained, or non-residency/fellowship trained. Frequency analyses and Kruskal-Wallis tests with pairwise post hoc tests were performed comparing the 3 groups.

Results: Residency-trained (P < .007) and fellowship-trained (P < .001) groups demonstrated elements of higher self-perceived clinical competency compared with the non-residency-/fellowship-trained group. Both the residency- and fellowship-trained groups spent less time with patient care and more time with other responsibilities (e.g., teaching, mentoring, and research) (P < .02) during an average workweek. Fellowship-trained PTs (P < .001) spent more time with administrative duties compared with the non-residency-/fellowship-trained group.

Discussion and conclusion: Results from this paper demonstrate that residency- and fellowship-trained PTs have elements of higher self-perceived clinical competency and spend more of their job duties outside of direct patient care compared with PTs who were not residency or fellowship trained. These results may help guide PTs, academic institutions, and employers in planning and achieving specific career paths.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信