犹太教育中的“它”

IF 0.2 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Sivan Zakai
{"title":"犹太教育中的“它”","authors":"Sivan Zakai","doi":"10.4324/9781315128207-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In his landmark essay titled “I, Thou, and It,” David Hawkins (1974/2002) argues that at the heart of education lies relationships between and among teachers, students, and subject matter. Explaining the import of Hawkins’ conceptualization, Miriam Raider-Roth (2017) writes, “Each dyad in this triangle is informed and shaped by the other dyads. The third learning partner of the ‘it’ is what distinguishes this relational dynamic from other types of relationships” (p. 3). Teaching and learning, in this view, rest not only on interactions among teachers and students, but also stand in relationship with rich content. Each of the essays in this issue of the Journal of Jewish Education raises up the importance of some form of “it” in Jewish education. As a collective, they spotlight a range of content-rich materials: anthologies written for use in the Israeli ultra-Orthodox classroom, materials created for the study of Biblical Hebrew in English-speaking communities, and Jewish books written for the American Jewish family and home. Although these articles differently frame the “work” of Jewish education, are situated in different educational milieu, and rest on distinct beliefs about how students and teachers might relate to and learn from content, all explicitly highlight one form of Hawkins’ “it.” In the first article in this issue, Oshri Zighelboim examines how education anthologies used in ultra-Orthodox Israeli schools frame the concept of a chosen people. The title of Zighelboim's work, “You Have Chosen Us from Among all Nations,” draws from Natan Alterman's 1942 poem “Of All the Peoples” (Alterman, 1942/2018). Yet while Alterman's poetry conveys a deep discomfort with Jewish exceptionalism, Zighelboim's work demonstrates the positive valence of the concept of chosenness in ultra-Orthodox educational anthologies. By examining educational resources primarily aimed at a 6th grade audience, Zighelboim captures how ultra-Orthodox anthologies frame religious, ethnic, and territorial separatism, and she illuminates how this framing is both distinct from and related to the ways that the concept of chosenness appears in educational materials of Israeli state and state-religious schools as well. Turning from materials that teach about the idea of chosenness to materials that teach Biblical Hebrew, the second article in this issue, “A Pedagogical Approach to Teaching Biblical Hebrew in American Day “Schools” presents Ziva Hassenfeld's system for teaching students to read, understand, and interpret Biblical text. While Zighelboim offers colorful descriptions of ultraOrthodox Jewish education in Israel, Hassenfeld's materials for the teaching of JOURNAL OF JEWISH EDUCATION 2022, VOL. 88, NO. 4, 259–260 https://doi.org/10.1080/15244113.2022.2153550","PeriodicalId":42565,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Jewish Education","volume":"88 1","pages":"259 - 260"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The “It” in Jewish Education\",\"authors\":\"Sivan Zakai\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9781315128207-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In his landmark essay titled “I, Thou, and It,” David Hawkins (1974/2002) argues that at the heart of education lies relationships between and among teachers, students, and subject matter. Explaining the import of Hawkins’ conceptualization, Miriam Raider-Roth (2017) writes, “Each dyad in this triangle is informed and shaped by the other dyads. The third learning partner of the ‘it’ is what distinguishes this relational dynamic from other types of relationships” (p. 3). Teaching and learning, in this view, rest not only on interactions among teachers and students, but also stand in relationship with rich content. Each of the essays in this issue of the Journal of Jewish Education raises up the importance of some form of “it” in Jewish education. As a collective, they spotlight a range of content-rich materials: anthologies written for use in the Israeli ultra-Orthodox classroom, materials created for the study of Biblical Hebrew in English-speaking communities, and Jewish books written for the American Jewish family and home. Although these articles differently frame the “work” of Jewish education, are situated in different educational milieu, and rest on distinct beliefs about how students and teachers might relate to and learn from content, all explicitly highlight one form of Hawkins’ “it.” In the first article in this issue, Oshri Zighelboim examines how education anthologies used in ultra-Orthodox Israeli schools frame the concept of a chosen people. The title of Zighelboim's work, “You Have Chosen Us from Among all Nations,” draws from Natan Alterman's 1942 poem “Of All the Peoples” (Alterman, 1942/2018). Yet while Alterman's poetry conveys a deep discomfort with Jewish exceptionalism, Zighelboim's work demonstrates the positive valence of the concept of chosenness in ultra-Orthodox educational anthologies. By examining educational resources primarily aimed at a 6th grade audience, Zighelboim captures how ultra-Orthodox anthologies frame religious, ethnic, and territorial separatism, and she illuminates how this framing is both distinct from and related to the ways that the concept of chosenness appears in educational materials of Israeli state and state-religious schools as well. Turning from materials that teach about the idea of chosenness to materials that teach Biblical Hebrew, the second article in this issue, “A Pedagogical Approach to Teaching Biblical Hebrew in American Day “Schools” presents Ziva Hassenfeld's system for teaching students to read, understand, and interpret Biblical text. While Zighelboim offers colorful descriptions of ultraOrthodox Jewish education in Israel, Hassenfeld's materials for the teaching of JOURNAL OF JEWISH EDUCATION 2022, VOL. 88, NO. 4, 259–260 https://doi.org/10.1080/15244113.2022.2153550\",\"PeriodicalId\":42565,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Jewish Education\",\"volume\":\"88 1\",\"pages\":\"259 - 260\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Jewish Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315128207-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Jewish Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315128207-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大卫·霍金斯(David Hawkins, 1974/2002)在其里程碑式的论文《我、你和它》(I, Thou and It)中指出,教育的核心在于教师、学生和主题之间的关系。Miriam Raider-Roth(2017)在解释霍金斯概念化的重要性时写道:“这个三角形中的每一个二对都是由其他二对告知和塑造的。“它”的第三个学习伙伴是将这种关系动态与其他类型的关系区分开来的东西”(第3页)。在这种观点中,教与学不仅依赖于教师和学生之间的互动,而且还与丰富的内容建立关系。本期《犹太教育杂志》的每篇文章都提出了某种形式的“它”在犹太教育中的重要性。作为一个集体,他们关注了一系列内容丰富的材料:为以色列极端正统派课堂编写的选集,为英语社区研究圣经希伯来语而编写的材料,以及为美国犹太家庭和家庭编写的犹太书籍。尽管这些文章对犹太教育的“工作”有不同的定义,它们处于不同的教育环境中,并且基于不同的信念,即学生和教师如何与内容联系并从内容中学习,但它们都明确地强调了霍金斯“它”的一种形式。在本期的第一篇文章中,Oshri Zighelboim研究了极端正统的以色列学校中使用的教育选集是如何构建选民概念的。齐格博伊姆作品的标题是《你从所有国家中选择了我们》,取自纳坦·奥特曼1942年的诗歌《所有民族》(奥特曼,1942/2018)。然而,当奥特曼的诗歌表达了对犹太人例外论的深深的不适时,齐格伯伊姆的作品展示了极端正统教育选集中选择概念的积极价值。通过研究主要针对六年级学生的教育资源,Zighelboim捕捉到了极端正统派选集是如何构建宗教、种族和领土分离主义的,她阐明了这种框架是如何与以色列国家和国家宗教学校的教育材料中出现的选择概念既不同又相关的。本期第二篇文章《在美国日学校中教授圣经希伯来语的教学方法》介绍了Ziva Hassenfeld教授学生阅读、理解和解释圣经文本的方法。虽然齐格博伊姆对以色列极端正统的犹太教育进行了丰富多彩的描述,但哈森菲尔德的教学材料《犹太教育杂志2022》(JOURNAL of Jewish education 2022)第88卷第1期。4,259 - 260 https://doi.org/10.1080/15244113.2022.2153550
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The “It” in Jewish Education
In his landmark essay titled “I, Thou, and It,” David Hawkins (1974/2002) argues that at the heart of education lies relationships between and among teachers, students, and subject matter. Explaining the import of Hawkins’ conceptualization, Miriam Raider-Roth (2017) writes, “Each dyad in this triangle is informed and shaped by the other dyads. The third learning partner of the ‘it’ is what distinguishes this relational dynamic from other types of relationships” (p. 3). Teaching and learning, in this view, rest not only on interactions among teachers and students, but also stand in relationship with rich content. Each of the essays in this issue of the Journal of Jewish Education raises up the importance of some form of “it” in Jewish education. As a collective, they spotlight a range of content-rich materials: anthologies written for use in the Israeli ultra-Orthodox classroom, materials created for the study of Biblical Hebrew in English-speaking communities, and Jewish books written for the American Jewish family and home. Although these articles differently frame the “work” of Jewish education, are situated in different educational milieu, and rest on distinct beliefs about how students and teachers might relate to and learn from content, all explicitly highlight one form of Hawkins’ “it.” In the first article in this issue, Oshri Zighelboim examines how education anthologies used in ultra-Orthodox Israeli schools frame the concept of a chosen people. The title of Zighelboim's work, “You Have Chosen Us from Among all Nations,” draws from Natan Alterman's 1942 poem “Of All the Peoples” (Alterman, 1942/2018). Yet while Alterman's poetry conveys a deep discomfort with Jewish exceptionalism, Zighelboim's work demonstrates the positive valence of the concept of chosenness in ultra-Orthodox educational anthologies. By examining educational resources primarily aimed at a 6th grade audience, Zighelboim captures how ultra-Orthodox anthologies frame religious, ethnic, and territorial separatism, and she illuminates how this framing is both distinct from and related to the ways that the concept of chosenness appears in educational materials of Israeli state and state-religious schools as well. Turning from materials that teach about the idea of chosenness to materials that teach Biblical Hebrew, the second article in this issue, “A Pedagogical Approach to Teaching Biblical Hebrew in American Day “Schools” presents Ziva Hassenfeld's system for teaching students to read, understand, and interpret Biblical text. While Zighelboim offers colorful descriptions of ultraOrthodox Jewish education in Israel, Hassenfeld's materials for the teaching of JOURNAL OF JEWISH EDUCATION 2022, VOL. 88, NO. 4, 259–260 https://doi.org/10.1080/15244113.2022.2153550
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Jewish Education
Journal of Jewish Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
75.00%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信