当奥密克戎敲门时:病毒接近度和亲社会行为之间的倒U型关系

IF 6.2 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 Multidisciplinary
Cheng Zhang , Lixian Qian , Wen Yu , Jian-Qiang Hu , Xiongwen Lu
{"title":"当奥密克戎敲门时:病毒接近度和亲社会行为之间的倒U型关系","authors":"Cheng Zhang ,&nbsp;Lixian Qian ,&nbsp;Wen Yu ,&nbsp;Jian-Qiang Hu ,&nbsp;Xiongwen Lu","doi":"10.1016/j.fmre.2023.07.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The literature suggests inconsistent evidence regarding the influence of danger on prosocial behavior. We explore this issue through a nationwide survey of 8567 households in China during the COVID-19 Omicron variant outbreak in 2022. In a zero-COVID policy, China chose to quarantine all neighborhoods with viral infections. The almost random presence of infected cases provides an opportunity to examine the relationship between the proximity of danger (i.e. potential Omicron infection) and the prosocial behavior of residents in quarantine zones. For the first time, we find an inverted U-shape relationship: residents exhibit a stronger prosocial behavior when living closer to infected cases in the neighborhood, but this positive effect diminishes when they are too close to each other. Furthermore, such non-linear relationship is salient in residents’ interpersonal helping but not in their cooperative behavior. Policymakers should be mindful of the different prosocial responses and target their efforts to help communities navigate quarantine periods more effectively.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34602,"journal":{"name":"Fundamental Research","volume":"5 3","pages":"Pages 1233-1245"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When Omicron knocks at door: An inverted U-shape relationship between virus proximity and prosocial behavior\",\"authors\":\"Cheng Zhang ,&nbsp;Lixian Qian ,&nbsp;Wen Yu ,&nbsp;Jian-Qiang Hu ,&nbsp;Xiongwen Lu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fmre.2023.07.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The literature suggests inconsistent evidence regarding the influence of danger on prosocial behavior. We explore this issue through a nationwide survey of 8567 households in China during the COVID-19 Omicron variant outbreak in 2022. In a zero-COVID policy, China chose to quarantine all neighborhoods with viral infections. The almost random presence of infected cases provides an opportunity to examine the relationship between the proximity of danger (i.e. potential Omicron infection) and the prosocial behavior of residents in quarantine zones. For the first time, we find an inverted U-shape relationship: residents exhibit a stronger prosocial behavior when living closer to infected cases in the neighborhood, but this positive effect diminishes when they are too close to each other. Furthermore, such non-linear relationship is salient in residents’ interpersonal helping but not in their cooperative behavior. Policymakers should be mindful of the different prosocial responses and target their efforts to help communities navigate quarantine periods more effectively.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34602,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fundamental Research\",\"volume\":\"5 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1233-1245\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fundamental Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667325823002200\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Multidisciplinary\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fundamental Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667325823002200","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Multidisciplinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于危险对亲社会行为的影响,文献表明证据不一致。我们通过在2022年COVID-19欧米克隆变异爆发期间对中国8567户家庭的全国调查来探讨这一问题。在零冠政策下,中国选择隔离所有有病毒感染的社区。几乎随机出现的感染病例为检查危险(即潜在的欧米克隆感染)的接近程度与隔离区居民的亲社会行为之间的关系提供了机会。我们首次发现了倒u型关系:当居民居住在离感染者较近的社区时,他们表现出更强的亲社会行为,但当他们彼此太近时,这种积极影响会减弱。此外,这种非线性关系在居民的人际帮助行为中表现突出,而在合作行为中表现不明显。政策制定者应该注意不同的亲社会反应,并有针对性地帮助社区更有效地度过隔离期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
When Omicron knocks at door: An inverted U-shape relationship between virus proximity and prosocial behavior
The literature suggests inconsistent evidence regarding the influence of danger on prosocial behavior. We explore this issue through a nationwide survey of 8567 households in China during the COVID-19 Omicron variant outbreak in 2022. In a zero-COVID policy, China chose to quarantine all neighborhoods with viral infections. The almost random presence of infected cases provides an opportunity to examine the relationship between the proximity of danger (i.e. potential Omicron infection) and the prosocial behavior of residents in quarantine zones. For the first time, we find an inverted U-shape relationship: residents exhibit a stronger prosocial behavior when living closer to infected cases in the neighborhood, but this positive effect diminishes when they are too close to each other. Furthermore, such non-linear relationship is salient in residents’ interpersonal helping but not in their cooperative behavior. Policymakers should be mindful of the different prosocial responses and target their efforts to help communities navigate quarantine periods more effectively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Fundamental Research
Fundamental Research Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
1.60%
发文量
294
审稿时长
79 days
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信