使用Macintosh和Airtraq喉镜评估喉镜检查过程中颈椎运动的比较研究

IF 1.5 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Kiranpreet Kaur, Rameez Raja, Prashant Kumar, Roop Singh, Sumedha Vashishth, Harshil D Singh, Mamta Bhardwaj, Suresh K Singhal
{"title":"使用Macintosh和Airtraq喉镜评估喉镜检查过程中颈椎运动的比较研究","authors":"Kiranpreet Kaur, Rameez Raja, Prashant Kumar, Roop Singh, Sumedha Vashishth, Harshil D Singh, Mamta Bhardwaj, Suresh K Singhal","doi":"10.4103/joacp.joacp_89_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Intubation with Macintosh requires flexing the lower cervical spine and extending the atlanto-occipital joint to create a \"line of sight.\" Primary aim of study was to compare the extent of cervical spine movement during laryngoscopy using conventional Macintosh laryngoscope and Airtraq.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A total of 25 patients of either sex between the age group of 18 and 60 years, having American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status of Grade-I and Grade-II, scheduled for elective surgery under image control requiring general anesthesia and intubation were enrolled. A baseline image of the lateral cervical spine including the first four cervical vertebrae was taken by an image intensifier. After administration of general anesthesia, laryngoscopy was first performed using a Macintosh laryngoscope and a second X-ray image of the lateral cervical spine was taken. The second laryngoscopy using a Airtraq laryngoscope was done and the third image of the lateral cervical spine was taken. Angles between occiput and C<sub>1;</sub> C<sub>1</sub> and C<sub>2;</sub> C<sub>2</sub> and C<sub>3;</sub> C<sub>3</sub> and C<sub>4;</sub> and occiput and C<sub>4</sub> were calculated. Atlanto-occipital distance (AOD) was calculated as the distance between occiput and C<sub>1</sub>.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Macintosh showed greater cervical movement as compared with Airtraq but a significant difference in the movement was observed at C<sub>2</sub>-C<sub>3</sub> and C<sub>0</sub>-C<sub>4</sub>. Baseline mean AOD was 2.21 ± 1.25 mm, after Macintosh and Airtraq laryngoscopy was found to be 1.13 ± 0.60 and 1.6 ± 0.78 mm, respectively, and was found to be significant (<i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We conclude that Airtraq allows intubation with less movement of the upper cervical spine makes Airtraq preferred equipment for intubation in patients with a potential cervical spine injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":14946,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11042109/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative study to evaluate the cervical spine movements during laryngoscopy using Macintosh and Airtraq laryngoscopes.\",\"authors\":\"Kiranpreet Kaur, Rameez Raja, Prashant Kumar, Roop Singh, Sumedha Vashishth, Harshil D Singh, Mamta Bhardwaj, Suresh K Singhal\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/joacp.joacp_89_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Intubation with Macintosh requires flexing the lower cervical spine and extending the atlanto-occipital joint to create a \\\"line of sight.\\\" Primary aim of study was to compare the extent of cervical spine movement during laryngoscopy using conventional Macintosh laryngoscope and Airtraq.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A total of 25 patients of either sex between the age group of 18 and 60 years, having American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status of Grade-I and Grade-II, scheduled for elective surgery under image control requiring general anesthesia and intubation were enrolled. A baseline image of the lateral cervical spine including the first four cervical vertebrae was taken by an image intensifier. After administration of general anesthesia, laryngoscopy was first performed using a Macintosh laryngoscope and a second X-ray image of the lateral cervical spine was taken. The second laryngoscopy using a Airtraq laryngoscope was done and the third image of the lateral cervical spine was taken. Angles between occiput and C<sub>1;</sub> C<sub>1</sub> and C<sub>2;</sub> C<sub>2</sub> and C<sub>3;</sub> C<sub>3</sub> and C<sub>4;</sub> and occiput and C<sub>4</sub> were calculated. Atlanto-occipital distance (AOD) was calculated as the distance between occiput and C<sub>1</sub>.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Macintosh showed greater cervical movement as compared with Airtraq but a significant difference in the movement was observed at C<sub>2</sub>-C<sub>3</sub> and C<sub>0</sub>-C<sub>4</sub>. Baseline mean AOD was 2.21 ± 1.25 mm, after Macintosh and Airtraq laryngoscopy was found to be 1.13 ± 0.60 and 1.6 ± 0.78 mm, respectively, and was found to be significant (<i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We conclude that Airtraq allows intubation with less movement of the upper cervical spine makes Airtraq preferred equipment for intubation in patients with a potential cervical spine injury.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14946,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11042109/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/joacp.joacp_89_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/7/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/joacp.joacp_89_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Macintosh插管需要弯曲下颈椎并延伸寰枕关节以形成“视线”。研究的主要目的是比较使用传统Macintosh喉镜和Airtraq进行喉镜检查时颈椎运动的程度。共有25名年龄在18岁至60岁之间的男女患者,其美国麻醉师协会(ASA)身体状况为一级和二级,计划在图像控制下进行选择性手术,需要全身麻醉和插管。通过图像增强器拍摄包括前四个颈椎的横向颈椎的基线图像。全身麻醉后,首先使用Macintosh喉镜进行喉镜检查,并拍摄颈椎侧面的第二张X射线图像。使用Airtraq喉镜进行第二次喉镜检查,并拍摄颈椎侧面的第三张图像。枕骨和C1之间的角度;C1和C2;C2和C3;C3和C4;计算枕骨和C4。寰枕距离(AOD)计算为枕骨和C1之间的距离。与Airtraq相比,Macintosh显示出更大的颈部运动,但在C2–C3和C0–C4处观察到运动的显著差异。Macintosh喉镜和Airtraq喉镜检查后,基线平均AOD分别为2.21±1.25 mm和1.6±0.78 mm,具有显著性(P<0.05)。我们得出的结论是,Airtraq允许在上颈椎运动较少的情况下插管,这使Airtraq成为潜在颈椎损伤患者首选的插管设备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparative study to evaluate the cervical spine movements during laryngoscopy using Macintosh and Airtraq laryngoscopes.

Background and aim: Intubation with Macintosh requires flexing the lower cervical spine and extending the atlanto-occipital joint to create a "line of sight." Primary aim of study was to compare the extent of cervical spine movement during laryngoscopy using conventional Macintosh laryngoscope and Airtraq.

Material and methods: A total of 25 patients of either sex between the age group of 18 and 60 years, having American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status of Grade-I and Grade-II, scheduled for elective surgery under image control requiring general anesthesia and intubation were enrolled. A baseline image of the lateral cervical spine including the first four cervical vertebrae was taken by an image intensifier. After administration of general anesthesia, laryngoscopy was first performed using a Macintosh laryngoscope and a second X-ray image of the lateral cervical spine was taken. The second laryngoscopy using a Airtraq laryngoscope was done and the third image of the lateral cervical spine was taken. Angles between occiput and C1; C1 and C2; C2 and C3; C3 and C4; and occiput and C4 were calculated. Atlanto-occipital distance (AOD) was calculated as the distance between occiput and C1.

Results: Macintosh showed greater cervical movement as compared with Airtraq but a significant difference in the movement was observed at C2-C3 and C0-C4. Baseline mean AOD was 2.21 ± 1.25 mm, after Macintosh and Airtraq laryngoscopy was found to be 1.13 ± 0.60 and 1.6 ± 0.78 mm, respectively, and was found to be significant (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: We conclude that Airtraq allows intubation with less movement of the upper cervical spine makes Airtraq preferred equipment for intubation in patients with a potential cervical spine injury.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
129
期刊介绍: The JOACP publishes original peer-reviewed research and clinical work in all branches of anaesthesiology, pain, critical care and perioperative medicine including the application to basic sciences. In addition, the journal publishes review articles, special articles, brief communications/reports, case reports, and reports of new equipment, letters to editor, book reviews and obituaries. It is international in scope and comprehensive in coverage.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信