超越一般杂交:纳洛·霍普金森与科幻政治

IF 0.1 4区 文学 0 LITERATURE, AFRICAN, AUSTRALIAN, CANADIAN
Jessica Mcdonald
{"title":"超越一般杂交:纳洛·霍普金森与科幻政治","authors":"Jessica Mcdonald","doi":"10.14288/CL.V0I228-9.187592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using Nalo Hopkinson’s novel Brown Girl in the Ring as a case study, I argue that science fiction—as a rhetorically-structured genre—has functioned in insidious, neo-colonial ways to ghettoize non-white, non-Western epistemologies by rejecting them as “science” fiction and relegating them to the realm of “fantasy.” I reveal how Hopkinson’s novel illustrates that the colonial and science fictional agendas can be paired, contending that Brown Girl can be read in two ways: first, as a commentary on ongoing colonial paradigms, and second, as a critique of science fiction in general. From this, I further develop the problems of science fiction, including that its generic circumscriptions police the conceptual boundaries of the future by structurally designating which futures are scientific or plausible. I conclude by addressing the various solutions presented by others and counter that any productive generic transformation must come from within the existing category of science fiction.","PeriodicalId":44701,"journal":{"name":"CANADIAN LITERATURE","volume":"1 1","pages":"133-149"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond Generic Hybridity: Nalo Hopkinson and the Politics of Science Fiction\",\"authors\":\"Jessica Mcdonald\",\"doi\":\"10.14288/CL.V0I228-9.187592\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Using Nalo Hopkinson’s novel Brown Girl in the Ring as a case study, I argue that science fiction—as a rhetorically-structured genre—has functioned in insidious, neo-colonial ways to ghettoize non-white, non-Western epistemologies by rejecting them as “science” fiction and relegating them to the realm of “fantasy.” I reveal how Hopkinson’s novel illustrates that the colonial and science fictional agendas can be paired, contending that Brown Girl can be read in two ways: first, as a commentary on ongoing colonial paradigms, and second, as a critique of science fiction in general. From this, I further develop the problems of science fiction, including that its generic circumscriptions police the conceptual boundaries of the future by structurally designating which futures are scientific or plausible. I conclude by addressing the various solutions presented by others and counter that any productive generic transformation must come from within the existing category of science fiction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44701,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CANADIAN LITERATURE\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"133-149\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CANADIAN LITERATURE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14288/CL.V0I228-9.187592\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, AFRICAN, AUSTRALIAN, CANADIAN\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CANADIAN LITERATURE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14288/CL.V0I228-9.187592","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, AFRICAN, AUSTRALIAN, CANADIAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

以纳洛·霍普金森的小说《指环王中的棕色女孩》为例,我认为,科幻小说作为一种修辞结构的类型,以阴险的新殖民主义方式,通过拒绝将非白人、非西方的认识论视为“科学”小说,并将其降级到“幻想”领域,从而将其种族化。“我揭示了霍普金森的小说如何说明殖民主义和科幻小说的议程可以配对,认为《棕色女孩》可以用两种方式阅读:第一,作为对正在进行的殖民主义范式的评论,第二,作为对科幻小说的总体批判。由此,我进一步发展了科幻小说的问题,包括它的一般限制通过从结构上指定哪些未来是科学的或合理的来监督未来的概念边界。最后,我谈到了其他人提出的各种解决方案,并反驳说,任何富有成效的一般性转变都必须来自现有的科幻小说类别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Beyond Generic Hybridity: Nalo Hopkinson and the Politics of Science Fiction
Using Nalo Hopkinson’s novel Brown Girl in the Ring as a case study, I argue that science fiction—as a rhetorically-structured genre—has functioned in insidious, neo-colonial ways to ghettoize non-white, non-Western epistemologies by rejecting them as “science” fiction and relegating them to the realm of “fantasy.” I reveal how Hopkinson’s novel illustrates that the colonial and science fictional agendas can be paired, contending that Brown Girl can be read in two ways: first, as a commentary on ongoing colonial paradigms, and second, as a critique of science fiction in general. From this, I further develop the problems of science fiction, including that its generic circumscriptions police the conceptual boundaries of the future by structurally designating which futures are scientific or plausible. I conclude by addressing the various solutions presented by others and counter that any productive generic transformation must come from within the existing category of science fiction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CANADIAN LITERATURE
CANADIAN LITERATURE LITERATURE, AFRICAN, AUSTRALIAN, CANADIAN-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Canadian Literature aims to foster a wider academic interest in the Canadian literary field, and publishes a wide range of material from Canadian and international scholars, writers, and poets. Each issue contains a variety of critical articles, an extensive book reviews section, and a selection of original poetry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信