大学生生态系统失衡的功能与因果推理

Q4 Arts and Humanities
Claudia Patricia Navarro-Roldán, Joan Gil-Contreras, Iván Pinzón-Prieto
{"title":"大学生生态系统失衡的功能与因果推理","authors":"Claudia Patricia Navarro-Roldán, Joan Gil-Contreras, Iván Pinzón-Prieto","doi":"10.17081/eduhum.22.39.4081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: this paper describes how university students argue functionally and causally about an ecosystem, using the Structure, Behavior and Function models. Method: a descriptive transversal design has been used with a mixed model of concurrent triangulation. Simultaneously, qualitative and quantitative data have been gathered and analyzed in order to compare and integrate them. From intentional sampling with college students (n=60), four groups have been formed: biology students, and natural sciences and environmental education students. They have been divided into four equal groups according to their studies and to the condition of having completed or not during year 2018 the two mandatory subjects related to ecology. They answered interview questions about ecosystems and resolved a situation problem raised in a bioterium affected by anthropogenic activities and contaminating residues. Results: we found differences attributable to the level of expertise between biology students that studied ecology, who understood the ecosystem from the dynamic interdependence of structure and functions, and other groups, who emphasized structural components with greater perceptual salience. Conclusions and discussion: although most students understand the causal and functional relationships of the ecosystem, there are some biases in the conceptual construction, which can be explained from the incorrect recognition of the cause and the establishment of causal relationships.","PeriodicalId":30507,"journal":{"name":"Educacion y Humanismo","volume":"22 1","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Razonamiento funcional y causal sobre el desequilibrio ecosistémico en estudiantes universitarios\",\"authors\":\"Claudia Patricia Navarro-Roldán, Joan Gil-Contreras, Iván Pinzón-Prieto\",\"doi\":\"10.17081/eduhum.22.39.4081\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: this paper describes how university students argue functionally and causally about an ecosystem, using the Structure, Behavior and Function models. Method: a descriptive transversal design has been used with a mixed model of concurrent triangulation. Simultaneously, qualitative and quantitative data have been gathered and analyzed in order to compare and integrate them. From intentional sampling with college students (n=60), four groups have been formed: biology students, and natural sciences and environmental education students. They have been divided into four equal groups according to their studies and to the condition of having completed or not during year 2018 the two mandatory subjects related to ecology. They answered interview questions about ecosystems and resolved a situation problem raised in a bioterium affected by anthropogenic activities and contaminating residues. Results: we found differences attributable to the level of expertise between biology students that studied ecology, who understood the ecosystem from the dynamic interdependence of structure and functions, and other groups, who emphasized structural components with greater perceptual salience. Conclusions and discussion: although most students understand the causal and functional relationships of the ecosystem, there are some biases in the conceptual construction, which can be explained from the incorrect recognition of the cause and the establishment of causal relationships.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30507,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Educacion y Humanismo\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"1-22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Educacion y Humanismo\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17081/eduhum.22.39.4081\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educacion y Humanismo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17081/eduhum.22.39.4081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:本文描述了大学生如何使用结构、行为和功能模型对生态系统进行功能和因果性的争论。方法:采用并行三角剖分混合模型进行描述性横向设计。同时,对定性和定量数据进行了收集和分析,以便对它们进行比较和整合。从有意抽样的大学生(n=60)中,形成了四组:生物学学生和自然科学与环境教育学生。根据他们的学习情况和在2018年完成或未完成两门与生态有关的必修科目的情况,将他们分为四个平等组。他们回答了有关生态系统的采访问题,并解决了在受人为活动和污染残留物影响的生物群中出现的情况问题。结果:我们发现生物学专业的学生之间存在差异,他们从结构和功能的动态相互依赖中理解生态系统,而其他组则强调具有更大感知显著性的结构成分。结论与讨论:虽然大多数学生理解生态系统的因果关系和功能关系,但在概念建构上存在一些偏差,这可以从错误地认识原因和建立因果关系来解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Razonamiento funcional y causal sobre el desequilibrio ecosistémico en estudiantes universitarios
Objective: this paper describes how university students argue functionally and causally about an ecosystem, using the Structure, Behavior and Function models. Method: a descriptive transversal design has been used with a mixed model of concurrent triangulation. Simultaneously, qualitative and quantitative data have been gathered and analyzed in order to compare and integrate them. From intentional sampling with college students (n=60), four groups have been formed: biology students, and natural sciences and environmental education students. They have been divided into four equal groups according to their studies and to the condition of having completed or not during year 2018 the two mandatory subjects related to ecology. They answered interview questions about ecosystems and resolved a situation problem raised in a bioterium affected by anthropogenic activities and contaminating residues. Results: we found differences attributable to the level of expertise between biology students that studied ecology, who understood the ecosystem from the dynamic interdependence of structure and functions, and other groups, who emphasized structural components with greater perceptual salience. Conclusions and discussion: although most students understand the causal and functional relationships of the ecosystem, there are some biases in the conceptual construction, which can be explained from the incorrect recognition of the cause and the establishment of causal relationships.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信