两种选择标记

IF 0.1 4区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
N. Zhang
{"title":"两种选择标记","authors":"N. Zhang","doi":"10.1075/ijchl.21002.zha","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Why does an argument clause contain a meaningless complementizer in languages such as English and German, but not\n in Mandarin; and why does an adverbial clause occur with a meaningless correlative adverb in the matrix clause in Mandarin, but\n not in languages such as English and German? Extending the c-selection from one type of sisterhood to another type of sisterhood,\n this paper recognizes the modification relation as a kind of selection relation, in addition to the familiar kind of\n argument-taking selection relation. This research argues that dependency marking is seen in different types of sister relations.\n It shows how Mandarin uses modification markers systematically, but does not use argument markers, also systematically. The paper\n explains the existence of modification markers in various constructions in Mandarin and in various languages. It lets us gain a\n better understanding of language variations.","PeriodicalId":41020,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Chinese Linguistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Two kinds of selection marking\",\"authors\":\"N. Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/ijchl.21002.zha\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Why does an argument clause contain a meaningless complementizer in languages such as English and German, but not\\n in Mandarin; and why does an adverbial clause occur with a meaningless correlative adverb in the matrix clause in Mandarin, but\\n not in languages such as English and German? Extending the c-selection from one type of sisterhood to another type of sisterhood,\\n this paper recognizes the modification relation as a kind of selection relation, in addition to the familiar kind of\\n argument-taking selection relation. This research argues that dependency marking is seen in different types of sister relations.\\n It shows how Mandarin uses modification markers systematically, but does not use argument markers, also systematically. The paper\\n explains the existence of modification markers in various constructions in Mandarin and in various languages. It lets us gain a\\n better understanding of language variations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41020,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Chinese Linguistics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Chinese Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/ijchl.21002.zha\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Chinese Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/ijchl.21002.zha","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为什么论证子句在英语和德语中包含无意义的补语,而在普通话中没有;为什么在汉语的矩阵从句中,状语从句与无意义的关联副词一起出现,而在英语和德语等语言中却没有?本文将c选择从一种类型的姐妹关系扩展到另一种类型的姐妹关系,将修正关系作为一种选择关系,而不是我们所熟悉的那种争论选择关系。本研究认为,依赖标记存在于不同类型的姐妹关系中。它显示了汉语是如何系统地使用修饰标记,而不是系统地使用论点标记。本文阐述了汉语和各种语言中各种结构中修饰语标记的存在。它让我们更好地理解语言的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Two kinds of selection marking
Why does an argument clause contain a meaningless complementizer in languages such as English and German, but not in Mandarin; and why does an adverbial clause occur with a meaningless correlative adverb in the matrix clause in Mandarin, but not in languages such as English and German? Extending the c-selection from one type of sisterhood to another type of sisterhood, this paper recognizes the modification relation as a kind of selection relation, in addition to the familiar kind of argument-taking selection relation. This research argues that dependency marking is seen in different types of sister relations. It shows how Mandarin uses modification markers systematically, but does not use argument markers, also systematically. The paper explains the existence of modification markers in various constructions in Mandarin and in various languages. It lets us gain a better understanding of language variations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信