反映时代精神:英国食品、软饮料和包装行业企业社会责任政策分析

IF 3 Q2 MANAGEMENT
M. Topić, G. Bridge, Ralph Tench
{"title":"反映时代精神:英国食品、软饮料和包装行业企业社会责任政策分析","authors":"M. Topić, G. Bridge, Ralph Tench","doi":"10.1108/JGR-04-2020-0047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose \nThe purpose of this paper is to explore changes in corporate social responsibility (CSR) policies in food, soft drinks and packaging industries to capture changes in CSR implementation given increased environmental activism. The paper takes an exploratory approach in reviewing CSR policy changes to explore to what extent companies change CSR policies with increased environmentalism. \n \nDesign/methodology/approach \nA comparative website analysis was used to analyse CSR policies of companies in the food, soft drinks and packaging industries in the UK. The companies were selected for the analysis based on their annual turnover and 23 companies were analysed (seven for the soft drinks industry, eight for the food industry and eight for packaging industry). Five interviews were conducted with packaging and retail professionals, and the findings were analysed by using thematic analysis, which captured trends in responses. \n \nFindings \nThe findings show that companies are implementing and communicating CSR policies heavily focussed on reducing the environmental impact of their work and matching social debates on human rights, with which traditional CSR policies (corporate governance, supporting local communities and consultation with stakeholders) are fading away. Instead, companies have shifted attention towards the gender pay gap, modern slavery and extensive environmentalism. The interviews with packaging professionals and CSR managers from the retail industry show that the packaging industry designs CSR policies in line with requests from supermarkets, which are, in turn, influenced by consumer activism. \n \nPractical implications \nThis paper shows the circular relationship between media coverage, consumer activism, which comes as a result, and the impact and changes this brings to the industry. To avoid reputation damage, companies should closely follow media debates to pre-empty consumer criticism and activism. \n \nSocial implications \nThe findings show that companies are “mirroring the zeitgast” and going with trends to meet consumer expectations, which brings into question the sincerity of CSR policies and revives the criticism of capitalism and raises a question whether CSR is used by companies as a smokescreen that on the outset makes a difference to the society but keeps status quo intact. \n \nOriginality/value \nThe paper provides an insight into CSR implementation of three industries that faced heavy criticism from campaigners and the general public for their environmental impact. The paper shows how the CSR policy shifted to match this expectation and thus provides a good ground for studying the evolution of CSR using a case study from three selected industries.","PeriodicalId":45268,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Responsibility","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/JGR-04-2020-0047","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mirroring the zeitgeist: an analysis of CSR policies in the UK’s food, soft drink and packaging industries\",\"authors\":\"M. Topić, G. Bridge, Ralph Tench\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/JGR-04-2020-0047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose \\nThe purpose of this paper is to explore changes in corporate social responsibility (CSR) policies in food, soft drinks and packaging industries to capture changes in CSR implementation given increased environmental activism. The paper takes an exploratory approach in reviewing CSR policy changes to explore to what extent companies change CSR policies with increased environmentalism. \\n \\nDesign/methodology/approach \\nA comparative website analysis was used to analyse CSR policies of companies in the food, soft drinks and packaging industries in the UK. The companies were selected for the analysis based on their annual turnover and 23 companies were analysed (seven for the soft drinks industry, eight for the food industry and eight for packaging industry). Five interviews were conducted with packaging and retail professionals, and the findings were analysed by using thematic analysis, which captured trends in responses. \\n \\nFindings \\nThe findings show that companies are implementing and communicating CSR policies heavily focussed on reducing the environmental impact of their work and matching social debates on human rights, with which traditional CSR policies (corporate governance, supporting local communities and consultation with stakeholders) are fading away. Instead, companies have shifted attention towards the gender pay gap, modern slavery and extensive environmentalism. The interviews with packaging professionals and CSR managers from the retail industry show that the packaging industry designs CSR policies in line with requests from supermarkets, which are, in turn, influenced by consumer activism. \\n \\nPractical implications \\nThis paper shows the circular relationship between media coverage, consumer activism, which comes as a result, and the impact and changes this brings to the industry. To avoid reputation damage, companies should closely follow media debates to pre-empty consumer criticism and activism. \\n \\nSocial implications \\nThe findings show that companies are “mirroring the zeitgast” and going with trends to meet consumer expectations, which brings into question the sincerity of CSR policies and revives the criticism of capitalism and raises a question whether CSR is used by companies as a smokescreen that on the outset makes a difference to the society but keeps status quo intact. \\n \\nOriginality/value \\nThe paper provides an insight into CSR implementation of three industries that faced heavy criticism from campaigners and the general public for their environmental impact. The paper shows how the CSR policy shifted to match this expectation and thus provides a good ground for studying the evolution of CSR using a case study from three selected industries.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45268,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Global Responsibility\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/JGR-04-2020-0047\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Global Responsibility\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/JGR-04-2020-0047\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Responsibility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/JGR-04-2020-0047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

目的本文的目的是探讨食品、软饮料和包装行业企业社会责任(CSR)政策的变化,以捕捉环境行动主义增强后企业社会责任实施的变化。本文采用了一种探索性的方法来回顾企业社会责任政策的变化,以探索企业在多大程度上随着环保主义的增加而改变企业社会责任的政策。设计/方法/方法使用比较网站分析来分析英国食品、软饮料和包装行业公司的企业社会责任政策。根据公司的年营业额选择这些公司进行分析,并分析了23家公司(7家软饮料行业,8家食品行业和8家包装行业)。对包装和零售专业人士进行了五次采访,并通过主题分析对调查结果进行了分析,该分析捕捉了回应的趋势。调查结果研究结果表明,公司正在实施和传达企业社会责任政策,重点是减少其工作对环境的影响,并与人权方面的社会辩论相匹配,传统的企业社会责任(公司治理、支持当地社区和与利益相关者协商)正在逐渐消失。相反,公司将注意力转移到了性别薪酬差距、现代奴隶制和广泛的环保主义上。对零售业包装专业人士和企业社会责任经理的采访表明,包装业根据超市的要求设计企业社会责任政策,而超市又受到消费者行动主义的影响。实际意义本文展示了媒体报道、由此产生的消费者行动主义之间的循环关系,以及这给行业带来的影响和变化。为了避免声誉受损,公司应该密切关注媒体辩论,预先对消费者进行批评和行动主义。社会影响研究结果表明,企业正在“顺应时代潮流”,顺应潮流以满足消费者的期望,这让人们对企业社会责任政策的诚意产生了质疑,并重新引发了对资本主义的批评,并提出了一个问题,即企业社会责任是否被企业用作烟幕弹,从一开始就对社会产生了影响,但却保持了现状。原创性/价值本文深入了解了三个行业的企业社会责任实施情况,这三个行业因其对环境的影响而受到活动家和公众的严厉批评。本文通过对三个选定行业的案例研究,展示了企业社会责任政策如何转变以满足这一期望,从而为研究企业社会责任的演变提供了良好的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mirroring the zeitgeist: an analysis of CSR policies in the UK’s food, soft drink and packaging industries
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore changes in corporate social responsibility (CSR) policies in food, soft drinks and packaging industries to capture changes in CSR implementation given increased environmental activism. The paper takes an exploratory approach in reviewing CSR policy changes to explore to what extent companies change CSR policies with increased environmentalism. Design/methodology/approach A comparative website analysis was used to analyse CSR policies of companies in the food, soft drinks and packaging industries in the UK. The companies were selected for the analysis based on their annual turnover and 23 companies were analysed (seven for the soft drinks industry, eight for the food industry and eight for packaging industry). Five interviews were conducted with packaging and retail professionals, and the findings were analysed by using thematic analysis, which captured trends in responses. Findings The findings show that companies are implementing and communicating CSR policies heavily focussed on reducing the environmental impact of their work and matching social debates on human rights, with which traditional CSR policies (corporate governance, supporting local communities and consultation with stakeholders) are fading away. Instead, companies have shifted attention towards the gender pay gap, modern slavery and extensive environmentalism. The interviews with packaging professionals and CSR managers from the retail industry show that the packaging industry designs CSR policies in line with requests from supermarkets, which are, in turn, influenced by consumer activism. Practical implications This paper shows the circular relationship between media coverage, consumer activism, which comes as a result, and the impact and changes this brings to the industry. To avoid reputation damage, companies should closely follow media debates to pre-empty consumer criticism and activism. Social implications The findings show that companies are “mirroring the zeitgast” and going with trends to meet consumer expectations, which brings into question the sincerity of CSR policies and revives the criticism of capitalism and raises a question whether CSR is used by companies as a smokescreen that on the outset makes a difference to the society but keeps status quo intact. Originality/value The paper provides an insight into CSR implementation of three industries that faced heavy criticism from campaigners and the general public for their environmental impact. The paper shows how the CSR policy shifted to match this expectation and thus provides a good ground for studying the evolution of CSR using a case study from three selected industries.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
18.80%
发文量
22
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信