{"title":"他汀类药物非日常给药的疗效和耐受性:文献系统综述","authors":"Cindy Park, Q. Le","doi":"10.37901/jcphp18-00003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose Current issues regarding biosimilar drug use are reviewed in a two-part article from the perspective of pharmacy practice. Background Statins are known to be safe, but some patients discontinue the therapy due to adverse effects. Given the clinical benefits of statin therapy, it is important to find different strategies to maintain its use. The aims of this systematic review were to summarize and critically appraise evidence of the efficacy, tolerability, and economic evaluation of non-daily statin administration in the past ten years. Methods Literature was searched through Cochrane, Embase, PubMed and Web of Science using relevant search terms. Studies of any size and design published between January 2007 and August 2017 were considered for the assessment of efficacy and tolerability. For economic evaluation, the search was repeated without restriction to the publication year to identify more relevant articles. Results All eleven studies, of which three were randomized controlled trials, supported the use of intermittent statin regimens to lower low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels in patients with dyslipidemia. Most of the studies reported high tolerability to intermittent statin therapy, ranging from 72.5% to 100%. Economic analysis of four articles showed that the intermittent regimen is cost-saving in terms of cost per 1% LDL reduction. Our systematic review of current evidence suggests that patients with dyslipidemia may reduce their LDL levels with intermittent statin administration. Non-daily administration has other benefits of improved tolerability and lower cost when compared to daily administration.","PeriodicalId":15502,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Pharmacy Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and Tolerability of non-daily Statin Administration: A Systematic Review of Literature\",\"authors\":\"Cindy Park, Q. Le\",\"doi\":\"10.37901/jcphp18-00003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose Current issues regarding biosimilar drug use are reviewed in a two-part article from the perspective of pharmacy practice. Background Statins are known to be safe, but some patients discontinue the therapy due to adverse effects. Given the clinical benefits of statin therapy, it is important to find different strategies to maintain its use. The aims of this systematic review were to summarize and critically appraise evidence of the efficacy, tolerability, and economic evaluation of non-daily statin administration in the past ten years. Methods Literature was searched through Cochrane, Embase, PubMed and Web of Science using relevant search terms. Studies of any size and design published between January 2007 and August 2017 were considered for the assessment of efficacy and tolerability. For economic evaluation, the search was repeated without restriction to the publication year to identify more relevant articles. Results All eleven studies, of which three were randomized controlled trials, supported the use of intermittent statin regimens to lower low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels in patients with dyslipidemia. Most of the studies reported high tolerability to intermittent statin therapy, ranging from 72.5% to 100%. Economic analysis of four articles showed that the intermittent regimen is cost-saving in terms of cost per 1% LDL reduction. Our systematic review of current evidence suggests that patients with dyslipidemia may reduce their LDL levels with intermittent statin administration. Non-daily administration has other benefits of improved tolerability and lower cost when compared to daily administration.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15502,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Contemporary Pharmacy Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Contemporary Pharmacy Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37901/jcphp18-00003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Pharmacy Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37901/jcphp18-00003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的从药学实践的角度,分两部分综述了目前有关生物类似药使用的问题。他汀类药物是安全的,但一些患者由于不良反应而停止治疗。鉴于他汀类药物治疗的临床益处,寻找不同的策略来维持其使用是很重要的。本系统综述的目的是总结和批判性评价过去十年非每日他汀类药物给药的疗效、耐受性和经济评价的证据。方法采用相关检索词,通过Cochrane、Embase、PubMed和Web of Science进行文献检索。在2007年1月至2017年8月期间发表的任何规模和设计的研究都被考虑用于评估疗效和耐受性。为了进行经济评价,重复检索,不受出版年份的限制,以确定更多相关的文章。结果所有11项研究(其中3项为随机对照试验)均支持使用间歇性他汀类药物降低血脂异常患者的低密度脂蛋白水平。大多数研究报告了间歇性他汀类药物治疗的高耐受性,范围从72.5%到100%。对四篇文章的经济分析表明,以每降低1% LDL的成本计算,间歇治疗方案节省了成本。我们对现有证据的系统回顾表明,间歇性服用他汀类药物可降低血脂异常患者的LDL水平。与每日给药相比,非每日给药具有提高耐受性和降低成本的其他好处。
Efficacy and Tolerability of non-daily Statin Administration: A Systematic Review of Literature
Purpose Current issues regarding biosimilar drug use are reviewed in a two-part article from the perspective of pharmacy practice. Background Statins are known to be safe, but some patients discontinue the therapy due to adverse effects. Given the clinical benefits of statin therapy, it is important to find different strategies to maintain its use. The aims of this systematic review were to summarize and critically appraise evidence of the efficacy, tolerability, and economic evaluation of non-daily statin administration in the past ten years. Methods Literature was searched through Cochrane, Embase, PubMed and Web of Science using relevant search terms. Studies of any size and design published between January 2007 and August 2017 were considered for the assessment of efficacy and tolerability. For economic evaluation, the search was repeated without restriction to the publication year to identify more relevant articles. Results All eleven studies, of which three were randomized controlled trials, supported the use of intermittent statin regimens to lower low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels in patients with dyslipidemia. Most of the studies reported high tolerability to intermittent statin therapy, ranging from 72.5% to 100%. Economic analysis of four articles showed that the intermittent regimen is cost-saving in terms of cost per 1% LDL reduction. Our systematic review of current evidence suggests that patients with dyslipidemia may reduce their LDL levels with intermittent statin administration. Non-daily administration has other benefits of improved tolerability and lower cost when compared to daily administration.