有内容还是没有内容的方法?关于质的研究教学的几点思考

Elizabeth M. Pope, Aaron M. Kuntz
{"title":"有内容还是没有内容的方法?关于质的研究教学的几点思考","authors":"Elizabeth M. Pope, Aaron M. Kuntz","doi":"10.1177/19408447231188050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is no shortage of scholarship focusing on qualitative pedagogy. However, very little has been written about the tension in the classroom between teaching methods and the content instructors use to do so. The relationship between methods and content is critical to the success of any class. In this paper, we discuss the pedagogical choices of two professors and the consequences, both good and ill, of such choices. Each takes a different approach. We examine the follow-through of each choice practically and theoretically. We discuss the dichotomy of “methodologies despite content” vs. “methodologies without content” and the implications of each in teaching qualitative inquiry.","PeriodicalId":90874,"journal":{"name":"International review of qualitative research : IRQR","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Methods Despite or Without Content? Reflections on Teaching Qualitative Research\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth M. Pope, Aaron M. Kuntz\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/19408447231188050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There is no shortage of scholarship focusing on qualitative pedagogy. However, very little has been written about the tension in the classroom between teaching methods and the content instructors use to do so. The relationship between methods and content is critical to the success of any class. In this paper, we discuss the pedagogical choices of two professors and the consequences, both good and ill, of such choices. Each takes a different approach. We examine the follow-through of each choice practically and theoretically. We discuss the dichotomy of “methodologies despite content” vs. “methodologies without content” and the implications of each in teaching qualitative inquiry.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90874,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International review of qualitative research : IRQR\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International review of qualitative research : IRQR\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/19408447231188050\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International review of qualitative research : IRQR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19408447231188050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

注重质量教育学的学术并不缺乏。然而,很少有关于课堂教学方法和教师使用的内容之间的紧张关系的文章。方法和内容之间的关系对任何课堂的成功都至关重要。在本文中,我们讨论了两位教授的教学选择,以及这种选择的后果,包括好的和坏的。每种方法都不同。我们从实践和理论上考察了每一个选择的后续过程。我们讨论了“有内容的方法论”与“没有内容的方法学”的二分法,以及它们在质性探究教学中的含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Methods Despite or Without Content? Reflections on Teaching Qualitative Research
There is no shortage of scholarship focusing on qualitative pedagogy. However, very little has been written about the tension in the classroom between teaching methods and the content instructors use to do so. The relationship between methods and content is critical to the success of any class. In this paper, we discuss the pedagogical choices of two professors and the consequences, both good and ill, of such choices. Each takes a different approach. We examine the follow-through of each choice practically and theoretically. We discuss the dichotomy of “methodologies despite content” vs. “methodologies without content” and the implications of each in teaching qualitative inquiry.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信