在阿巴拉契亚及其他地区争夺知识基金:职前教师的转变背景

Q2 Social Sciences
Melissa Sherfinski, Sharon B Hayes, Jing Zhang, Mariam Jalalifard
{"title":"在阿巴拉契亚及其他地区争夺知识基金:职前教师的转变背景","authors":"Melissa Sherfinski, Sharon B Hayes, Jing Zhang, Mariam Jalalifard","doi":"10.1080/01626620.2020.1755384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Funds of Knowledge (FoK) is a form of research in which families’ practices inform education. Unfortunately, neoliberalism minimizes understanding families’ assets because educators must transmit standardized knowledge for tests. In Appalachia, grappling with complex knowledge is challenging because of the opioid crisis. Through Bakhtin’s theory of polyvocality, this case study examined how White pre-service teachers (PSTs) in rural Appalachia attempted to “grapple” with FoK during student teaching and in diversified settings after graduation. Findings showed that teacher educators sought to promote FoK but PSTs thought about the children and families they worked with in rural and Appalachian settings through a deficit lens. Former PSTs that remained in rural and Appalachian contexts presented emergent knowledge of FoK yet framed their White students as “traumatized.” Those who moved to urban/suburban contexts with many students of color focused on behaviors and did not discuss FoK. Suggestions for policymakers and teacher educators are included.","PeriodicalId":52183,"journal":{"name":"Action in Teacher Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01626620.2020.1755384","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Grappling with Funds of Knowledge in Rural Appalachia and Beyond: Shifting Contexts of Pre-Service Teachers\",\"authors\":\"Melissa Sherfinski, Sharon B Hayes, Jing Zhang, Mariam Jalalifard\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01626620.2020.1755384\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Funds of Knowledge (FoK) is a form of research in which families’ practices inform education. Unfortunately, neoliberalism minimizes understanding families’ assets because educators must transmit standardized knowledge for tests. In Appalachia, grappling with complex knowledge is challenging because of the opioid crisis. Through Bakhtin’s theory of polyvocality, this case study examined how White pre-service teachers (PSTs) in rural Appalachia attempted to “grapple” with FoK during student teaching and in diversified settings after graduation. Findings showed that teacher educators sought to promote FoK but PSTs thought about the children and families they worked with in rural and Appalachian settings through a deficit lens. Former PSTs that remained in rural and Appalachian contexts presented emergent knowledge of FoK yet framed their White students as “traumatized.” Those who moved to urban/suburban contexts with many students of color focused on behaviors and did not discuss FoK. Suggestions for policymakers and teacher educators are included.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52183,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Action in Teacher Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01626620.2020.1755384\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Action in Teacher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2020.1755384\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Action in Teacher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2020.1755384","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

知识基金是一种家庭实践为教育提供信息的研究形式。不幸的是,新自由主义最大限度地减少了对家庭资产的理解,因为教育工作者必须为考试传递标准化的知识。在阿巴拉契亚,由于阿片类药物危机,应对复杂知识是一项挑战。通过巴赫金的多元语言理论,本案例研究考察了阿巴拉契亚农村的白人职前教师(PSTs)如何在学生教学期间和毕业后的多样化环境中试图与FoK“斗争”。调查结果显示,教师教育工作者试图推广FoK,但PST通过赤字视角思考他们在农村和阿巴拉契亚地区工作的孩子和家庭。留在农村和阿巴拉契亚地区的前PST提供了对FoK的新知识,但将他们的白人学生定义为“受过创伤的”。那些与许多有色人种学生一起搬到城市/郊区的学生专注于行为,不讨论FoK。其中包括对政策制定者和教师教育者的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Grappling with Funds of Knowledge in Rural Appalachia and Beyond: Shifting Contexts of Pre-Service Teachers
ABSTRACT Funds of Knowledge (FoK) is a form of research in which families’ practices inform education. Unfortunately, neoliberalism minimizes understanding families’ assets because educators must transmit standardized knowledge for tests. In Appalachia, grappling with complex knowledge is challenging because of the opioid crisis. Through Bakhtin’s theory of polyvocality, this case study examined how White pre-service teachers (PSTs) in rural Appalachia attempted to “grapple” with FoK during student teaching and in diversified settings after graduation. Findings showed that teacher educators sought to promote FoK but PSTs thought about the children and families they worked with in rural and Appalachian settings through a deficit lens. Former PSTs that remained in rural and Appalachian contexts presented emergent knowledge of FoK yet framed their White students as “traumatized.” Those who moved to urban/suburban contexts with many students of color focused on behaviors and did not discuss FoK. Suggestions for policymakers and teacher educators are included.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Action in Teacher Education
Action in Teacher Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信