{"title":"言语能力与言语表现","authors":"Peijian Paul Sun, Lawrence Jun Zhang","doi":"10.1075/jsls.22002.jun","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This study examined Chinese-as-a-second-language (L2 Chinese) learners’ speech production ability from a dual\n perspective: speech competence and speech performance. A total of 118 valid L2 Chinese learners finished two developed tests in\n this study, namely, the Chinese speech competence test and the Chinese speech performance test. The results suggested that L2\n Chinese learners’ speech competence and speech performance, as a twofold rendering of their L2 speech production ability, not only\n showed a significant positive correlation with a large effect size (Pearson’s r = .598) but also significantly\n predicted each other with a large effect size (Cohen f2\n = .555). However, such large effect sizes of\n the correlation and the prediction between speech competence and speech performance were not supported among the\n upper-intermediate L2 Chinese learners. This suggested that the development between speech competence and speech performance may\n be more unbalanced among the upper-intermediate L2 Chinese learners compared with their advanced counterparts. The study adds\n evidence to the call for a multidimensional evaluation of L2 speech production ability. It is hoped that the dual approach (i.e.,\n speech competence and speech performance) proposed in the present study may contribute to a more comprehensive evaluation of\n learners’ L2 Chinese speech production ability. Consequently, classroom-based teaching can be tailored to facilitate a more\n balanced development of L2 Chinese learners’ speech competence and speech performance.","PeriodicalId":29903,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Second Language Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Speech competence and speech performance\",\"authors\":\"Peijian Paul Sun, Lawrence Jun Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/jsls.22002.jun\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This study examined Chinese-as-a-second-language (L2 Chinese) learners’ speech production ability from a dual\\n perspective: speech competence and speech performance. A total of 118 valid L2 Chinese learners finished two developed tests in\\n this study, namely, the Chinese speech competence test and the Chinese speech performance test. The results suggested that L2\\n Chinese learners’ speech competence and speech performance, as a twofold rendering of their L2 speech production ability, not only\\n showed a significant positive correlation with a large effect size (Pearson’s r = .598) but also significantly\\n predicted each other with a large effect size (Cohen f2\\n = .555). However, such large effect sizes of\\n the correlation and the prediction between speech competence and speech performance were not supported among the\\n upper-intermediate L2 Chinese learners. This suggested that the development between speech competence and speech performance may\\n be more unbalanced among the upper-intermediate L2 Chinese learners compared with their advanced counterparts. The study adds\\n evidence to the call for a multidimensional evaluation of L2 speech production ability. It is hoped that the dual approach (i.e.,\\n speech competence and speech performance) proposed in the present study may contribute to a more comprehensive evaluation of\\n learners’ L2 Chinese speech production ability. Consequently, classroom-based teaching can be tailored to facilitate a more\\n balanced development of L2 Chinese learners’ speech competence and speech performance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":29903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Second Language Studies\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Second Language Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.22002.jun\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Second Language Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.22002.jun","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
本研究从言语能力和言语表现两方面考察了汉语作为第二语言学习者的言语产生能力。118名有效的二语汉语学习者完成了本研究开发的两项测试,即汉语言语能力测试和汉语言语表现测试。结果表明,汉语二语学习者的言语能力和言语表现作为其二语言语产生能力的双重呈现,不仅与大效应量呈显著正相关(Pearson’s r = .598),而且在大效应量下相互显著预测(Cohen’s f2 = .555)。然而,在中上二汉语学习者中,言语能力与言语表现之间的相关性和预测并不支持如此大的效应量。这表明中高水平汉语二语学习者的言语能力和言语表现的发展可能比中高水平汉语二语学习者更不平衡。该研究为对第二语言产生能力进行多维评估的呼吁提供了证据。希望本研究提出的言语能力和言语表现的双重评价方法能够更全面地评价学习者的二语汉语言语产生能力。因此,课堂教学可以量身定制,以促进第二语言汉语学习者的语言能力和语言表现的更平衡的发展。
This study examined Chinese-as-a-second-language (L2 Chinese) learners’ speech production ability from a dual
perspective: speech competence and speech performance. A total of 118 valid L2 Chinese learners finished two developed tests in
this study, namely, the Chinese speech competence test and the Chinese speech performance test. The results suggested that L2
Chinese learners’ speech competence and speech performance, as a twofold rendering of their L2 speech production ability, not only
showed a significant positive correlation with a large effect size (Pearson’s r = .598) but also significantly
predicted each other with a large effect size (Cohen f2
= .555). However, such large effect sizes of
the correlation and the prediction between speech competence and speech performance were not supported among the
upper-intermediate L2 Chinese learners. This suggested that the development between speech competence and speech performance may
be more unbalanced among the upper-intermediate L2 Chinese learners compared with their advanced counterparts. The study adds
evidence to the call for a multidimensional evaluation of L2 speech production ability. It is hoped that the dual approach (i.e.,
speech competence and speech performance) proposed in the present study may contribute to a more comprehensive evaluation of
learners’ L2 Chinese speech production ability. Consequently, classroom-based teaching can be tailored to facilitate a more
balanced development of L2 Chinese learners’ speech competence and speech performance.