学生和教师在网络课程中对图书馆员专业知识的利用不足

IF 0.4 Q4 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
K. MacKenzie
{"title":"学生和教师在网络课程中对图书馆员专业知识的利用不足","authors":"K. MacKenzie","doi":"10.18438/eblip30114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A Review of:\nSteele, J.E. (2021). The role of the academic librarian in online courses: A case study. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 47(5), 102384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102384\nAbstract\nObjective – To examine the role of academic librarians in online courses in a university setting.\nDesign – Survey questionnaire.\nSetting – A multi-campus university in the southern United States.\nSubjects – Students, faculty, and librarians who had taken, taught, or assisted in fully online courses.\nMethods – Email addresses for potential survey participants were provided by the university office of institutional research. The researchers tailored survey questions weto specific subject groups. The surveys took roughly 15 minutes to complete and were open for 1 week following the original email. Surveys included 12 – 16 questions, depending on the version, and included questions relating to the use of librarians in online courses, the type of assistance they provided, and how assistance was provided (e.g., in person, email, live chat). Question types included yes/no, check-all-that-apply, and open-ended-answer.\nMain Results – Of the student responders, 23.24% reported asking a librarian for help with research or an assignment. This help included finding resources (34.48%), database searching (28.57%), and searching the library catalog (20.69%). Help was given over email (28.03%), live chat (31.82%), and in person (17.42%), which was reported to be most helpful by several students. Only 10.61% reported using video-conferencing software such as Zoom.\nOnly 5.88% of faculty reported including a librarian for synchronous instruction in online courses, while 19.12% made use of asynchronous tutorials created by a librarian. The majority of respondents (93.1%) had not worked with an embedded librarian in their courses, and many reported not knowing that it was an option. Instead, faculty perceived librarians to be an outside resource.\nBoth faculty members and students reported a desire for more video tutorials from librarians. Several faculty mentioned wanting a library module that could serve as an introduction to the library, library resources, and basic instruction topics such as citation styles.\nConclusion – While some students and faculty have worked with librarians in online courses and welcomed their involvement, there is room for improvement in library outreach, including how the library communicates with and supports this growing population.","PeriodicalId":45227,"journal":{"name":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Librarian Expertise is Under-Utilized by Students and Faculty in Online Courses\",\"authors\":\"K. MacKenzie\",\"doi\":\"10.18438/eblip30114\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A Review of:\\nSteele, J.E. (2021). The role of the academic librarian in online courses: A case study. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 47(5), 102384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102384\\nAbstract\\nObjective – To examine the role of academic librarians in online courses in a university setting.\\nDesign – Survey questionnaire.\\nSetting – A multi-campus university in the southern United States.\\nSubjects – Students, faculty, and librarians who had taken, taught, or assisted in fully online courses.\\nMethods – Email addresses for potential survey participants were provided by the university office of institutional research. The researchers tailored survey questions weto specific subject groups. The surveys took roughly 15 minutes to complete and were open for 1 week following the original email. Surveys included 12 – 16 questions, depending on the version, and included questions relating to the use of librarians in online courses, the type of assistance they provided, and how assistance was provided (e.g., in person, email, live chat). Question types included yes/no, check-all-that-apply, and open-ended-answer.\\nMain Results – Of the student responders, 23.24% reported asking a librarian for help with research or an assignment. This help included finding resources (34.48%), database searching (28.57%), and searching the library catalog (20.69%). Help was given over email (28.03%), live chat (31.82%), and in person (17.42%), which was reported to be most helpful by several students. Only 10.61% reported using video-conferencing software such as Zoom.\\nOnly 5.88% of faculty reported including a librarian for synchronous instruction in online courses, while 19.12% made use of asynchronous tutorials created by a librarian. The majority of respondents (93.1%) had not worked with an embedded librarian in their courses, and many reported not knowing that it was an option. Instead, faculty perceived librarians to be an outside resource.\\nBoth faculty members and students reported a desire for more video tutorials from librarians. Several faculty mentioned wanting a library module that could serve as an introduction to the library, library resources, and basic instruction topics such as citation styles.\\nConclusion – While some students and faculty have worked with librarians in online courses and welcomed their involvement, there is room for improvement in library outreach, including how the library communicates with and supports this growing population.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45227,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip30114\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip30114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

综述:斯蒂尔,J.E.(2021)。学术图书馆员在网络课程中的作用:一个案例研究。《学术图书馆学杂志》,47(5),102384。https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102384AbstractObjective–研究学术图书馆员在大学环境中在线课程中的作用。设计——调查问卷。背景——美国南部的一所多校区大学。受试者——参加、教授或协助过完全在线课程的学生、教师和图书馆员。方法——潜在调查参与者的电子邮件地址由大学机构研究办公室提供。研究人员为特定的受试者群体量身定制了调查问题。调查大约花了15分钟完成,在收到原始电子邮件后开放了一周。调查包括12-16个问题,具体取决于版本,包括与图书馆员在在线课程中的使用、他们提供的援助类型以及如何提供援助(例如,面对面、电子邮件、实时聊天)有关的问题。问题类型包括是/否、勾选所有适用的问题和开放式回答。主要结果——在学生回答者中,23.24%的人报告称向图书管理员寻求研究或作业方面的帮助。这种帮助包括查找资源(34.48%)、数据库搜索(28.57%)和搜索图书馆目录(20.69%)。通过电子邮件(28.03%)、实时聊天(31.82%)和面对面(17.42%)提供帮助,据报道,这对一些学生最有帮助。只有10.61%的教师报告使用Zoom等视频会议软件。只有5.88%的教师报告在在线课程中包括一名图书管理员进行同步教学,而19.12%的教师使用了图书管理员创建的异步教程。大多数受访者(93.1%)在课程中没有与嵌入式图书管理员合作过,许多人表示不知道这是一种选择。相反,教员们认为图书馆员是一种外部资源。教职工和学生都表示希望图书馆员提供更多的视频教程。几位教员提到想要一个图书馆模块,可以作为图书馆、图书馆资源和引文风格等基本教学主题的介绍。结论——尽管一些学生和教职员工在在线课程中与图书馆员合作,并欢迎他们的参与,但图书馆的外联工作仍有改进的空间,包括图书馆如何与不断增长的人口沟通和支持他们。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Librarian Expertise is Under-Utilized by Students and Faculty in Online Courses
A Review of: Steele, J.E. (2021). The role of the academic librarian in online courses: A case study. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 47(5), 102384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102384 Abstract Objective – To examine the role of academic librarians in online courses in a university setting. Design – Survey questionnaire. Setting – A multi-campus university in the southern United States. Subjects – Students, faculty, and librarians who had taken, taught, or assisted in fully online courses. Methods – Email addresses for potential survey participants were provided by the university office of institutional research. The researchers tailored survey questions weto specific subject groups. The surveys took roughly 15 minutes to complete and were open for 1 week following the original email. Surveys included 12 – 16 questions, depending on the version, and included questions relating to the use of librarians in online courses, the type of assistance they provided, and how assistance was provided (e.g., in person, email, live chat). Question types included yes/no, check-all-that-apply, and open-ended-answer. Main Results – Of the student responders, 23.24% reported asking a librarian for help with research or an assignment. This help included finding resources (34.48%), database searching (28.57%), and searching the library catalog (20.69%). Help was given over email (28.03%), live chat (31.82%), and in person (17.42%), which was reported to be most helpful by several students. Only 10.61% reported using video-conferencing software such as Zoom. Only 5.88% of faculty reported including a librarian for synchronous instruction in online courses, while 19.12% made use of asynchronous tutorials created by a librarian. The majority of respondents (93.1%) had not worked with an embedded librarian in their courses, and many reported not knowing that it was an option. Instead, faculty perceived librarians to be an outside resource. Both faculty members and students reported a desire for more video tutorials from librarians. Several faculty mentioned wanting a library module that could serve as an introduction to the library, library resources, and basic instruction topics such as citation styles. Conclusion – While some students and faculty have worked with librarians in online courses and welcomed their involvement, there is room for improvement in library outreach, including how the library communicates with and supports this growing population.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Evidence Based Library and Information Practice
Evidence Based Library and Information Practice INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
44
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信