水溶液中稀土元素提取方法的多准则评价

IF 3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
A. Sadeghi, S. T. Kermani Alghorayshi, M. Shamsi, F. Mirjani
{"title":"水溶液中稀土元素提取方法的多准则评价","authors":"A. Sadeghi,&nbsp;S. T. Kermani Alghorayshi,&nbsp;M. Shamsi,&nbsp;F. Mirjani","doi":"10.1007/s13762-023-05081-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study aims to evaluate the extraction methods of rare earth elements (REEs) from aqueous solution streams using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method. However, their extraction from aqueous solutions is challenging due to their low concentration and complex chemical properties. The AHP method is a multi-criteria decision-making tool that allows for the prioritization of different criteria based on their relative importance. In this study, eight extraction methods were evaluated based on three criteria: economic justification, technical justification, and environmental justification. The eight methods included adsorption, biosorption, chemical precipitation, electrocoagulation, ion flotation, ion exchange, membrane filtration, and solvent extraction. The results showed that flotation was the most efficient method for REE extraction, with a score of 0.176, followed by adsorption, with a score of 0.149. Biosorption and solvent extraction had lower scores of 0.147 and 0.136, respectively. Besides, another AHP was conducted to prioritize the three surfactant categories used in the ion flotation process based on seven criteria: capacity, cost, efficiency, recovery duration, repeatability, scalability, and selectivity. The three surfactant categories included bio-based, chemo-based, and nano-based surfactants. The results indicate that nano-surfactants were the most suitable surfactants for REE extraction by ion flotation with a score of 0.465, followed by chemo-surfactants with a score of 0.390. Overall, this study provides valuable insights into evaluating different REE extraction methods using the AHP methodology. The findings can help researchers and industry professionals decide on selecting appropriate REE extraction methods based on their specific needs and priorities.</p><h3>Graphical abstract</h3>\n <figure><div><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></div></figure>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":589,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology","volume":"20 9","pages":"9707 - 9716"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13762-023-05081-7.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multi-criteria evaluation of the extraction methods of rare earth elements from aqueous streams\",\"authors\":\"A. Sadeghi,&nbsp;S. T. Kermani Alghorayshi,&nbsp;M. Shamsi,&nbsp;F. Mirjani\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13762-023-05081-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study aims to evaluate the extraction methods of rare earth elements (REEs) from aqueous solution streams using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method. However, their extraction from aqueous solutions is challenging due to their low concentration and complex chemical properties. The AHP method is a multi-criteria decision-making tool that allows for the prioritization of different criteria based on their relative importance. In this study, eight extraction methods were evaluated based on three criteria: economic justification, technical justification, and environmental justification. The eight methods included adsorption, biosorption, chemical precipitation, electrocoagulation, ion flotation, ion exchange, membrane filtration, and solvent extraction. The results showed that flotation was the most efficient method for REE extraction, with a score of 0.176, followed by adsorption, with a score of 0.149. Biosorption and solvent extraction had lower scores of 0.147 and 0.136, respectively. Besides, another AHP was conducted to prioritize the three surfactant categories used in the ion flotation process based on seven criteria: capacity, cost, efficiency, recovery duration, repeatability, scalability, and selectivity. The three surfactant categories included bio-based, chemo-based, and nano-based surfactants. The results indicate that nano-surfactants were the most suitable surfactants for REE extraction by ion flotation with a score of 0.465, followed by chemo-surfactants with a score of 0.390. Overall, this study provides valuable insights into evaluating different REE extraction methods using the AHP methodology. The findings can help researchers and industry professionals decide on selecting appropriate REE extraction methods based on their specific needs and priorities.</p><h3>Graphical abstract</h3>\\n <figure><div><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></div></figure>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":589,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\"20 9\",\"pages\":\"9707 - 9716\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13762-023-05081-7.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13762-023-05081-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13762-023-05081-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在利用层次分析法(AHP)对水溶液中稀土元素的提取方法进行评价。然而,由于其低浓度和复杂的化学性质,从水溶液中提取它们是具有挑战性的。AHP方法是一种多标准决策工具,允许根据不同标准的相对重要性对其进行优先级排序。在本研究中,基于三个标准对八种提取方法进行了评估:经济合理性、技术合理性和环境合理性。8种方法包括吸附法、生物吸附法、化学沉淀法、电絮凝法、离子浮选法、离子交换法、膜过滤法和溶剂萃取法。结果表明:浮选法提取稀土的效率最高,得分为0.176;吸附法次之,得分为0.149;生物吸附法和溶剂萃取法得分较低,分别为0.147和0.136。此外,根据容量、成本、效率、回收时间、可重复性、可扩展性和选择性7个标准,对离子浮选过程中使用的三种表面活性剂进行了层次分析法排序。三种表面活性剂包括生物基、化学基和纳米基表面活性剂。结果表明,纳米表面活性剂是离子浮选提取稀土元素的最佳表面活性剂,得分为0.465,其次是化学表面活性剂,得分为0.390。总的来说,本研究为使用AHP方法评价不同的稀土元素提取方法提供了有价值的见解。研究结果可以帮助研究人员和行业专业人员根据他们的具体需求和优先级选择合适的稀土提取方法。图形抽象
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multi-criteria evaluation of the extraction methods of rare earth elements from aqueous streams

This study aims to evaluate the extraction methods of rare earth elements (REEs) from aqueous solution streams using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method. However, their extraction from aqueous solutions is challenging due to their low concentration and complex chemical properties. The AHP method is a multi-criteria decision-making tool that allows for the prioritization of different criteria based on their relative importance. In this study, eight extraction methods were evaluated based on three criteria: economic justification, technical justification, and environmental justification. The eight methods included adsorption, biosorption, chemical precipitation, electrocoagulation, ion flotation, ion exchange, membrane filtration, and solvent extraction. The results showed that flotation was the most efficient method for REE extraction, with a score of 0.176, followed by adsorption, with a score of 0.149. Biosorption and solvent extraction had lower scores of 0.147 and 0.136, respectively. Besides, another AHP was conducted to prioritize the three surfactant categories used in the ion flotation process based on seven criteria: capacity, cost, efficiency, recovery duration, repeatability, scalability, and selectivity. The three surfactant categories included bio-based, chemo-based, and nano-based surfactants. The results indicate that nano-surfactants were the most suitable surfactants for REE extraction by ion flotation with a score of 0.465, followed by chemo-surfactants with a score of 0.390. Overall, this study provides valuable insights into evaluating different REE extraction methods using the AHP methodology. The findings can help researchers and industry professionals decide on selecting appropriate REE extraction methods based on their specific needs and priorities.

Graphical abstract

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.50%
发文量
806
审稿时长
10.8 months
期刊介绍: International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology (IJEST) is an international scholarly refereed research journal which aims to promote the theory and practice of environmental science and technology, innovation, engineering and management. A broad outline of the journal''s scope includes: peer reviewed original research articles, case and technical reports, reviews and analyses papers, short communications and notes to the editor, in interdisciplinary information on the practice and status of research in environmental science and technology, both natural and man made. The main aspects of research areas include, but are not exclusive to; environmental chemistry and biology, environments pollution control and abatement technology, transport and fate of pollutants in the environment, concentrations and dispersion of wastes in air, water, and soil, point and non-point sources pollution, heavy metals and organic compounds in the environment, atmospheric pollutants and trace gases, solid and hazardous waste management; soil biodegradation and bioremediation of contaminated sites; environmental impact assessment, industrial ecology, ecological and human risk assessment; improved energy management and auditing efficiency and environmental standards and criteria.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信