反规避限制性措施:欧盟的回应

IF 1.7 2区 社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
F. Finelli
{"title":"反规避限制性措施:欧盟的回应","authors":"F. Finelli","doi":"10.54648/cola2023050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Restrictive measures are always complemented by an “anti-circumvention clause” which prohibits participation in activities the object or effect of which is to circumvent EU provisions. This clause plays a key role in ensuring the effectiveness of sanctions and, ultimately, the objectives of EU external action. This article intends to shed light on the obligations arising from the anti-circumvention clause, with a specific focus on financial restrictive measures against designated individuals (which essentially entail asset freeze measures against them). First, the scope of the anti-circumvention clause under EU law is defined. Second, the actors involved in uncovering and countering circumvention practices within the territory of the Union are presented, illustrating the central role of the Member States in coordinating national and supranational efforts to ensure compliance with EU restrictive measures, through constant dialogue and cooperation with financial operators and the European Commission. Third, one specific circumvention strategy is explored, namely circumvention through family members. More precisely, the article investigates whether there is a presumption of circumvention when family members are involved. To this end, it considers the case law of the ECJ on the legality of family members’ designations under EU sanctions. Throughout the analysis, the article emphasizes how the exceptional circumstances in relation to the war in Ukraine have progressively changed the design of EU restrictive measures as well as the commitment of the Union to tackle circumvention. In this context, the unprecedented emphasis on circumvention is complemented by the Union’s unprecedented desire to resort to criminal enforcement. Accordingly, the effectiveness of EU restrictive measures has become a call for effective criminal enforcement.The article, however, argues that this may not be the most appropriate choice.\nRestrictive measures, anti-circumvention clause, effectiveness of sanctions, asset freeze measures","PeriodicalId":47406,"journal":{"name":"Common Market Law Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Countering circumvention of restrictive measures: The EU response\",\"authors\":\"F. Finelli\",\"doi\":\"10.54648/cola2023050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Restrictive measures are always complemented by an “anti-circumvention clause” which prohibits participation in activities the object or effect of which is to circumvent EU provisions. This clause plays a key role in ensuring the effectiveness of sanctions and, ultimately, the objectives of EU external action. This article intends to shed light on the obligations arising from the anti-circumvention clause, with a specific focus on financial restrictive measures against designated individuals (which essentially entail asset freeze measures against them). First, the scope of the anti-circumvention clause under EU law is defined. Second, the actors involved in uncovering and countering circumvention practices within the territory of the Union are presented, illustrating the central role of the Member States in coordinating national and supranational efforts to ensure compliance with EU restrictive measures, through constant dialogue and cooperation with financial operators and the European Commission. Third, one specific circumvention strategy is explored, namely circumvention through family members. More precisely, the article investigates whether there is a presumption of circumvention when family members are involved. To this end, it considers the case law of the ECJ on the legality of family members’ designations under EU sanctions. Throughout the analysis, the article emphasizes how the exceptional circumstances in relation to the war in Ukraine have progressively changed the design of EU restrictive measures as well as the commitment of the Union to tackle circumvention. In this context, the unprecedented emphasis on circumvention is complemented by the Union’s unprecedented desire to resort to criminal enforcement. Accordingly, the effectiveness of EU restrictive measures has become a call for effective criminal enforcement.The article, however, argues that this may not be the most appropriate choice.\\nRestrictive measures, anti-circumvention clause, effectiveness of sanctions, asset freeze measures\",\"PeriodicalId\":47406,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Common Market Law Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Common Market Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54648/cola2023050\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Common Market Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/cola2023050","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

限制性措施总是与“反规避条款”相辅相成,该条款禁止参与旨在规避欧盟规定的活动。这一条款在确保制裁的有效性以及最终实现欧盟对外行动目标方面发挥着关键作用。本条旨在阐明反规避条款所产生的义务,特别侧重于针对指定个人的金融限制措施(这基本上需要对他们采取资产冻结措施)。首先,界定了欧盟法律中反规避条款的适用范围。其次,介绍了在欧盟领土内揭露和打击规避行为的行为者,说明了成员国通过与金融运营商和欧盟委员会的不断对话和合作,在协调国家和超国家努力以确保遵守欧盟限制措施方面的核心作用。第三,探讨了一种具体的规避策略,即通过家庭成员规避。更确切地说,本文调查了当涉及家庭成员时是否存在规避推定。为此,它考虑了欧洲法院关于欧盟制裁下家庭成员被指定的合法性的判例法。在整个分析中,文章强调了与乌克兰战争有关的特殊情况如何逐步改变了欧盟限制措施的设计以及欧盟解决规避的承诺。在这方面,欧盟前所未有地强调规避,同时也前所未有地希望诉诸刑事执法。因此,欧盟限制措施的有效性已成为对有效刑事执法的呼吁。然而,这篇文章认为,这可能不是最合适的选择。限制性措施、反规避条款、制裁有效性、资产冻结措施
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Countering circumvention of restrictive measures: The EU response
Restrictive measures are always complemented by an “anti-circumvention clause” which prohibits participation in activities the object or effect of which is to circumvent EU provisions. This clause plays a key role in ensuring the effectiveness of sanctions and, ultimately, the objectives of EU external action. This article intends to shed light on the obligations arising from the anti-circumvention clause, with a specific focus on financial restrictive measures against designated individuals (which essentially entail asset freeze measures against them). First, the scope of the anti-circumvention clause under EU law is defined. Second, the actors involved in uncovering and countering circumvention practices within the territory of the Union are presented, illustrating the central role of the Member States in coordinating national and supranational efforts to ensure compliance with EU restrictive measures, through constant dialogue and cooperation with financial operators and the European Commission. Third, one specific circumvention strategy is explored, namely circumvention through family members. More precisely, the article investigates whether there is a presumption of circumvention when family members are involved. To this end, it considers the case law of the ECJ on the legality of family members’ designations under EU sanctions. Throughout the analysis, the article emphasizes how the exceptional circumstances in relation to the war in Ukraine have progressively changed the design of EU restrictive measures as well as the commitment of the Union to tackle circumvention. In this context, the unprecedented emphasis on circumvention is complemented by the Union’s unprecedented desire to resort to criminal enforcement. Accordingly, the effectiveness of EU restrictive measures has become a call for effective criminal enforcement.The article, however, argues that this may not be the most appropriate choice. Restrictive measures, anti-circumvention clause, effectiveness of sanctions, asset freeze measures
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
30.40%
发文量
111
期刊介绍: The Common Market Law Review has provided a forum for the keenest legal minds in the fields for more than 40 years. Because of the international composition of its Editorial Board, and in view of the fact that it is able to attract contributions from all over Europe, and from the United States, the Review is able to adopt a unique approach to capitilize Community issues. Each issue contains articles dealing with matters of current interest; the authoritative treatment given to each topic ensures lasting juridical value. This pre-eminent journal brings you detailed, in-depth examination of the most pressing and far-reaching issues on Community Law.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信