{"title":"Birds of Prey: Hitler's Luftwaffe, Ordinary Soldiers, and the Holocaust in Poland By Philip W. Blood. Stuttgart: ibidem, 2021. Pp. xv + 484. Paperback €39.90. ISBN: 978-3838215679.","authors":"D. Mckale","doi":"10.1017/s0008938922001546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"quence of France’s military defeat in June 1940. It cooperated willingly with the Vichy government but was not as politicized as the NSV, nor did it promote a program of lasting social or political change. Like the NSV, most of its employees worked gratis. Unlike the NSV, the National Relief selected employees based on qualifications, most of whom were upper-middle-class Catholic women. It, too, was financed by a combination of contributions, for which it enjoyed a monopoly, and government transfers. Some of its revenues came from expropriations and fines imposed on Jews and political opponents of the Vichy regime. It also received sizeable contributions from France’s overseas territories. The National Relief had no explicit policy concerning Jews, though some of its local officials refused to help them on racist grounds. It also discriminated against Gaullists and communists. When choosing beneficiaries, it concentrated on age and place of residence. Hadwiger characterizes the National Relief as a middle-class, Catholic war charity. After 1949, it, too, was quickly forgotten. The author’s thesis that the NSV and the National Relief lay at the center of wartime social welfare policy in their respective countries is untenable. It would be more accurate to say that the two charities played significant supporting roles. The fashionable interpretive ideas used by the author add little to his analysis. Nationale Solidarität und ihre Grenzen serves two useful purposes: it offers the reader a convenient way to learn a great deal about the two charities, and it provides us with an example of the hazards of presentism.","PeriodicalId":45053,"journal":{"name":"Central European History","volume":"56 1","pages":"128 - 130"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central European History","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0008938922001546","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"人文科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
1940年6月法国战败的照片。它愿意与维希政府合作,但不像新民军那样政治化,也没有推行持久的社会或政治变革计划。和NSV一样,它的大多数员工都是无偿工作。与NSV不同的是,国家救济会根据资格选择雇员,其中大多数是中上层天主教妇女。它的资金来源也是由两方面组成的,一方面是它享有垄断地位的捐款,另一方面是政府的转移支付。它的部分收入来自对犹太人和维希政权的政治对手征收的财产和罚款。它还从法国海外领地获得了相当大的捐款。国家救济会对犹太人没有明确的政策,尽管一些地方官员以种族主义为由拒绝帮助他们。它还歧视戴高乐主义者和共产主义者。在选择受益人时,侧重于年龄和居住地。哈德维格将国家救济会描述为一个中产阶级的天主教战争慈善组织。1949年后,它也很快被遗忘了。作者认为NSV和国家救济是各自国家战时社会福利政策的核心,这一论点是站不住脚的。更准确地说,这两个慈善机构发挥了重要的支持作用。作者所使用的时髦的解释观点对他的分析没有什么帮助。Nationale Solidarität und ihre Grenzen有两个有用的目的:它为读者提供了一个方便的方式来了解这两个慈善机构,它为我们提供了一个关于当下主义危害的例子。
Birds of Prey: Hitler's Luftwaffe, Ordinary Soldiers, and the Holocaust in Poland By Philip W. Blood. Stuttgart: ibidem, 2021. Pp. xv + 484. Paperback €39.90. ISBN: 978-3838215679.
quence of France’s military defeat in June 1940. It cooperated willingly with the Vichy government but was not as politicized as the NSV, nor did it promote a program of lasting social or political change. Like the NSV, most of its employees worked gratis. Unlike the NSV, the National Relief selected employees based on qualifications, most of whom were upper-middle-class Catholic women. It, too, was financed by a combination of contributions, for which it enjoyed a monopoly, and government transfers. Some of its revenues came from expropriations and fines imposed on Jews and political opponents of the Vichy regime. It also received sizeable contributions from France’s overseas territories. The National Relief had no explicit policy concerning Jews, though some of its local officials refused to help them on racist grounds. It also discriminated against Gaullists and communists. When choosing beneficiaries, it concentrated on age and place of residence. Hadwiger characterizes the National Relief as a middle-class, Catholic war charity. After 1949, it, too, was quickly forgotten. The author’s thesis that the NSV and the National Relief lay at the center of wartime social welfare policy in their respective countries is untenable. It would be more accurate to say that the two charities played significant supporting roles. The fashionable interpretive ideas used by the author add little to his analysis. Nationale Solidarität und ihre Grenzen serves two useful purposes: it offers the reader a convenient way to learn a great deal about the two charities, and it provides us with an example of the hazards of presentism.
期刊介绍:
Central European History offers articles, review essays, and book reviews that range widely through the history of Germany, Austria, and other German-speaking regions of Central Europe from the medieval era to the present. All topics and approaches to history are welcome, whether cultural, social, political, diplomatic, intellectual, economic, and military history, as well as historiography and methodology. Contributions that treat new fields, such as post-1945 and post-1989 history, maturing fields such as gender history, and less-represented fields such as medieval history and the history of the Habsburg lands are especially desired. The journal thus aims to be the primary venue for scholarly exchange and debate among scholars of the history of Central Europe.