{"title":"洛斯和威尔福德济贫法公司(1765-1826):“一个名字温和的监狱”","authors":"Matthew Bayly","doi":"10.1017/S0956793320000175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Are you a parachutist or a truffle hunter? A curious question from which to start in regards this publication by the Suffolk Records Society, bringing together a collection of transcribed records of the Loes and Wilford Poor Law Incorporation from over its sixty-one-year lifespan. Shaw adopts such a metaphor from Le Roy Ladurie, the French Annales historian, to explain the scope of this work: historians can be either parachutists, observing patterns from high above; or truffle hunters, scratching ‘with their noses searching for some : : : precious fact’ (Shaw, 2019). There are clearly dangers in both, with the parachutist missing the tasty morsel and the hunter often oblivious to their wider surroundings. Shaw concludes that the historian is usually an amalgamation but offers this volume to ‘cater to the needs of the truffle hunter’ (Shaw, 2019). The local, then, is the focus here. The volume explores the experience of rural incorporations which, outside of the Webbs (1922) and Digby (1978), has largely been bypassed in discussions of Old Poor Law enabling legislation. As Shaw comments, such incorporations ‘have only obtained a passing comment : : : with most texts failing even to mention their existence’ (Shaw, 2019). Distinct from the more familiar and nationally-reaching 1723 Knatchbull’s Act and 1782 Gilbert’s Act, rural incorporations were a particularly East Anglian experience (albeit also existing in Shropshire, Hampshire and the Isle of Wight) formed between 1756 and 1806 by parliamentary act and providing indoor relief within a workhouse for incorporated parishes (Higginbotham, 2016). Shaw’s focus is on the oldest of such incorporations in Suffolk: the Loes and Wilford Poor Law Incorporation, formed in 1765 and disincorporated in late 1826. The volume begins with an introduction, setting out the local, national, legislative and historiographical context of the work, as well as including a longitudinal analysis of policy and outcomes over the course of the incorporation. The documentation-proper is split between seven quarterly minute books, beginning in July 1765 and ending in October 1826, with a further section on post-disincorporation documents. These post-1826 documents consist largely of correspondence and accounts, but also include overviews of names and settled parishes for resident paupers; inventories of the incorporation’s goods; and important, general demographic information for incorporated parishes. The content of the final section gives a good overview of the nature of the documentation in general, which outlines the detailed day-to-day running of the incorporation through such things as committee meeting notes; accounts and finance records; demographical information about both administration and paupers; inventories; legislative documentation; and incorporation policy. The minute books for the 1810s and 1820s also give particularly detailed information, organised via parish, on pauper demographics, settlement and weekly and quarterly allowances made. Detailed and precise information about the scope and nature of documentation is given (including archive reference numbers, condition and size measurements of documents) with editorial notes giving wider context by providing modern","PeriodicalId":44300,"journal":{"name":"Rural History-Economy Society Culture","volume":"32 1","pages":"115 - 119"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S0956793320000175","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Loes and Wilford Poor Law Incorporation 1765–1826: ‘A Prison with a Milder Name’\",\"authors\":\"Matthew Bayly\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0956793320000175\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Are you a parachutist or a truffle hunter? A curious question from which to start in regards this publication by the Suffolk Records Society, bringing together a collection of transcribed records of the Loes and Wilford Poor Law Incorporation from over its sixty-one-year lifespan. Shaw adopts such a metaphor from Le Roy Ladurie, the French Annales historian, to explain the scope of this work: historians can be either parachutists, observing patterns from high above; or truffle hunters, scratching ‘with their noses searching for some : : : precious fact’ (Shaw, 2019). There are clearly dangers in both, with the parachutist missing the tasty morsel and the hunter often oblivious to their wider surroundings. Shaw concludes that the historian is usually an amalgamation but offers this volume to ‘cater to the needs of the truffle hunter’ (Shaw, 2019). The local, then, is the focus here. The volume explores the experience of rural incorporations which, outside of the Webbs (1922) and Digby (1978), has largely been bypassed in discussions of Old Poor Law enabling legislation. As Shaw comments, such incorporations ‘have only obtained a passing comment : : : with most texts failing even to mention their existence’ (Shaw, 2019). Distinct from the more familiar and nationally-reaching 1723 Knatchbull’s Act and 1782 Gilbert’s Act, rural incorporations were a particularly East Anglian experience (albeit also existing in Shropshire, Hampshire and the Isle of Wight) formed between 1756 and 1806 by parliamentary act and providing indoor relief within a workhouse for incorporated parishes (Higginbotham, 2016). Shaw’s focus is on the oldest of such incorporations in Suffolk: the Loes and Wilford Poor Law Incorporation, formed in 1765 and disincorporated in late 1826. The volume begins with an introduction, setting out the local, national, legislative and historiographical context of the work, as well as including a longitudinal analysis of policy and outcomes over the course of the incorporation. The documentation-proper is split between seven quarterly minute books, beginning in July 1765 and ending in October 1826, with a further section on post-disincorporation documents. These post-1826 documents consist largely of correspondence and accounts, but also include overviews of names and settled parishes for resident paupers; inventories of the incorporation’s goods; and important, general demographic information for incorporated parishes. The content of the final section gives a good overview of the nature of the documentation in general, which outlines the detailed day-to-day running of the incorporation through such things as committee meeting notes; accounts and finance records; demographical information about both administration and paupers; inventories; legislative documentation; and incorporation policy. The minute books for the 1810s and 1820s also give particularly detailed information, organised via parish, on pauper demographics, settlement and weekly and quarterly allowances made. Detailed and precise information about the scope and nature of documentation is given (including archive reference numbers, condition and size measurements of documents) with editorial notes giving wider context by providing modern\",\"PeriodicalId\":44300,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rural History-Economy Society Culture\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"115 - 119\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S0956793320000175\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rural History-Economy Society Culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0956793320000175\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rural History-Economy Society Culture","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0956793320000175","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
你是跳伞者还是松露猎人?萨福克记录协会出版的这本出版物汇集了Loes and Wilford Poor Law Incorporation 61年来的转录记录,这是一个奇怪的问题。Shaw采用了法国《年鉴》历史学家Le Roy Ladurie的这样一个比喻来解释这项工作的范围:历史学家可以是空降兵,从高处观察模式;或者松露猎人,“用鼻子抓一些:::珍贵的事实”(Shaw,2019)。两者都有明显的危险,跳伞者错过了美味的食物,而猎人往往忽视了他们广阔的环境。Shaw得出结论,历史学家通常是一个融合体,但提供这本书是为了“满足松露猎人的需求”(Shaw,2019)。那么,当地人就是这里的焦点。本卷探讨了农村公司的经验,除了Webbs(1922)和Digby(1978)之外,在旧穷人法授权立法的讨论中,农村公司在很大程度上被忽视了。正如Shaw所评论的,这样的公司“只得到了一个短暂的评论::大多数文本甚至没有提到它们的存在”(Shaw,2019)。与更为人熟悉的全国性的1723年《克纳奇布尔法案》和1782年《吉尔伯特法案》不同,农村公司成立是1756年至1806年间通过议会法案形成的一种特别的东安格利亚体验(尽管也存在于什罗普郡、汉普郡和怀特岛),并在济贫院内为合并教区提供室内救济(Higginbotham,2016)。肖的重点是萨福克郡最古老的此类公司:Loes and Wilford Poor Law公司,成立于1765年,1826年末解散。该卷以引言开头,阐述了工作的地方、国家、立法和历史背景,并包括对合并过程中的政策和结果的纵向分析。文件本身分为七个季度会议记录簿,从1765年7月开始,到1826年10月结束,还有一节关于解散后的文件。这些1826年后的文件主要包括信件和账目,但也包括对居住贫困者的姓名和定居教区的概述;公司货物的存货;以及为合并教区提供重要的一般人口统计信息。最后一节的内容很好地概述了文件的一般性质,通过委员会会议记录等内容概述了公司的详细日常运作;账目和财务记录;关于政府和穷人的人口统计信息;存货;立法文件;以及合并政策。1810年代和1820年代的会议记录簿还通过教区组织,提供了关于穷人人口统计、定居以及每周和季度津贴的特别详细的信息。提供了有关文件范围和性质的详细和准确信息(包括档案参考号、文件的状况和尺寸测量),编辑说明通过提供现代
The Loes and Wilford Poor Law Incorporation 1765–1826: ‘A Prison with a Milder Name’
Are you a parachutist or a truffle hunter? A curious question from which to start in regards this publication by the Suffolk Records Society, bringing together a collection of transcribed records of the Loes and Wilford Poor Law Incorporation from over its sixty-one-year lifespan. Shaw adopts such a metaphor from Le Roy Ladurie, the French Annales historian, to explain the scope of this work: historians can be either parachutists, observing patterns from high above; or truffle hunters, scratching ‘with their noses searching for some : : : precious fact’ (Shaw, 2019). There are clearly dangers in both, with the parachutist missing the tasty morsel and the hunter often oblivious to their wider surroundings. Shaw concludes that the historian is usually an amalgamation but offers this volume to ‘cater to the needs of the truffle hunter’ (Shaw, 2019). The local, then, is the focus here. The volume explores the experience of rural incorporations which, outside of the Webbs (1922) and Digby (1978), has largely been bypassed in discussions of Old Poor Law enabling legislation. As Shaw comments, such incorporations ‘have only obtained a passing comment : : : with most texts failing even to mention their existence’ (Shaw, 2019). Distinct from the more familiar and nationally-reaching 1723 Knatchbull’s Act and 1782 Gilbert’s Act, rural incorporations were a particularly East Anglian experience (albeit also existing in Shropshire, Hampshire and the Isle of Wight) formed between 1756 and 1806 by parliamentary act and providing indoor relief within a workhouse for incorporated parishes (Higginbotham, 2016). Shaw’s focus is on the oldest of such incorporations in Suffolk: the Loes and Wilford Poor Law Incorporation, formed in 1765 and disincorporated in late 1826. The volume begins with an introduction, setting out the local, national, legislative and historiographical context of the work, as well as including a longitudinal analysis of policy and outcomes over the course of the incorporation. The documentation-proper is split between seven quarterly minute books, beginning in July 1765 and ending in October 1826, with a further section on post-disincorporation documents. These post-1826 documents consist largely of correspondence and accounts, but also include overviews of names and settled parishes for resident paupers; inventories of the incorporation’s goods; and important, general demographic information for incorporated parishes. The content of the final section gives a good overview of the nature of the documentation in general, which outlines the detailed day-to-day running of the incorporation through such things as committee meeting notes; accounts and finance records; demographical information about both administration and paupers; inventories; legislative documentation; and incorporation policy. The minute books for the 1810s and 1820s also give particularly detailed information, organised via parish, on pauper demographics, settlement and weekly and quarterly allowances made. Detailed and precise information about the scope and nature of documentation is given (including archive reference numbers, condition and size measurements of documents) with editorial notes giving wider context by providing modern
期刊介绍:
Rural History is well known as a stimulating forum for interdisciplinary exchange. Its definition of rural history ignores traditional subject boundaries to encourage the cross-fertilisation that is essential for an understanding of rural society. It stimulates original scholarship and provides access to the best of recent research. While concentrating on the English-speaking world and Europe, the journal is not limited in geographical coverage. Subject areas include: agricultural history; historical ecology; folklore; popular culture and religion; rural literature; landscape history, archaeology and material culture; vernacular architecture; ethnography, anthropology and rural sociology; the study of women in rural societies.