正式和非正式机构之间的共生关系:巴西五大文化生态系统的比较

IF 2.8 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Vito Amendolagine , Nadia von Jacobi
{"title":"正式和非正式机构之间的共生关系:巴西五大文化生态系统的比较","authors":"Vito Amendolagine ,&nbsp;Nadia von Jacobi","doi":"10.1016/j.ecosys.2023.101092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper draws on ecology to advance insights on the relationships between formal and informal institutions. We are interested in observing change in such relationships in different cultural contexts. Extending the research traditions of institutional complementarities and of institutional analysis inspired by biology, we focus on symbiotic relationships to understand interdependence patterns between formal and informal institutions. We compare five Brazilian macroregions, which have experienced different historical processes. We treat each region as a different “cultural ecosystem” within which institutional symbiotic relationships unfold. Building on correlation network analysis, we compute networks of multiple and contemporaneous symbiotic relationships for each macroregion. Our results suggest that formal institutions tend to be “symbionts,” which are more “dependent” on informal institutions acting as “hosts” within asymmetric symbiotic relationships. Our comparison shows that asymmetry between formal and informal institutions is more evident in cultural ecosystems in which institutions have traditionally been more extractive, such as in the northern Brazilian macroregions. In cultural ecosystems with historically more inclusive processes, formal institutions have greater tendency to become a nurturing ground for other institutions, confirming Pritchett’s (2013) argument that successful formal institutions are consolidations/formalizations of a successful societal struggle.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51505,"journal":{"name":"Economic Systems","volume":"47 3","pages":"Article 101092"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Symbiotic relationships among formal and informal institutions: Comparing five Brazilian cultural ecosystems\",\"authors\":\"Vito Amendolagine ,&nbsp;Nadia von Jacobi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecosys.2023.101092\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper draws on ecology to advance insights on the relationships between formal and informal institutions. We are interested in observing change in such relationships in different cultural contexts. Extending the research traditions of institutional complementarities and of institutional analysis inspired by biology, we focus on symbiotic relationships to understand interdependence patterns between formal and informal institutions. We compare five Brazilian macroregions, which have experienced different historical processes. We treat each region as a different “cultural ecosystem” within which institutional symbiotic relationships unfold. Building on correlation network analysis, we compute networks of multiple and contemporaneous symbiotic relationships for each macroregion. Our results suggest that formal institutions tend to be “symbionts,” which are more “dependent” on informal institutions acting as “hosts” within asymmetric symbiotic relationships. Our comparison shows that asymmetry between formal and informal institutions is more evident in cultural ecosystems in which institutions have traditionally been more extractive, such as in the northern Brazilian macroregions. In cultural ecosystems with historically more inclusive processes, formal institutions have greater tendency to become a nurturing ground for other institutions, confirming Pritchett’s (2013) argument that successful formal institutions are consolidations/formalizations of a successful societal struggle.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economic Systems\",\"volume\":\"47 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 101092\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economic Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0939362523000213\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Systems","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0939362523000213","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文从生态学的角度对正式制度和非正式制度之间的关系进行了深入的研究。我们感兴趣的是观察这种关系在不同文化背景下的变化。延续制度互补性和受生物学启发的制度分析的研究传统,我们将重点放在共生关系上,以理解正式和非正式制度之间的相互依存模式。我们比较了巴西五个经历了不同历史进程的宏观区域。我们将每个地区视为一个不同的“文化生态系统”,在其中制度共生关系展开。在相关网络分析的基础上,我们计算了每个宏观区域的多个和同期共生关系网络。我们的研究结果表明,正式制度倾向于成为“共生体”,在不对称的共生关系中,非正式制度更“依赖”于充当“宿主”的非正式制度。我们的比较表明,在传统上制度更具采掘性的文化生态系统中,正式制度和非正式制度之间的不对称更为明显,例如在巴西北部宏观地区。在历史上更具包容性的文化生态系统中,正式制度更倾向于成为其他制度的培育基础,这证实了Pritchett(2013)的观点,即成功的正式制度是成功的社会斗争的巩固/正规化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Symbiotic relationships among formal and informal institutions: Comparing five Brazilian cultural ecosystems

This paper draws on ecology to advance insights on the relationships between formal and informal institutions. We are interested in observing change in such relationships in different cultural contexts. Extending the research traditions of institutional complementarities and of institutional analysis inspired by biology, we focus on symbiotic relationships to understand interdependence patterns between formal and informal institutions. We compare five Brazilian macroregions, which have experienced different historical processes. We treat each region as a different “cultural ecosystem” within which institutional symbiotic relationships unfold. Building on correlation network analysis, we compute networks of multiple and contemporaneous symbiotic relationships for each macroregion. Our results suggest that formal institutions tend to be “symbionts,” which are more “dependent” on informal institutions acting as “hosts” within asymmetric symbiotic relationships. Our comparison shows that asymmetry between formal and informal institutions is more evident in cultural ecosystems in which institutions have traditionally been more extractive, such as in the northern Brazilian macroregions. In cultural ecosystems with historically more inclusive processes, formal institutions have greater tendency to become a nurturing ground for other institutions, confirming Pritchett’s (2013) argument that successful formal institutions are consolidations/formalizations of a successful societal struggle.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Economic Systems
Economic Systems ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
83
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Economic Systems is a refereed journal for the analysis of causes and consequences of the significant institutional variety prevailing among developed, developing, and emerging economies, as well as attempts at and proposals for their reform. The journal is open to micro and macro contributions, theoretical as well as empirical, the latter to analyze related topics against the background of country or region-specific experiences. In this respect, Economic Systems retains its long standing interest in the emerging economies of Central and Eastern Europe and other former transition economies, but also encourages contributions that cover any part of the world, including Asia, Latin America, the Middle East, or Africa.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信