数学实践课程

IF 1.9 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Peter Grootenboer, Christine Edwards-Groves, S. Kemmis
{"title":"数学实践课程","authors":"Peter Grootenboer, Christine Edwards-Groves, S. Kemmis","doi":"10.1080/14681366.2021.1937678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper argues for reconceptualising an educational curriculum that locates its primacy in practices. The argument is framed around the core purpose of education: to help people ‘live well in a world worth living in’. Living well and learning about what this means is typically guided by epistemologically based curricula, and conversely, school curricula determine the substance of education. We argue that this understanding of education is too narrow, and as a consequence, it severs the relationship between knowing and practising. We propose that a curriculum of mathematical practices is required for human flourishing, where the focus is on mathematical practices rather than predominantly on knowledge. To demonstrate our position, we consider different kinds of mathematical practices needed during the Covid-19 crisis. We examine how a practice-approach forms the basis for a future-oriented curriculum which might better equip individuals and societies to respond to conditions which disrupt their everyday circumstances.","PeriodicalId":46617,"journal":{"name":"Pedagogy Culture and Society","volume":"31 1","pages":"607 - 625"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14681366.2021.1937678","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A curriculum of mathematical practices\",\"authors\":\"Peter Grootenboer, Christine Edwards-Groves, S. Kemmis\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14681366.2021.1937678\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This paper argues for reconceptualising an educational curriculum that locates its primacy in practices. The argument is framed around the core purpose of education: to help people ‘live well in a world worth living in’. Living well and learning about what this means is typically guided by epistemologically based curricula, and conversely, school curricula determine the substance of education. We argue that this understanding of education is too narrow, and as a consequence, it severs the relationship between knowing and practising. We propose that a curriculum of mathematical practices is required for human flourishing, where the focus is on mathematical practices rather than predominantly on knowledge. To demonstrate our position, we consider different kinds of mathematical practices needed during the Covid-19 crisis. We examine how a practice-approach forms the basis for a future-oriented curriculum which might better equip individuals and societies to respond to conditions which disrupt their everyday circumstances.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46617,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pedagogy Culture and Society\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"607 - 625\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14681366.2021.1937678\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pedagogy Culture and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2021.1937678\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pedagogy Culture and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2021.1937678","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

本文主张重新定义教育课程,将其定位在实践中的首要地位。这一论点围绕着教育的核心目的展开:帮助人们“在一个值得生活的世界里生活得更好”。生活得好并了解这意味着什么通常是由基于认识论的课程指导的,相反,学校课程决定了教育的实质。我们认为,这种对教育的理解过于狭隘,因此,它切断了知识和实践之间的关系。我们建议,数学实践课程是人类繁荣所必需的,重点是数学实践,而不是主要是知识。为了证明我们的立场,我们考虑了Covid-19危机期间需要的不同类型的数学实践。我们研究了实践方法如何形成面向未来的课程的基础,这可能会更好地装备个人和社会来应对扰乱他们日常环境的条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A curriculum of mathematical practices
ABSTRACT This paper argues for reconceptualising an educational curriculum that locates its primacy in practices. The argument is framed around the core purpose of education: to help people ‘live well in a world worth living in’. Living well and learning about what this means is typically guided by epistemologically based curricula, and conversely, school curricula determine the substance of education. We argue that this understanding of education is too narrow, and as a consequence, it severs the relationship between knowing and practising. We propose that a curriculum of mathematical practices is required for human flourishing, where the focus is on mathematical practices rather than predominantly on knowledge. To demonstrate our position, we consider different kinds of mathematical practices needed during the Covid-19 crisis. We examine how a practice-approach forms the basis for a future-oriented curriculum which might better equip individuals and societies to respond to conditions which disrupt their everyday circumstances.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pedagogy Culture and Society
Pedagogy Culture and Society EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Pedagogy, Culture & Society is a fully-refereed international journal that seeks to provide an international forum for pedagogy discussion and debate. The identity of the journal is built on the belief that pedagogy debate has the following features: •Pedagogy debate is not restricted by geographical boundaries: its participants are the international educational community and its proceedings appeal to a worldwide audience. •Pedagogy debate is open and democratic: it is not the preserve of teachers, politicians, academics or administrators but requires open discussion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信